Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which of these presidential decisions are the worst

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:51 PM
Original message
Poll question: Which of these presidential decisions are the worst
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 12:51 PM by book_worm
in your opinion...

p.s.
I know there are other decisions many of you will find worse, but there isn't really enough room for all of them. But feel free to add your opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. since multiple chocies not allowed
I did not vote. In terms of Democratic interests, i'd say equally devestating for Democrats and national interests are LBJ's escalation of VIetNam and Clinton's Nafta legacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. I read "the Nixon pardon" a bit more broadly and voted for that
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 01:03 PM by Tesha
I read "the Nixon pardon" a bit more broadly than the way
it was narrowly stated in the poll and, on that basis,
voted for that.

If various Republican crimes had been fully investigated
and not "swept under the rug for the good of national
stability", it is unlikely that GHWBush or GWBush would
ever have been elected. And even if they had been elected,
many of the people they eventually included in their
administration would have been excluded as convicted
felons.

A great portion of our current difficulties is directly
traceable to the fact that we let Nixon and Reagan "get
away" with stuff that should have landed people in prison
for a long, long time.

And I'm very deeply concerned that at least one of our
current Democratic candidates for President has stated
that she would, essentially, allow GWBush's administration
to get away with it as well. Are Democrats simply incapable
of learning from the past???

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I have to agree.
With that, the coup pulled victory from the jaws of defeat. Carter would have gained a 2nd term because the plotters would not have been in a position to fix the hostage crisis to Reagan's benefit, after which Reagan would not have been able to successfully run in '84. The entire dynamic of the last 30 years would have been different.

That's why, when Ford kicked and even here people were calling him the 'last good republican', I was furious at his near-reagan level of deification.

He was a repub apparatichik who had covered for republican crimes for his entire career. His efforts for the coup were essential for its success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. That's why I voted for Iran/Contra
It would have exposed more than Nixon, as to the very root of the Bushies involvement. A Nixon investigation probably wouldn't have, I don't think Nixon was quite the puppet that was intended, which is probably what led to his paranoia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. you nailed it exactly
well said! :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Reagan....Without him, NONE of this would have occurred...
...That geriatric doddering old bastard should NEVER have been in the WH...He and his British RW Whore Margaret Thatcher did more to destroy lives of the ordinary working man than any other combination of "leaders" in history...They fucked their countries over for a friggin' profit...

A pox on them and their families...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. The Democrats controlled the Senate then
Without the Democrats Scalia could never have been confirmed..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I_Will Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Truman's decision allowed a *lot* of genies out of the bottle...
and we're seeing the natural and inevitible results today and in to the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Agreed
Those are some nasty genies. Truman gets my vote too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. LBJ -- Vietnam. It ultimately destoyed the liberal-Democrat hegemony.
Had it not occurred, Dubya would not have been selectable, much less have been able to create a new Vietnam in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. others argue that it was LBJ's decision to fully embrace Civil Rights
which broke the Democratic party but in the other direction--the solid south was now gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. The poll question doesn't seem to be "worst for the Democratic Party".
LBJ's decision to fully embrace Civil Rights was a *GREAT*
decision and very bold. It's a shame so many Democrats ran
(and stll run) away from it.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. yes and I agree it was a great decision
Edited on Tue Oct-09-07 01:44 PM by book_worm
but I was responding to the previous poster saying that it was the Vietnam decision that split the democratic party from the left. But I also pointed out that the civil rights decision tore the democratic party from the right too. So the Democrats were torn apart on both ends. With the left on Vietnam and the southern conservatives on civil rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Thanks -- I agree with both points (Viet Nam and Civil Rights). (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Other: Bush II's decision to endlessly occupy Iraq no matter the cost (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Iran-Contra pardons
They're the globalists. They're at the root of the Iraq war, and every other military debacle for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm and Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. So far, I'd say LBJ and Vietnam by a mile,
but that's because Iraq hasn't fully shaken out yet. If the conflict significantly expands, that would switch my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. iraq war proved we learnt nothing from history.
its a recreation of viet nam and it was just sheer stupidity and arrogance for anyone to think it wouldnt be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. What about Clinton's MFN for China??? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC