Archae
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 03:08 PM
Original message |
Anti-Clinton bimbo crawls out of the sewer again... |
|
Yup, another anti-Clinton bimbo with no credibility shows up again. http://mediamatters.org/items/200709080003?f=h_latest
|
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message |
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
2. "The Clintons stole my manuscript!" - as if anyone wanted to read her "book" |
Bitwit1234
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I had to laugh about that one but |
|
just think of all the people who believed her first attempt at attention. Now why in the world would either of the Clintons break into her house, or sanction anyone breaking into her house.
Most of the people didn't believe her in the first place why would they go along with this trash. Only Fox and rush.
|
Archae
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. WingNutDaily, The Pillhead and Faux believe her... |
|
Then again, what do you expect from a bunch of right-wing shit spewers...
|
Rock_Garden
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 03:15 PM
Response to Original message |
4. One thing you can always count on.... |
|
is that these kinds of people always go too far. So, in the end, they always get discredited.
|
book_worm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Give it up already, FAUX news.
|
Kingofalldems
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 03:27 PM
Response to Original message |
7. There's a Tweety story revolving around her |
|
I don't remember, but it involved Pat Buchanan's brother. Anyone?
|
Archae
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. Willey named the guy who (supposedly) threatened her... |
|
And PukeKKKanan's certifiable crazy brother attacked the guy's house.
|
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 03:31 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Well, this will only increase if Hillary Clinton is nominated -- meaningless . .. . |
|
but it will go on and on -- replaying the Clinton "penis" impeachment ---
|
Chipper Chat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
What was actually "stolen" was Willey's personal copy of MY PET GOAT signed by Chucklenuts.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 03:41 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Eight more years of this shit |
|
Truth or lies, nothing brings them out of the woodwork like the Clintons.
|
The River
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
I wish they would just retire or march in place.(She's an "ok" Senator) Clintons perceived baggage (true, false, real or imagined) would turn the 08 election into a mud slinging personality contest. The Repubs have no policy based chance in hell. All they have is name calling and personality smears. Guess who the biggest of all possible targets is?
|
AlGore-08.com
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. And the folks on the other side - - and far too many others - - will believe stuff like this |
|
Thank God nothing important is happening in the world (like the climate system breaking down) so we can afford to loose this next election...
|
Karmadillo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
16. Eight more years of this shit only if the Dems win. Whoever we nominate will be tormented |
|
by lunatics and smear artists drummed up by the rightwing and their media abettors. If not Hillary, then Obama, and if not Obama, then Edwards and on and on and on it goes. If being subject to Republican smears is a bar to the nomination, we won't be able to nominate anyone (except the Republican nominee).
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. Edwards and Obama will fight for me |
|
Hillary just gives lip service to the poor, if that. She won't promise universal health care in her first term. We don't gain anything from putting up with the smears against her. That's the difference.
|
Karmadillo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
20. Nope. Hillary will fight even for you, no matter how much you |
|
repeat the Ralph Nader mantra that there's no difference between Hillary and the Republicans.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. She won't promise universal health care |
|
in her first term. She has spoken out of both sides of her mouth on outsourcing, particularly to India. She won't promise a real change in foreign policy.
And where did I accuse her for being no different than Republicans?
|
Karmadillo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
23. "We don't gain anything..." |
|
If she's different from the Republicans, we will gain something.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
24. We gain more with Edwards and Obama |
|
Why don't you deal with what I said instead of manufactured smears.
|
Karmadillo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
|
Why don't you say what you mean so you won't have to backtrack later?
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
|
Again, why don't you deal with the issues of change instead of attacking me.
|
Karmadillo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-08-07 05:31 PM by Karmadillo
If you say we gain nothing from having Hillary in the White House, you should expect someone to point out you're sounding like Ralph Nader in 2000.
On Edit: took out some words and put others in
|
fedupfisherman
(318 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
Karmadillo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
28. You can start with this link. |
fedupfisherman
(318 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
fedupfisherman
(318 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
Nobody riles up the wingnuts quite like the Clintons
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 03:59 PM
Response to Original message |
13. "The Clenus ate my homework." (Where've I heard that before?) |
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 04:21 PM
Response to Original message |
14. And who was it here that told me in no uncertain terms that there |
|
was NOTHING the insane right could come up with that Hillary has not already dealt with?
Sure, it's all bullshit, but that won't stop them from flinging it.
THIS is why Hillary will not win if nominated. There is a bottemless well of hatred out there - this "stolen manuscript" story will circulate long after Willey admits there was never a manuscript to begin with.
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Let me guess, you're male.
|
hedgehog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message |
21. What if a Republican stole the manuscript hoping to get a head start |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-08-07 05:20 PM
Response to Original message |
26. EIGHT more years? Try FOREVER. I keep hearing about Chappaquiddick (38 yrs ago). |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:15 PM
Response to Original message |