Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Forest Service chief: Use trees to power cars

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 10:49 PM
Original message
Forest Service chief: Use trees to power cars
Forest Service chief: Use trees to power cars
Kimbell proposes using wood- and brush-based ethanol as gas alternative


Updated: 37 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Forest Service chief is proposing replacing 15 percent of the nation's gasoline with ethanol made from wood, while doubling the amount of carbon dioxide emissions absorbed by public and private forests.

"These are ambitious goals, and they would take a concerted national effort to reach," Forest Service Chief Abigail Kimbell said in remarks prepared for a speech before the Society of Environmental Journalists Friday night in San Francisco.

They also appear contradictory. But such a plan is consistent with President Bush's goal cutting gasoline use by 20 percent while expanding reliance on ethanol, which is a central part of his energy policy. He has sent Congress a proposal mandating the use of 35 billion gallons a year of "alternative" fuels, mostly ethanol, by 2017.

Kimbell said that "with the technologies now becoming available, we could replace as much as 15 percent of our current gasoline consumption with ethanol from wood -- and not just any wood, but wood that is not now being used for other purposes."

snip...
Asked how the nation could churn out vastly more wood for ethanol while rapidly growing more forests, Kimbell's spokeswoman, Allison Stewart, said in an interview Friday night that the wood for ethanol would come mainly from brush that the Bush administration's "healthy forests" law now requires to be thinned to prevent wildfires.

"A lot of our forests across our country are unhealthy because they're overstocked. There's a lot of unhealthy underbrush," Stewart said. "That's where we're talking about getting the bio-energy from. It's from the reduction of flammable fuels in the forests -- instead of just burning it up in piles or grinding it up."

more...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20650013



President Bush speaks about cellulosic ethanol made from spruce wood chips during a tour of a biotechnology company in Franklinton, N.C., in February. Forest Service Chief Abigail Kimbell says the U.S. should replace 15 percent of its gasoline with ethanol made from wood and brush cleared from forests.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. The lard from Dick Cheney's fat ass would power 12,500 cars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datadiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, now that make sense
:crazy: Cut down more trees, create more global warming by doing so. If it was just brush you could understand it but you know that is not what they are talking about. Thin out the forests instead of cleaning up the mess underneath the trees caused by years of not letting nature takes its course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-07-07 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. sort of like cutting out your lungs to keep your heart beating
for a few more minutes. You can't live without either and the earth has to be viewed as any other biological being. You can't tear up one part of the being without affecting the health of that being. You'll most likely kill it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-08-07 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Forest Service is in the Department of Agriculture for a reason
The Forest Service operates under a "sustainable multi-use management concept." One of the uses of the forest land they manage is cropland--specifically, "forest products" such as lumber, paper and...yes, cellulosic ethanol.

It's not politically correct around here to suggest growing trees for harvest is a good thing, but consider the poplar. There's no such thing as "old growth" poplar because the tree grows to immense size in a very short period of time--harvestable for firewood in five years, for pulp or cellulosic ethanol in eight years, for lumber in ten. It is a very effective carbon sink. It will grow anywhere in the US, and when you cut one down IT GROWS BACK!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC