|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 02:35 PM Original message |
Regarding yesterday's LOOSE NUKES story!!! Important update! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musette_sf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMDemDist2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. excellent research, K&N n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
3. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
4. Thanks, I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
5. Hmmm. Sending them over to use on Iran, maybe???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EnricoFermi (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
122. Well, it could be said that they are there just in case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
6. Considering what we NOW know about these weapons... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 10:12 AM Response to Reply #6 |
114. and the GoP/Media Establishment is a-buzz about Thompson and Obama/O |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zywiec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
7. The UK intercepted 8 Russian bombers yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 02:54 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I stand corrected... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 12:05 AM Response to Reply #12 |
82. NATO Jets are also "escorting" Russian bombers as per this story... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 12:22 PM Response to Reply #82 |
119. Dr Strangelove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
8. You may want to note that early reports said five |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 02:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I noticed that too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
9. K&R! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
10. Probably some headline-based sabre rattling from our side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superkia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 06:26 PM Response to Reply #10 |
45. I like your idea better than the other options. Could be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 11:51 PM Response to Reply #45 |
80. It's the only theory that fits all the circumstances, imo n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CGowen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
13. I would really like to know what is not on the "UNCLASSIFIED TABLE OF CONTENTS" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rosesaylavee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
14. Kick and Rec |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
15. I agree, this story is messed up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. USAF 2nd Munitions Squardron is located there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 03:38 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. No, Barksdale has nothing to do with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 04:02 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Exactly WHERE did you see that info? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 04:12 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. The Military Times story has NO reference to your claim. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
17. Your research is deeply flawed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 03:55 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. We DO have 400-500 ACMs, BUT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 04:06 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Thanks for finding this, Rick! I appreciate you sharing these FACTS with us. recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. I won't pretend to know what you know about all of this, but as a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ptvet (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 04:20 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Good info Rick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. I had a former SAC pilot for a base commander back in the 70's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 10:25 PM Response to Reply #33 |
72. Damn... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 09:42 PM Response to Reply #24 |
63. EXACTLY!! I was an electrician on B-52s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ptvet (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 11:50 PM Response to Reply #63 |
79. Yeah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 05:57 PM Response to Reply #19 |
42. Please note the USAF doc DOES say there are 394 in inventory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 06:28 PM Response to Reply #19 |
46. well played! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 10:21 PM Response to Reply #19 |
69. I like all the mindless "Good job!" replies you got to this, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
124. Number of missiles and mistakes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obiwan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 09:42 PM Response to Reply #17 |
62. WE do have 400 to 500 ACM's but only 38 are of the TYPE described in the story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:23 AM Response to Reply #62 |
100. Yes, only 38 are slated for refitting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 10:22 PM Response to Reply #17 |
70. With Ricky Rick here. No solo ops wit de nukes. NEVER. No mistake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
25. Some anti-tinfoil. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Why the hell would we attack Iran with OUR MOST OBSOLETE NUCLEAR EQUIPMENT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Sometimes I don't know what's tongue-in-cheek. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 06:04 PM Response to Reply #26 |
44. Don't rule it out! I know it sounds insane, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phrogman (940 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 01:00 AM Response to Reply #44 |
83. Hell, I help load the bombs on the B-52's in Diego Garcia during Desert Storm, they were all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
followthemoney (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 10:49 AM Response to Reply #83 |
116. Maybe that's how thesen weapons were to be decommissioned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kermitt Gribble (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 08:06 PM Response to Reply #26 |
52. Maybe.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:15 AM Response to Reply #52 |
94. Nuclear weapons are somewhat traceable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davekriss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 07:22 PM Response to Reply #94 |
135. Well lessee' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dangerously Amused (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 08:49 PM Response to Reply #26 |
58. WHY the hell would we attack Iran with OUR MOST OBSOLETE NUCLEAR EQUIPMENT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:12 AM Response to Reply #58 |
93. Quite simply, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diclotican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 10:09 AM Response to Reply #93 |
113. Kelly Rupert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UnyieldingHierophant (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 10:49 AM Response to Reply #93 |
117. actually, it's approx. 10,000..not counting tactical* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 04:55 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. I had a detailed rebuttal prepped when IE died on me! Grr! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 05:55 PM Response to Reply #31 |
41. Counterpoints. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 06:04 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Were just splitting hairs. I've corrected some of the OP, however, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 10:24 PM Response to Reply #43 |
71. The whole story does indeed reek. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obiwan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 09:45 PM Response to Reply #25 |
64. They are being moved to update their guidance systems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:21 AM Response to Reply #64 |
98. Yes. In fact, I referenced that in each of the first few paragraphs I wrote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
28. What is the name of the top guy that was fired? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. He's the 5th Munitions Squadron commander |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Damn I sure would like to know who that was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 05:10 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. Only thing I can find is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrotherBuzz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
32. So six missiles are being upgraded with electronics... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sce56 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 10:48 PM Response to Reply #32 |
76. As I recall bunker busters are a new idea a cruise missile is not hardened enough for this attack! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrotherBuzz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 02:59 AM Response to Reply #76 |
87. Rummy pushed for the Double Super Secret (wink wink, nod nod) nuclear bunker buster in 2003 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:24 AM Response to Reply #87 |
102. When was it tested? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucognizant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 02:25 PM Response to Reply #102 |
126. Gee wizz........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrotherBuzz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 08:38 PM Response to Reply #102 |
136. The Advanced Simulation and Computing Program (ASC) has been working for fifteen years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sce56 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 08:45 PM Response to Reply #87 |
137. I was saying that the ALCM's are not for bunker busting! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
34. Things Are Looking Really Bad Right Now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 05:17 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. The Jerusalem Times claims they dropped their external fuel tanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 06:36 PM Response to Reply #36 |
48. It Took Them A Little Time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sofa king (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 08:55 PM Response to Reply #36 |
59. That's not a regular tactic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obiwan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 09:50 PM Response to Reply #34 |
65. Kinda like the Cold War of the 50's and 60's , ey? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aviation Pro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 09:59 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. That was Hayden Sterling..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roxnev (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
37. Scary as hell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
klyon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 06:22 AM Response to Reply #37 |
89. yes it is scary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neuvocat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
38. Some more info for anyone interested: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 05:35 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. The AF data sheet claims there are 400+ in stock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
40. UPDATE to Original Post (correction) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
minnesota_liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 07:26 AM Response to Reply #40 |
90. Interesting find, but not the smoking gun - er, cruise missile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
47. brrrr , it just got cold in here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 10:03 PM Response to Reply #47 |
67. Sorry another dupe. Damn this lappypot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
debbierlus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
49. Thank you for your research & keeping the media alive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
50. Mistakes happen, esp. in organizations. The USA killed a cow with a nuclear bomb once. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 07:41 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Back then, the fissile core was removed for transit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 12:30 PM Response to Reply #51 |
121. AEC: "Inadvertent Explosion: ... accidents might occur..." Thanks for this link! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 08:10 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. And there's some lizards saying "Get rid of airplane bathrooms!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Voltaire99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
53. No mystery where they were being taken... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 08:23 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. I'd approve the use of a 5kt nuke as a stage effect!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeGist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
56. false flag attack ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:37 AM Response to Reply #56 |
108. False flag attacks usually require attacks. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StClone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
57. How they can get away with it: Nuke on Nuke? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 09:01 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. Keep in mind these weapons (the W-80) can be adjusted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:20 AM Response to Reply #57 |
96. This way, no matter what we hit we can point at the radiation released |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:43 AM Response to Reply #96 |
110. Only if the Iranians had managed to acquire all their uranium from North America n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StClone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 02:18 PM Response to Reply #96 |
125. That was part of my thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bosso 63 (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
61. Anyway you look at this, its not good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
68. I have been in a state of alarm since I first heard the bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rick Myers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
73. thread continues here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
74. You really got to ask yourself, why do you think they allowed this story to be leaked?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:22 AM Response to Reply #74 |
99. That depends. Who was first to get the story? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:29 AM Response to Reply #74 |
105. I don't think it's a matter of "allowed." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burrowowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
75. GOOD RESEARCH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jesse Hemingway (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
77. Good work; here is some follow up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrightKnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
78. The USAF knows how to handle nukes without error. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jesse Hemingway (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 11:54 PM Response to Reply #78 |
81. No one is suppose to know their doing it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:17 AM Response to Reply #78 |
95. This would be the absolute least effective saber rattling in history. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrightKnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 10:06 PM Response to Reply #95 |
138. saber rattling could be cover for domestic political fallout games. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrat2thecore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 01:09 AM Response to Original message |
84. You summed it up right here.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
85. It's not the missiles...it's the nuclear war heads..You don't mention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
86. There won't be a peep about this from our party leadership. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Delphinus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 06:05 AM Response to Original message |
88. Gulp! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 07:40 AM Response to Original message |
91. Thanks for the update. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Holly_Hobby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
92. Remember when China was accused of hacking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:26 AM Response to Reply #92 |
103. Please expand this theory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UnyieldingHierophant (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 10:51 AM Response to Reply #92 |
118. They "hacked" the unclass network, superficially at best...that capability doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
97. This leak was not accidental, so we were meant to see it. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:27 AM Response to Reply #97 |
104. Because this is horribly embarrassing, and someone peripherally involved in it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:32 AM Response to Reply #104 |
106. It's easy to believe the people in this administration are that incompetent... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:36 AM Response to Reply #106 |
107. This has nothing to do with the administration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:45 AM Response to Reply #107 |
111. You don't think this administration has affected the military power structure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:59 AM Response to Reply #111 |
112. The influence this administration holds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 10:28 AM Response to Reply #112 |
115. They know who they can trust with what. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
101. Larry Johnson might have a clue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 09:38 AM Response to Reply #101 |
109. If I had a quarter for each "OMG There Will Be An Attack On This Date" post on DU, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dora (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
120. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
123. A modification to make them bunker-bustering, perhaps? As for the five vs. six, it was six. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bearware (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
127. How many of the officers were Dominionist Christians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 03:38 PM Response to Reply #127 |
130. Excellent points, Bearwear! And, hey... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
128. Fallout Continues From Bomber Flight (new article) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bearware (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #128 |
129. Have they checked the warheads to see if they are real? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 03:44 PM Response to Reply #129 |
131. It says to me that, opposite to what some are trying to say, this incident |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bearware (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #131 |
132. I'm wondering if they switched the nukes for fakes in the 10 hours |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimshoes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 06:49 PM Response to Reply #132 |
133. I've been having the same recurring thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 07:14 PM Response to Reply #132 |
134. Ahhh, now I get what you were saying..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 04:22 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC