Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First results on Ca. voting machines decision.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 02:18 AM
Original message
First results on Ca. voting machines decision.
Listening to a poor cell phone coverage of Bowen's announcement for recertification plans for CA voting systems. Transcribing as I can. Joined late (will clean up the following as we can clarify)....

missed beginning of conference, joing late...

100% manual count for diebold and sequoia DREs.
One machine per polling place.

ES&S InkaVote Plus (as used in Los Angeles County)
ES&S ignored my March demand to submit source code. ES&S eventually submitted source code to late for t2b review. Therefore, decertifying InkaVote Plus without recertification.

BLOGGED BY Brad Friedman ON 8/4/2007 12:13AM PT
http://www.bradblog.com/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. love the sound of manual count
w00t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. ooooooh -YES
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Here's an update!
Edited on Sat Aug-04-07 02:36 AM by napi21
Now on the SoS website...

Decertification/Recertification Decisions Issued August 3, 2007, by Secretary of State Debra Bowen

Diebold Election Systems, Inc.

* Withdrawal of Approval/Conditional Reapproval (.pdf, 6,734KB) http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voting_systems/ttbr/diebold.pdf

Hart InterCivic Withdrawl/Conditional of Approval/Conditional Reapproval for Hart System 6.2.1 (.pdf, 5,886KB) http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voting_systems/ttbr/hart.pdf

* Voluntary Withdrawal of Certification of Hart System 6.1 (.pdf, 303KB) http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voting_systems/hart_6.1.pdf

Sequoia Voting Systems

* Withdrawal of Approval/Conditional Reapproval (.pdf, 4,631KB) http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voting_systems/ttbr/sequoia.pdf

Elections Systems and Software, Inc.

* Rescission and Withdrawal of Approval (.pdf, 303KB) http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voting_systems/ess_rescission_withdrawal.pdf

Listening to a poor cell phone coverage of Bowen's announcement for recertification plans for CA voting systems. Transcribing as I can. Joined late (will clean up the following as we can clarify)....

missed beginning of conference, joining late...

DREs decertified and recertified for use by disabled only, one per precinct.
100% manual count for Diebold and Sequoia DREs.
One machine per polling place.

ES&S InkaVote Plus (as used in Los Angeles County)
ES&S ignored my March demand to submit source code. ES&S eventually submitted source code to late for t2b review. Therefore, "I am decertifying the InkaVote Plus without recertification."

Voters are victims of federal certification process that has not done a job of assuring machines are accurate, accessible, secure.

I reject suggestion that I should not make changes to voting systems simply because of cost...When NASA finds a problem, they don't continue just because they've already spent the money. They scrub the mission and spend the money to get it right. We must do same with elections.

Paper ballots are simply easier to understand by voters.

Had federal testing been done on source code, it could have made a great difference.

(sorry, this is very difficult to hear, doing my best.)

DEVELOPING...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Decisions Issued
Decertification/Recertification Decisions Issued August 3, 2007, by Secretary of State Debra Bowen

Diebold Election Systems, Inc.

* Withdrawal of Approval/Conditional Reapproval (.pdf, 6,734KB)

Hart InterCivic

* Withdrawal of Approval/Conditional Reapproval for Hart System 6.2.1 (.pdf, 5,886KB)
* Voluntary Withdrawal of Certification of Hart System 6.1 (.pdf, 303KB)

Sequoia Voting Systems

* Withdrawal of Approval/Conditional Reapproval (.pdf, 4,631KB)

Elections Systems and Software, Inc.

* Rescission and Withdrawal of Approval (.pdf, 303KB)

http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_vsr.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Sounds like a great day for honest elections in California! recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. This thread needs some recommendations!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. morning kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Let The Sunshine In!!!
Yeah!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. This is the best news in awhile
I am ambivalent to any celebrations though, this seems to be only a win for the first round of a very long nasty fight with a lot of corrupt republicans in all levels of the government :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Summer93 Donating Member (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. Kick and Recommend
This is very good news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC