book_worm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 12:51 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Which of these presidential decisions are the worst |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 12:51 PM by book_worm
in your opinion...
p.s. I know there are other decisions many of you will find worse, but there isn't really enough room for all of them. But feel free to add your opinions.
|
cyclezealot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message |
1. since multiple chocies not allowed |
|
I did not vote. In terms of Democratic interests, i'd say equally devestating for Democrats and national interests are LBJ's escalation of VIetNam and Clinton's Nafta legacy.
|
Tesha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I read "the Nixon pardon" a bit more broadly and voted for that |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 01:03 PM by Tesha
I read "the Nixon pardon" a bit more broadly than the way it was narrowly stated in the poll and, on that basis, voted for that.
If various Republican crimes had been fully investigated and not "swept under the rug for the good of national stability", it is unlikely that GHWBush or GWBush would ever have been elected. And even if they had been elected, many of the people they eventually included in their administration would have been excluded as convicted felons.
A great portion of our current difficulties is directly traceable to the fact that we let Nixon and Reagan "get away" with stuff that should have landed people in prison for a long, long time.
And I'm very deeply concerned that at least one of our current Democratic candidates for President has stated that she would, essentially, allow GWBush's administration to get away with it as well. Are Democrats simply incapable of learning from the past???
Tesha
|
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
With that, the coup pulled victory from the jaws of defeat. Carter would have gained a 2nd term because the plotters would not have been in a position to fix the hostage crisis to Reagan's benefit, after which Reagan would not have been able to successfully run in '84. The entire dynamic of the last 30 years would have been different.
That's why, when Ford kicked and even here people were calling him the 'last good republican', I was furious at his near-reagan level of deification.
He was a repub apparatichik who had covered for republican crimes for his entire career. His efforts for the coup were essential for its success.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
14. That's why I voted for Iran/Contra |
|
It would have exposed more than Nixon, as to the very root of the Bushies involvement. A Nixon investigation probably wouldn't have, I don't think Nixon was quite the puppet that was intended, which is probably what led to his paranoia.
|
MrCoffee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
16. you nailed it exactly |
truebrit71
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Reagan....Without him, NONE of this would have occurred... |
|
...That geriatric doddering old bastard should NEVER have been in the WH...He and his British RW Whore Margaret Thatcher did more to destroy lives of the ordinary working man than any other combination of "leaders" in history...They fucked their countries over for a friggin' profit...
A pox on them and their families...
|
Toots
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
19. The Democrats controlled the Senate then |
|
Without the Democrats Scalia could never have been confirmed..
|
I_Will
(211 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Truman's decision allowed a *lot* of genies out of the bottle... |
|
and we're seeing the natural and inevitible results today and in to the future.
|
Truth2Tell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Those are some nasty genies. Truman gets my vote too.
|
damntexdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
6. LBJ -- Vietnam. It ultimately destoyed the liberal-Democrat hegemony. |
|
Had it not occurred, Dubya would not have been selectable, much less have been able to create a new Vietnam in Iraq.
|
book_worm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. others argue that it was LBJ's decision to fully embrace Civil Rights |
|
which broke the Democratic party but in the other direction--the solid south was now gone.
|
Tesha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. The poll question doesn't seem to be "worst for the Democratic Party". |
|
LBJ's decision to fully embrace Civil Rights was a *GREAT* decision and very bold. It's a shame so many Democrats ran (and stll run) away from it.
Tesha
|
book_worm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. yes and I agree it was a great decision |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 01:44 PM by book_worm
but I was responding to the previous poster saying that it was the Vietnam decision that split the democratic party from the left. But I also pointed out that the civil rights decision tore the democratic party from the right too. So the Democrats were torn apart on both ends. With the left on Vietnam and the southern conservatives on civil rights.
|
Tesha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
18. Thanks -- I agree with both points (Viet Nam and Civil Rights). (NT) |
harun
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Other: Bush II's decision to endlessly occupy Iraq no matter the cost (n/t) |
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message |
12. The Iran-Contra pardons |
|
They're the globalists. They're at the root of the Iraq war, and every other military debacle for decades.
|
Rhythm and Blue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 02:22 PM
Response to Original message |
13. So far, I'd say LBJ and Vietnam by a mile, |
|
but that's because Iraq hasn't fully shaken out yet. If the conflict significantly expands, that would switch my vote.
|
La Lioness Priyanka
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message |
15. iraq war proved we learnt nothing from history. |
|
its a recreation of viet nam and it was just sheer stupidity and arrogance for anyone to think it wouldnt be.
|
Romulox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message |
17. What about Clinton's MFN for China??? nt |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:12 PM
Response to Original message |