Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Webb Statement on FISA Vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 06:53 PM
Original message
Sen. Webb Statement on FISA Vote
Edited on Sat Aug-04-07 07:34 PM by ProSense
Sen. Webb Statement on FISA Vote
by: Lowell
Sat Aug 04, 2007 at 17:39:06 PM EDT

From Sen. Webb's office:

Yesterday I supported two measures to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. These measures were considered against the backdrop of heightened concerns from our nation's intelligence community abut the threat of international terrorism. The ramifications of the two amendments before us last night were not political. Instead they related to the urgent demands of national security. I chose to heed those warnings. We now have six months to work in earnest to bring full accountability to the process.

This distinction and the threats to national security were stated clearly by Admiral McConnell as well as four of the eight Democratic members of the Senate Intelligence Committee. These members, Senators Feinstein, Mikulski, Bayh, and Bill Nelson, have extensive experience on intelligence matters and are respected champions of civil rights and liberties. They chose to give significant weight and deference to the intelligence community on FISA reform, and so did I.

There is near uniform, bipartisan agreement on the need to reform FISA to reflect modern telecommunications and information technology. We must do so in a way that safeguards basic civil and constitutional rights. But we must also remember that the terrorist threat to the nation is extremely serious. I remain fully committed to bringing accountability to this process, and to protecting the privacy rights of all Americans.


Link found here

Don't panic. Congress just passed a bill that "concedes unprecedented authority" to the AG

Glenn Greenwald: Democrats' responsibility for Bush radicalism

Daily Kos diary about Webb's statement.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. the only good thing about that bill was the 120 day sunset provision
If the Republics refuse to listen to reason on oversight and the protection of civil liberties, then they can just sit on their hands and let the sun set.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 6 mos -- 180 days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buttercup McToots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Bastards...
THEY are all BASTARDS...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. it sounds that Webb only in concerned with technology reform in the future, nothing about civil
liberties being stepped on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. ...Shorter Webb: My senior Senators trust our President, and so do I.
I'm sorry, people. I'm not impressed.

He was brought a bill of goods and bought it without batting an eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. trust is so fragile
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Not impressed, either
My senator, Sherrod Brown, didn't buy into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. lazy and expedient...that's all
I wondered if Web would show his Republican belly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. I want less of government's idea of "protection" and more of my rights
Edited on Sat Aug-04-07 07:05 PM by Solly Mack
thanks all the same

"We must do so in a way that safeguards basic civil and constitutional rights. But we must also remember that the terrorist threat to the nation is extremely serious. I remain fully committed to bringing accountability to this process, and to protecting the privacy rights of all Americans."

Gonna give a wanna-be tyrant exactly what he wants first. A wanna-be tyrant who always lies and who has always abused whatever power he had - and then gonna work toward accountability after giving a wanna-be tyrant everything he wants...accountability from an executive office who wouldn't let a maid testify to Congress about what kind of cleaner she/he uses because of "executive privilege"?



alrighty then....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sure.....
These members, Senators Feinstein, Mikulski, Bayh, and Bill Nelson, have extensive experience on intelligence matters and are respected champions of civil rights and liberties.

Did they vote for the patriot act? For the Iraq war?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. If he runs for POTUS, will he apologize or stand by his vote?
He's on track for the "top tier".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Brilliant!! The politicians are taking away our civil liberites so the terrorists can't take them.
Up is down. Black is White. Big Brother loves you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. There was nothing wrong with FISA
It doesn't need to be fixed, what don't they get? Again they fall for the propaganda of this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. Lying jackass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. blah blah blah "National security" blah blah blah
Edited on Sat Aug-04-07 08:13 PM by high density
Gawd, please make it stop. Why can't these people notice that the Republics have already politicized this freaking issue?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. What is it
about "you work for US and we don't want you to allow Bu$hCo to spy on US" that the Senators can't seem to grasp??? I don't give a flying fu** what the Senate Intelligence Committee members think, I don't want my Government spying on me without Court over site, period!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC