GreatCaesarsGhost
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-06-07 10:24 AM
Original message |
novak on diane rehm show - covering his ass |
|
www.wamu.org
libby really didn't commit perjury. diane not swayed.
|
GreatCaesarsGhost
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-06-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message |
1. he feels let down by his colleagues in the media. |
|
feels they should have supported him more.
waiting for the callers.
|
devilgrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-06-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message |
2. He's spewing non-stop BULLSHIT and she's letting it slide.... |
|
uh oh, now she's calling him on it. But still, she's letting him blather unfettered. :shrug: It's Monday, I'm a little sensitive.
|
devilgrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-06-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
3. She asked him to state examples "liberal media bias"... |
|
He names the editorial pages of several newspapers (Chicago Tribune, KC Star, etc...) names the papers not specific examples - so FUCKING typical!
This guy is disgusting!!!!!!
|
supernova
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-06-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message |
4. She asked him to define "Liberal" |
|
He couldn't do it! :rofl:
|
GreatCaesarsGhost
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-06-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message |
5. "i don't label people as liberals i just describe them as liberals." |
supernova
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-06-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. If that's not a POS answer |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-06-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. By their fruits shall ye know them!. . . . . . n/t |
supernova
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-06-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. STILL claiming Valerie Plame was not covert!! |
|
STILL!
:banghead: :argh: :nuke:
|
devilgrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-06-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
8. This man is a ghoul - says * will become an icon in the future. |
|
Edited on Mon Aug-06-07 10:42 AM by devilgrrl
:eyes:
|
Staph
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-06-07 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. I think Novak has this one right. |
|
The OED defines an icon as "a sign that has characteristics in common with the thing it signified". In the future, Bush will be an icon of all of the wrong things in politics, an icon of failure of public service. Until a few years ago, that icon was Richard Nixon. Before him, it was Warren Harding; before him, Ulysses Grant or James Buchanan. But George W. Bush has achieved his legacy, his icon status, as a symbol of the worst in American politics and public life.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 03:12 AM
Response to Original message |