Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reid voted *No* on the republican wiretap bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:27 PM
Original message
Reid voted *No* on the republican wiretap bill
roll call: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Senate-RollCall-Terrorism.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print


August 03, 2007

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Senate action on FISA legislation:

A few weeks ago, I made a personal commitment to the Director of National Intelligence that I would lead the Senate to passage of a bill that would help protect America from terrorist attack by enhancing our intelligence community’s foreign intelligence collection capability.

Senate Democrats worked in good faith with the Director of National Intelligence to produce the Rockefeller-Levin bill that was tough on terrorists, provided much-need oversight of the Attorney General, and did not infringe on the constitutional rights of American citizens. Rather than pass this bill, my Republican colleagues chose to rubberstamp a flawed Administration proposal that fails to provide the accountability needed in light of the Administration’s repeated past mismanagement of key tools in the war on terror.

This bill will sunset in six months. Over the course of the fall, I expect the Senate to work diligently on more permanent legislation that will better serve American national security interests and the American people.

http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/006473.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. good.........How did Liarman vote? Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. For. I saw the roll call on the NY Times and checked.
I'm sure you expected that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. who gives a shit, it passed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. can you tell me in your own words what the negative effects of the bill will be if it prevails?
To me, it looks like a temporary measure to intercept foreign communications into the U.S. which are transmitted by U.S. carriers. It has an ultimate review by FISA, even though they get 120 days before FISA passes judgment on it. I want a measure which has more of an initial review by someone outside of the administration, but I really can't get worked up over this particular concession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. 120 days is 120 days too long for an administration who cant recall what they did yesterday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why did Reid allow it to go up knowing they didn't have the votes? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. I feel so much better that harry the appeaser voted no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC