Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

With all this talk about security, remember Pelosi (as Speaker) is only assumed to be 2ed in line

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 10:53 AM
Original message
With all this talk about security, remember Pelosi (as Speaker) is only assumed to be 2ed in line
Edited on Thu Feb-08-07 10:54 AM by RGBolen
to the Presidency. The constitutional status of The Presidential Succession Act of 1947 placing people who in the constitution are expressly not "officers of the United States" in line for the presidency has not yet been determined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. I assume that that situation won't actually come up
Be interesting if it did, but i have to say I hope we can avoid it (assuming we can't get Bush impeached, of course).

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It could have most recently in 1981

The question of Bush not being in contact with the White House, thusly incapacitated from office. Tip O'Neil could have resigned to become acting President, and Al Haig could have walked right into the Supreme Court to file suit. Actually he could have just taken the oath of office from a judge the moment the cabinet voted that neither Reagan or Bush could execute the office. Both he and O'Neil could have taken oaths and there you go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. As far as I'm aware, it's never been challenged, and I doubt it really could be. NT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Of course it hasn't been challenged, no one has had standing to challenge it yet.
Edited on Thu Feb-08-07 11:14 AM by RGBolen
And I would bet it will be challenged the first time it is used, especially if it is a situation with differing parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC