Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conyers' Judiciary Hearing on FISA!!!! On NOW on C-SPAN 2!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:23 AM
Original message
Conyers' Judiciary Hearing on FISA!!!! On NOW on C-SPAN 2!!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. heehee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I looked for a thread before I posted and didn't see one. This should be an interesting hearing!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Don't know
I guess we'll find out. Lamar Smith (R- duh) sez we're all gonna die if AT&T is forbidden to monitor our calls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Franks up now. Claiming the "majority" is working for the terrorists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Who wrote the script Franks read?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I guess Neal Boortz
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Save the Constitution! Not the arses of criminal conduct of the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oh that wacky Forbes
The majority party has been listening to those commie liberals again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. Forbes is reading the Bush script too. They are preparing for a Bush cover-up/veto!
They need the modification to forgive past crimes of the telecoms as part of the cover-up of Bush's crime, illegal spying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. thanks for the heads up.
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 09:50 AM by alyce douglas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. ALL the repugs are wetting themselves...
They are deathly askeert of them turrists that will make them pray to Allah, and give up beer and wear burkahs..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
14. Lungren
9-11 terra terra 9-11

Have you people forgotten that they want to KILL us? blah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I hate these repigs. stinking obstructionists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. The rhetoric is beyond belief. Now the Dems are the enemy instead of the Terrorists.
Is this why we have the rhetorical "terrorists" in the first place, so all political enemies can be labeled with the generality?

Someone needs to get in their face for this extreme LYING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Sounds like they need a SERIOUS slap down.
Hope it's coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
18. ugh, how much longer is this jerk going to talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
19. Conyers calls him on his BS. BRAVO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. NADLER: "Cut out the rhetoric" RIGHT ON!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
20. Lungren
What a snide little ass.

"I'm glad the chairman recognized 9-11"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
21. HOW ABOUT PROTECTING THE CONSTITUTION!!!
sorry if I yelled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
22. Lungren to Conyers: "I'm glad you recognize 911." Conyers to the asshole: "I'm glad you understand
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 09:57 AM by in_cog_ni_to
what I said." SNARK! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
24. Just say, "This Bill says Bush admitted illegal spying"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
25. Nadler is a true voice of reason. What a contrast to the insane R rhetoric!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
26. FORBES: "The People are Stupid" We can't get out of the weeds!
Terra, terra, terra .... the killers are coming...

Fear mongering is not the path to peace.
Fascism in not the path to peace.

False rhetoric in not the path to reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
27. Conyers is telling it like it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Retroactive immunity for telecommunication carrier crimes. This is the real focus
of the Rs, to aid in covering up Bush's admitted crime of illegal spying on Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
29. oh these friggin repigs get me sick, they are treasonous.
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 10:14 AM by alyce douglas
Lamar Smith time for me to mute off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
30. Why are these guys so intent on givng AT&T and Verizon retro
immunity? It seems like they are hammering that home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. Because they broke the law and the lawsuits filed will probably BANKRUPT them when
they're found GUILTY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. Because Bush captured ALL communication illegally and diverted them offshore
to circumvent American Law and the Constitution, according to my informant.

That's ALL communication in the USA sent outside the country to spy on anything they want, including Campaign 2004!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. Its about the '08 election
These changes in FISA are to help them set up the theft of the next election.

If any of the Dems in Congress hope to stay in office and have a majority, they had better get their sh*t together and fix this mess they helped create.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #40
47. They will illegally spy for 2008 no matter what happens here. Count on it!
There is no way to cure the Rs of their fascistic political crimes, like spying on the opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. But we want them convicted when we catch them
If we let them "gut" FISA, there will be no way to hold them accountable.

I also hope our Dems aren't thinking they should let this go so they can turn the tables on the GOP.

My gr-grandfather, who was head of the Dem party in his Ozark county, didn't sacrifice two sons in WWII just so our Dem leaders could trash the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. Indeed. They seem to be trying to build in immunities from prosecution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #40
55. They are trying to cover up past crimes, to salvage some of 2008. Bush spied on US.
If the People find out the truth before 2008, they won't have anything left to salvage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
31. *sigh* Lamar Smith defending AT&T and Verizon's spying on U.S. citizens.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. absolutely sickening we are becoming the enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
32. Lamer Smith. What a string of rhetorical lies. The "liberals" are the enemies of state now!
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 10:15 AM by L. Coyote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
36. Nadler is up now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
37. they hate courts and laws, geez, I hate these people.
stop jerking the American people around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
38. why so much BS Lungren up again?
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 10:22 AM by alyce douglas
time to mute again. yea, and no one from this sickening regime did anything on 9/11, it can't be any clearer to me that the government had a hand in this one, oh, well that's another subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
39. Lungren is a COWARD!
He's a snivelling, quivering coward.

He sees turrists under his bed..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
41. Lungren
"What's missing here?"

Your soul, perhaps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
42. they love to bring up FEAR and 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
43. Lungren: Breaking the law is "Responding in a Patriotic way." Finally, patriotism defined by Rs
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 10:25 AM by L. Coyote
Great. We finally have the Republicans defining patriotism as breaking the law!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
44. CONYERS: Again, calling them on their false rhetoric. PLUS, we don't know what crimes
you are asking us to forgive with retroactive immunity.

I would ask Lungren if he knows what he asks be forgiven?? Put it in their FACES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
45. GOOD! That piece of shit amendment is DOA! Sheesh. These Brown-shirts are frightening
as hell! They LOVE fascism!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #45
50. I wish we could deport their asses out of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. If lying was a crime, they could all be handcuffed by now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
46. At moments like this we see how important the 2006 election was! YEAH DEMS!!!
Edited on Wed Oct-10-07 10:34 AM by L. Coyote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #46
48. No kidding. Thank god for that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
53. Lunch
Back @ 1:30 pm EST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
54. TPM: McConnell Not So Hot on Dem FISA Bill
McConnell Not So Hot on Dem FISA Bill
By Spencer Ackerman - Oct 10, 2007
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004421.php

The ACLU has its differences, you might say, with Admiral Mike McConnell. Its website, for instance, features a page (http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/31879prs20070920.html) with the sub-headline, "McConnell Tries to Scare America in to Giving Up Fourth Amendment." But they do share one thing in common: neither much likes the Democratic RESTORE Act.

To be clear, the ACLU's opposition is intense (http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/32104prs20071009.html), and centered around the so-called "umbrella warrants," whereby the director of national intelligence and the attorney general submit an annual explanation to the FISA Court outlining why their surveillance methods target non-U.S. persons "reasonably believed to be outside the United States... for the purpose of collecting foreign intelligence information." McConnell's concerns, it's safe to say, don't center around whether umbrella authorizations violate the Fourth Amendment. Rather, he's concerned about the bill not providing retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies who cooperated with warrantless surveillance requests from 2001 to 2007. He's also more tentative than the ACLU, leaving himself room to negotiate with Congressional Democrats.

From McConnell spokesman Ross Feinstein: .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-10-07 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
56. GAVEL: Judiciary Completes Markup of FISA Revisions
Judiciary Completes Markup of FISA Revisions
Oct 10th, 2007 by Jesse Lee
http://www.speaker.gov/blog/?p=835


From the Judiciary Committee:

House Judiciary Passes RESTORE Act to Implement FISA Revisions

(Washington, DC)- Today, the House Judiciary Committee passed the “RESTORE” Act - The Responsible Electronic Surveillance that is Overseen, Reviewed, and Effective Act of 2007 (H.R. 3773). The bill seeks to update the hastily passed Protect America Act and implement safeguards to protect Americans’ civil liberties while providing the tools needed to support U.S. intelligence gathering efforts. The bill was reported favorably out of the committe, in a vote of 20-14.

Upon passage and following President Bush’s remarks about today’s action, Committee Chairman John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI) said: “Those who oppose this bill are doing so for one reason: they are trying to convince Americans that those of us who support this legislation are somehow less committed to protecting this country from attack. They will pretend this bill doesn’t meet our nation’s security needs, despite the fact that it gives the Director of National Intelligence everything he said he needed.

“Americans are willing to make sacrifices to meet true national security imperatives, but they should not give up their rights unnecessarily, just to allow one political party to score points. This bill–the RESTORE Act–successfully provides the national security tools needed to go after terrorists and protects vital rights of Americans. The bill’s opponents know this but find it more convenient to pretend otherwise.”

The final bill passed with three amendments: ...............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC