Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What bugs me about the Larry Craig case...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:22 PM
Original message
What bugs me about the Larry Craig case...
The police report begins with ole Larry eyeballing the officer through the stall crack.

Now, either one of two things are true:

1.) Senator Larry Craig routinely peeks through stall doors hoping to pick up the odd partner.

2.) A WHOLE lot of come-hither enticement went on trying to bait Larry into the his later actions.

Now, since Larry doesn't walk around with busted teeth and black eyes, I'm going to guess it's 2.

So it probably was a police sting operation. Now, that leads to several more choices:

1.) A whole lot of aggressive gays were cruising that bathroom and complaints led to the police doing a sting.

2.) Someone has it out for gays in the police force.

3.) Larry has more enemies that we here imagine.

4.) :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wuy does 1) or 2) need to be true. They could both easily be false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What's your scenario? Once in a blue moon he peeks through stall doors...
Edited on Wed Aug-29-07 05:29 PM by Junkdrawer
and he just happened to pick a stall with a cop? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. How big was the cop's nightstick?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Given how some NY cops used their nightsticks on Amadou Dialo, I can't laugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes, it's possible....
... he picked a bathroom that was popular for anonymous gay sex right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Is that what they're saying in the news?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. So, you went from reasoned opinion to helpless hypothesizer?
:shrug: right back atcha. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Huh?
I'm just tring to get a handle on what went down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #11
35. So to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I don't know what they're saying in the news. I'm just saying your premise isn't sound....
.... hence your conclusio0n may be shaky as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I think you're missing something. There had been complaints about
sex going on in those restrooms, so a cop was there undercover.

The cop wasn't random - he was placed in a known cruising spot. And Craig was cruising in a known cruising spot.

Nothing random about it - which doesn't mean the cop enticed him at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Also, thanks.
:hi:

It just strikes me as odd that an airport restroom is a cruising spot. I guess it's possible, it's just odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #18
36. I believe in that room...
it's called the "inch-high club." (For people who are afraid of heights and/or planes.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. What bugs me is that the same day he copped a plea, he voted against censuring Gonzales.
Edited on Wed Aug-29-07 05:34 PM by BleedingHeartPatriot
What also bugs me is that he voted against gay marriage, but seems just fine with gay sex.

And, it bugs me that he called out Bill Clinton as a "nasty boy" on Meet the Press.

Now, if there was entrapment, he could have called his lawyer and plead not guilty.

A sitting United States Senator claiming that Constitutional law was violated. He could have won in a "cakewalk".

He didn't call his lawyer and he plead guilty.

Why?

MKJ


edited to add, and all this happened on the way to the vote. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Well, "they entrapped me with the handsome officer"....
was clearly non-choice if he wanted to hide his sexual preferences...

Not apologizing for Larry, just wondering why the sting...and also wondering how aggressive the sting was...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. As the Senator chose to "hide his sexual preference" he was running Romney's campaign.
jd, this is your M.O., I hesitated to respond, because it was you.

I won't make that mistake twice. MKJ

Maybe I should have a sigline which reads, there I go again, ascribing honorable intentions where there are none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. According to the Police Report, It Was Definitely a Sting.
The police set up the operation in the bathroom specifically because they said they had received a number of complaints about gay cruising there. So 1) is probably true, and 2) is possibly true.

And you're right: if the guy in the stall had not been a cop trying to make a bust, and had instead been just your average Joe Breeder, he would have signaled his displeasure at Craig looking in on him long before two minutes had passed, if not gotten violent with him. People tend to overlook the fact that that the straight guy in question was a police officer trying to give Craig enough rope to hang himself, which is what happened. No one who didn't want Craig's attention would have held Craig's attention for long: he knows how the game is played, and so did the officer, which is why he did NOTHING to discourage Craig. If the guy hadn't been a cop, things would not have progressed to the toe-tapping stage, let alone the toe-touching stage or the hand under the stall.

Regardless of the stupidity the law or moral ambiguity of stings like this, what Craig did is illegal, and he was legally arrested. More importantly, he's a self-loathing hypocritical asshole who intentionally made life unfair for gay Americans across the country while engaging in gay activities himself. He deserves whatever he gets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Thanks.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coco77 Donating Member (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. When everyone starts listing the sex scandals..
don't forget the repuke who was working on someones campaign I think mc cains, who was having oral sex on the man while he was sleeping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. It was the national chairman of the Young Republicans.
MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. supposedly that restroom was publicized on an adult
website as the place to find anonymous sex in MN.

In that case, Larry was merely well prepared for his business trip having researched the locale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Weird....
Was it a little used men's room out of the way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I know nothing of mens' restrooms
I saw it in a news story from one of the ID papers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. There are publicized lists of such spots. I'm sure you can look them up online.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Yes, there is a site
I was going to post a link but the first page shows a lot of nudity so I decided to spare everyone. But yes, there is a site you can go to to find the local cruising spots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Not at all.
It's the men's bathroom in the central area of the terminal, where all the concourses come together in a kind of mini-shopping mall; there are a number of restaurants and rather upscale shops nearby, so it's not in an out-of-the way or seedy area. It's inside the security checkpoints so the people who use that restroom are all passengers, probably waiting for connecting flights. Apparently it's a known "cruising" spot -- at least 15 years ago a gay friend told me it was one of the prime locations in this area for that sort of thing (that was before you had to go through security to get to it).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. Oh please...
I'm a little more than tired of all the Craig apologists today.

He is scum. He has a long history of being scum. He was caught red-handed being scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Sigh...I laughed my ass off watching Craig's presser...
I clearly missed the part in the news about all the complaints that led to the sting.

But, to tell the truth, it still strikes me as passing odd that a public airport men's room was a know gay cruising spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. You're kidding, right?
I've been warned about airport restrooms since I was a kid! And certain park restrooms around town too! I didn't know about these supposed "signals" though... guess I'm not in the loop for such things:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Not kidding...and, in 1979, I worked across the street from the spot...
where Limbaugh supposedly picked up gay partners. It took a while before I realized why all the cars would slow down while I was waiting for the bus after work.

As you say, not in the loop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Hahaha!
And you thought they were just being friendly:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-29-07 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
30. It was horrible bad luck
He just happened to get detective Mancuso who has been haunting the Min-St Paul airport in disguise since the NO bus station likely no longer exists. At least Mancuso finally found his weirdo... Otherwise, I was not really surprised to see the 'R' after the name 'Craig', were you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
31. bad luck, like that poor repug in FL who offered $20 to blow an undercover cop
who was just in there going potty, not staking out the john!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
32. No need to guess
It has been reported that there were complaints about cruising that led police to conduct sting.
And it seems pretty obvious that Craig was engaged in a familiar routine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Exactly
...it seems pretty obvious that Craig was engaged in a familiar routine.

From the details I've read, he is clearly an old hand at this sort of thing. It didn't take any entrapment on anyone else's part; Craig was in there for only one purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
34. Craig's reasons for peeping, footsie, and reaching are (imho) IMMATERIAL and IRRELEVANT
A Peeping Tom is a Peeping Tom. If someone is caught peeping into other people's windows, I really don't care what their sexual orientation (if any) is. Craig engaged in behavior that meets "Disorderly Conduct" criteria. All the rest seems to be prurient interest.

Disclaimer: I'm not above or against a little "prurient interest" - it's just that it's irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC