Laura PourMeADrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-21-07 04:58 AM
Original message |
3 reasons to vote for Edwards! And this is a BLUE state !! |
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-21-07 05:03 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Hi, Laura Pack Your Bags. I saw the graphics there and thought how |
|
close elections tend to be in Wisconsin. I remember the Jimmy Carter/Mo Udall primary contest. That was an interesting race in Wisconsin.
And the rise of Russ Feingold.
Edwards seems to have a slight lead over Ghouliani, and Clinton and Obama are very close. I'm hoping Wisconsin gets bluer and bluer as 2008 gets closer and closer.
|
Laura PourMeADrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-21-07 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. You are right - excpt Edwards has a clear lead over Rudy |
|
10 points looks good to me. I don't think Edwards is offensive to Repukes, do you?
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-21-07 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I can't speak for Repukes, thank god, but I agree -- he is more palatable |
|
to a general electorate and would draw some Republican votes, especially from the Republicans who were Republicans before 1992. The pre-Gingrich Republicans, in other words.
I'm not sure how that shakes out in Wisconsin. How did someone as thuggish and thick as Tommy Thompson get elected governor there? There must be dairy cows smarter than Tommy Thompson. Correction -- there most certain ARE dairy cows smarter than Tommy Thompson.
On one hand there's Russ Feingold, one of the true progressives, and then on the other is a clueless chunk of concrete like Tommy.
It's puzzlin', I tell ya.
|
jgraz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-21-07 05:04 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Wisconsin's pretty purple |
|
Actually, it's solid blue in Mad-town, bluish-purple in Milwaukee, and deep red most other places with a few blue dots of aging hippie communes sprinkled in randomly.
|
Laura PourMeADrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-21-07 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. you're right - kerry didn't win by much - but then, if you add in |
WhiteTara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-21-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
11. when they get "Katrina-ed" will they feel |
marions ghost
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-21-07 05:18 AM
Response to Original message |
|
figures for Dems against Romney, or was Giuliani significantly ahead?
|
B Calm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-21-07 05:45 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Well this will upset Karl Rove! He's betting on Hillary.. |
Perry Logan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-21-07 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. And you believe everything Karl Rove says? I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you... |
B Calm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-21-07 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Its understandable why he's campaigning against her, he wants |
|
her as the democratic nominee. As you can see by the opening post above, she can be beat!
|
usregimechange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-21-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message |
usregimechange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-21-07 03:10 PM
Response to Original message |
Lex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-21-07 03:13 PM
Response to Original message |
13. It seems like Edwards is gathering steam as more people scrutinize |
|
Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 01:36 PM
Response to Original message |