Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Partial Progress Towards Progress Towards Progress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 08:03 AM
Original message
Partial Progress Towards Progress Towards Progress
Partial Progress Towards Progress Towards Progress
Jon Soltz
Posted September 4, 2007 | 07:37 PM (EST)


The Government Accountability Office report was released today, and it quickly became evident where the White House pressured for change from the original version leaked to the Washington Post.

In last week's Washington Post story, it was reported that the GAO study would say that Iraqis have failed to meet 15 of 18 benchmarks. In today's report, the GAO sticks with only three benchmarks met, but now has a new grade for benchmarks: "Partially met."

I want to make clear, I think the GAO report is a strong and sobering look at Iraq, and far more truthful than what the White House has been shoveling to the American people for years. But, I have to question what this "partial" grade is.

For instance, one benchmark is "Allocating and spending $10 billion in Iraqi revenues for reconstruction projects, including delivery of essential services, on an equitable basis." Originally marked as unmet, it's now marked as "partially met," because, "Funds allocated, but unlikely to be fully spent."


~snip~

Sooooo, wouldn't that mean the benchmark is not met? Call me crazy, but sounds like you either meet benchmarks or don't, and this is one that's not been met.

So, let's be clear here. As the Washington Post originally reported, only three benchmarks have been met. Fifteen have not. That Iraqis are so far flunking here is just more evidence that the surge has not worked, and that there is no military solution to this problem. Troops can't make Iraqis allocate and spend $10 billion, or any of the other things listed in the benchmarks. As we've said since the start of VoteVets.org, troops can't bring the parties together to solve these internal Iraqi problems that are keeping the country from reconciliation.


Rest of article at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jon-soltz/partial-progress-towards-_b_63083.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-05-07 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. there's only 1 benchmark that counts: iraq signing over their resources to american extraction corps
that's what the US military is fighting for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC