Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wiretap Appeals Judge: "I feel like I'm in Alice & Wonderland"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 08:01 PM
Original message
Wiretap Appeals Judge: "I feel like I'm in Alice & Wonderland"
Edited on Wed Aug-15-07 08:21 PM by kpete
NSA Judge: 'I feel like I'm in Alice and Wonderland'
By Kevin Poulsen August 15, 2007 | 6:33:00 PMCategories: NSA

Ryan Singel and David Kravets are blogging the U.S. 9th Circuit hearing on the NSA's spying, and AT&T's alleged complicity, reporting live from the San Francisco courthouse.

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/08/nsa-hearing-ope.html

.............

As Kagro X explained this morning, the plaintiff's attorneys were forced to view the documents without being able to make any notes and had to write their briefs within the constant surveillance of the authorities (so wrong on so many levels), yet even after all this rigmarole, the government is now claiming that even attorney recollections are inadmissible because they can't be verified against the documents the government won't allow them to see.

Judge Hawkins (the third of the 3 judges on the Appellate Panel) is skeptical:

"Every ampersand, every comma is Top Secret?," Hawkins asks.

Yup, says Bondy:

"This document is totally non-redactable and non-segregable and cannot even be meaningfully described," Bondy answers.

The government says the purported log of calls between one of the Islamic charity directors and two American lawyers is classified Top Secret and has the SCI level, meaning that it is "secureCheshire compartmented information." That designation usually applies to surveillance information.

Then comes the Judicial money quote:

Judge McKeown: "I feel like I'm in Alice and Wonderland.".

This is the same Judge McKeown who had shown some skepticism about EFF's case earlier, so her exasperation here may be a good sign.

more at:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/8/15/183931/749
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. "nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"
Dismiss the government's case.

K&R!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. we are definitely through the looking glass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. full speed ahead
Taking apart our individual rights, day after day. Was this on cable? I didn't notice, not even sure Olbermann had it on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. The 9th Circuit did not cave today.
:applause::applause::applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. If only they were the SCOTUS, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. No kidding. I guess we'll find out just how big a whore Roberts is
if he's willing to undermine the Court in favor of the Unitary Idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. The Unitary Idiot! LOL, what a great phrase to coin. Shall I attribute it to you?
it made me laugh.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. marnieworld calls him "President Fredo".
That's my favorite. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. My favorite is still Mad Monkey King, to my shame I can't remember the DUer I heard it from. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. unfortuantely, I think we know already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. "the government attorney can't swear under oath that the Bush Administration isn't warrantlessly spy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yes, Cheney/Bush have taken us "Through The Looking Glass"
Edited on Wed Aug-15-07 09:10 PM by TahitiNut
In effect, they're asserting that some fundamental human rights and the civil liberties in exercising them accrue not to People, but to the government itself despite the fact that government is the entity seen as the threat to such liberties in writing the Bill of Rights.

Got that? :eyes:

Let's try again. :crazy:

The Cheney/Bush regime refuses to divulge information (the 'logic' of the 5th Amendment) to the People which incriminates the government. The protections, however, are designed to prohibit government from forcing People to divulge information. It's the Constitution turned inside out - "Through The Looking Glass."

Thus, in wholesale violation of the People's rights, Cheney/Bush, like the pirates they are, illicitly and illogically claim entitlement to the very protections they refuse to honor as required by the Constitution.

It's government on crack! Brain-fried. :banghead: 'The People' against the people. :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. We've been sucked down the rabbit hole for so long
maybe only a Dorothy/Alice/Xena coalition can lead us through!:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. I really liked the way you explained that, TN....
It makes me even madder than I already was.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. "... it can no longer be a secret."
Petard. Hoist.

Is this not the very 'logic' claimed by the fascist right in the case of Valerie Plame?? Did they not claim that nobody could be prosecuted under the IIPA since the secrecy of her role was already blown (by them, of course)??

That's just more "looking glass" logic. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. the queen would be so proud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yep ... she had her rose garden, too.
"Off with their heads!"


:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PRETZEL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. And from what I remember of Judge Bates' decision
that was one of the reasons why he felt the Plame's suit should be dismissed. If I remember correctly for them to have standing would have meant that either her cover was still secret or that the Wilson's would have to prove that others already have had their cover blown in order to prove that she had her cover blown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Appointed by Bush* in 2001 to the District Court, he was then appointed to the FISA Court in 2006
... no doubt due to his handling (dismissal) of Walker v. Cheney. It came as no surprise to me that he dismissed Plame v. Cheney, too.

His (specious) 'logic' was that anything ("no matter how unsavory") the administration does under the cover of "official duties" is immune from civil liability. It's the same "Through The Looking Glass" non-Euclidean 'logic' used by all the rabid neocons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. yep, me too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
16. That's soooooooooo "pre-9/11"
Due Process, that is. Nice quaint little notion.

:sarcasm:

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
17. Well, Judge, smash the freaking Looking Glass. Smash it in to little bitty
pieces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brigid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. 1984.
George Orwell was a prophet. He just got the date a little wrong. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. my guess on the content of the secret docs:
"BUSH AND CHENEY DID (redact)/11! OH, AND STOLE BOTH (redacted)! HERE IS THE PROOF...
(redacted)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
22. WTF is "Alice and Wonderland" ?
stiil, that's not as bad as "Allison Wonderland"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-16-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. LOL. I guess it's been a long time since he read the book
or saw the cartoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC