"It's clear that this question about her vote -- and its frequent repetition -- is irritating not only to Senator Clinton, but to many of her supporters. However, there's a reason it keeps coming up: she hasn't given a good answer.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/2/11/04359/5889By that I don't mean "she hasn't given the answer I want to hear," I mean that the implications of her answer go beyond her unwillingness to voice the word "mistake" in reference to her vote. Worst of all, her answers show that she either can't manage to, or refuses to, grasp the real nature of the question.
In asking for a repudiation of that 2002 vote, the issue is not if she would vote the same way today knowing that all the claims of WMDs and ties to al Qaeda were false. Few politicians – and no Democrat I'm aware of -- would be foolish enough to make that statement. Neither is the issue the president's mismanagement of the war, which is so little in doubt that the administration itself is now grudgingly confessing some sins.
No. This question, this irritating question that some people just won't let go, isn't a check for 20-20 hindsight. Neither is it a request for judgment on the administration's effectiveness in matters strategic or tactical. The question, Senator Clinton, is have you learned anything? Have you learned that to authorize war is always a last resort, not a first, or seventh, or seven times seventh. Have you learned that it's not okay to allow fear – including fear for your career in politics – to herd you along with the crowd. Have you learned that good judgment isn't just avoiding error. it's acknowledging that an error has been made and working promptly to correct it.
We're not worried about your refusal to say you were wrong. We're worried that you still might think you were right. And that, Senator, is a problem."