Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TV: Editorializing is a risky business

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 11:20 AM
Original message
TV: Editorializing is a risky business
TV: Editorializing is a risky business
By Vince Horiuchi
Tribune TV Writer
Article Last Updated: 02/11/2007 11:25:53 PM MST


A wise former editor of mine once told me that - given our human genes - the public never should expect journalists to be objective. But the public should, he said, expect journalists to be fair.

In the era of Fox News, citizen journalists on the Internet, "The Daily Show" and television pundits like Bill O'Reilly and Keith Olbermann, the line between news and commentary is blithely crossed every day.

For the most part, Utah has seemed immune from such ethical lapses and blatantly sensationalistic news presentations.
Until last week.

KTVX Channel 4 news anchor Terry Wood reported on thousands of comments the public had sent the station about the Divine Strake proposal, which would involve detonating a 7,000-megaton bomb in the Nevada desert.

Wood set out to deliver the comments to the Department of Energy. He drove to DOE headquarters in Las Vegas, where he was stopped by government guards. He gave them the stack of letters and left.

Here's the kicker: After the report, Wood was live in the studio, where he launched into a commentary (labeled as such at the bottom of the screen) about the station's stance against the bomb test, saying it would create a nuclear mist that would shroud Utah.

MORE >>>

http://www.sltrib.com/ci_5209679
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Astrad Donating Member (374 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-12-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. The problem with the 'both sides' argument
is that it ends up equalizing rational positions with insane ones. So in this case covering Salt Lake City in a 'fine nuclear mist' deserves equal time. Nuts. Really nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC