Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT editorial: Restore "one of the most powerful weapons against tyranny in democracy's arsenal"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:37 AM
Original message
NYT editorial: Restore "one of the most powerful weapons against tyranny in democracy's arsenal"
Restoring American Justice
Published: September 17, 2007

In 2006, acting in reckless haste before an election, 65 senators and 250 members of the House defied the Constitution, endangered the safety of American soldiers and hurt the nation’s global reputation by passing the Military Commissions Act. The law created a separate, substandard and clearly unconstitutional system of trial and punishment for foreigners. This week Congress has a chance to begin fixing that grievous mistake.

The Senate is expected to consider a measure that would reverse one of the worst aspects of the 2006 law — the suspension of the right of habeas corpus, the ancient principle that no governing power may lock people up without the chance for a hearing in a court of law. The protection from arbitrary arrest, embedded in the Magna Carta and in the Constitution of the United States, is one of the most powerful weapons against tyranny in democracy’s arsenal. Before President Bush, only one American president suspended habeas corpus — Abraham Lincoln, during the Civil War — and the Supreme Court duly struck down that arrogation of power.

In 2004, the Supreme Court again affirmed habeas corpus, declaring that Mr. Bush had no right to revoke the rules of civilized justice at his whim for hundreds of foreigners he declared “illegal enemy combatants.” But Mr. Bush was determined to avoid judicial scrutiny of the extralegal system of prisons he created after the Sept. 11 attacks. With the help of his allies on Capitol Hill, he railroaded the habeas corpus suspension through the Republican-controlled Congress.

The administration’s disinformation machine portrayed the debate as a fight between tough-minded conservatives who wanted to defeat terrorism and addled liberals who would coddle the worst kinds of criminals. It was nothing of the kind. There is nothing conservative about expressing contempt for the Constitution by denying judicial procedure to prisoners who happen not to be Americans. A long list of conservatives, including Bob Barr, a former Republican congressman; David Keene, chairman of the American Conservative Union; and William Sessions, a former federal judge and F.B.I. director under the first President Bush, support the reinstatement of habeas corpus for the prisoners of the so-called war on terror....

***

Harry Reid, the Senate majority leader, must ensure a vote on the habeas corpus restoration measure sponsored by Patrick Leahy, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Arlen Specter, its ranking Republican....

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/17/opinion/17mon1.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. A local guy confessed he attended an underground training camp
where they trained to pole vault over rivers.

It was a big score for the Global War on Terror.

All suspects with less substantiating evidence against them, we can just warehouse, under the present understanding, with physical plant services provided by Halliburton, under contractual terms that are a matter of national security, because terrorists could manipulate world markets by betting against how much Halliburton can pull this off for (including their ability to manipulate the law regarding said liability).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. You mean IMPEACHMENT?
Dang, disappointed after reading past the title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. I have a bad attitude. The NYT Editorial page can cry me a river.
They sat on the illegal wiretapping story WHILE they told us there was no story in Ohio 2004.

What's changed since then? Is their ad buy so fallen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yuh think? That would be nice.
They lied their asses off. Over and over and over and over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Foreigners? Railroaded?
What are these idiots smoking? This law applies to US, and there isn't a whole lot of enthusiasm for striking it down.

A year ago, I would of thought that if these people could challenge the charges against them, Bushco would be finished due to imprisoning random people it didn't like.

Now, I know the truth- that just doesn't bother many people. "Padilla was given due process!" Uh, sure...you can keep that "due process" away from me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't understand why this wasn't first on the agenda after '06 victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not this country, we left Democracy off the table in 2000.
The only arsenal we have now is an 'all day sucker' and rock candy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC