Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

N.D. Senate OKs cohabitation law change

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Dracos Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 08:54 AM
Original message
N.D. Senate OKs cohabitation law change
- Living together out of wedlock would be downgraded from a sex crime to fraud, and then only if the couple claims to be married, under a proposal that passed the state Senate on Friday.
The bill was changed from an outright repeal of the state's anti-cohabitation law. The amended proposal would make the false representation of marital status a misdemeanor crime for a man and woman who live together.
Cohabiting couples who do not falsely claim marriage would not be penalized.The proposal now goes to the state house.Full Story :
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070210/ap_on_re_us/living_in_sin;_ylt=Asm9IV4FnexU4QBgz_4RkoHMWM0F
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. So, there's no "married in the eyes of God(s)" in ND?
<sigh>

What is this world coming to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. it says noting about 'common law"

Since statehood, North Dakota has barred unmarried couples from "openly and notoriously" living together as if they were married. It is one of seven states with anti-cohabitation laws.

The punishment would be the same, with a maximum 30 days in jail and a $1,000 fine. But the proposal would remove the blanket ban on cohabitation, which has not been prosecuted in years, and its listing among other sex crimes, including rape and child sexual abuse.

"This is, in fact, the 21st century, and I believe it's time to put to rest this 19th-century legislation," said state Sen. Tracy Potter.

"If people are more comfortable in this wording, I have no problem, but I don't think it changes anything," said Sen. Tim Mathern, D-Fargo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC