Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Toronto Star: Sun sets early on the American Century - US power elite think Bush/Dick out of control

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 08:28 AM
Original message
Toronto Star: Sun sets early on the American Century - US power elite think Bush/Dick out of control
Edited on Tue Oct-16-07 08:29 AM by JohnyCanuck
Sun sets early on the American Century


Even hard-headed realists in the U.S. power elite fear the Iraq war has crippled America's ability to lead
Oct 14, 2007 04:30 AM

Philip S. Golub

The disastrous outcome of the invasion and occupation of Iraq has caused a crisis in the power elite of the United States deeper than that resulting from defeat in Vietnam 30 years ago. Ironically, it is the very coalition of ultranationalists and neo-conservatives that coalesced in the 1970s, seeking to reverse the Vietnam syndrome, restore U.S. power and revive "the will to victory" that has caused the present crisis.

There has been no sustained popular mass protest as there was during the Vietnam War, probably because of the underclass sociology of the volunteer U.S. military and the fact that the war is being funded by foreign financial flows. However, at the elite level the war has fractured the national security establishment that has run the United States for six decades. The unprecedented public critique in 2006 by several retired senior officers over the conduct of the war, plus recurrent signs of dissent in the intelligence agencies and the state department, reflects a much wider trend in elite opinion.

Not all critics are as forthright as retired general William Odom, who tirelessly repeats that the invasion of Iraq was the "greatest strategic disaster in U.S. history"; or Col. Larry Wilkerson, Colin Powell's former chief of staff, who denounced a "blunder of historic proportions" and has recently suggested impeaching the president; or former National Security Council head Zbigniew Brzezinski, who called the war and occupation a "historic, strategic and moral calamity."

SNIP

As a social group, these realists cannot be distinguished from the object of their criticism in terms of their willingness to use force or their historically demonstrated ruthlessness in achieving state aims. Nor can the cause of their dissent be attributed to conflicting convictions over ethics, norms and values (though this may be a motivating factor for some). It lies rather in the rational realization that the war in Iraq has nearly "broken the U.S. Army," weakened the national security state, and severely, if not irreparably, undermined "America's global legitimacy" – its ability to shape world preferences and set the global agenda. The most sophisticated expressions of dissent, such as Brzezinski's, reflect the understanding that power is not reducible to the ability to coerce, and that, once lost, hegemonic legitimacy is hard to restore.

http://www.thestar.com/comment/article/266411
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good article in The Toronto Star..thank you!
And we have another thread that states that some in the US Military think bush/cheney are "out of control"..pretty soon it's going to be the general concenus. If b/c didn't have the US corporatemediawhores in bed with them they would have been gone a long time ago.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2057311#2057803

"hegemonic legitimacy is hard to restore" there ya have it.

Fuck the fascists' craving for world domination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. i'll second that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. You're welcome! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. I am very glad the writer said this....
"invasion and occupation of Iraq" instead of using the wrong term "war with Iraq"! I would only add the word "illegal" to the invasion/occupation phrase to make it totally accurate.

Thanks for posting this, it is an excellent commentary and right on point, imo.

Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. The 2006 elections, impeachment of Bush/Cheney, and withdrawal from Iraq
COULD HAVE solved this problem, or started us well on the road to solving it (--the problem described above, of U.S. legitimacy, of democratic and humanitarian values, and of adherence to international law and restraint in the use of force, but effective force in cooperation with others, when needed), but SOMETHING HAS GONE WRONG with our democratic system--to prevent this course correction--and you don't have to look far to know what it is. It's staring us in the face.

In the same month as the Iraq War Resolution--October 2002--the Anthrax Congress passed a closely related bill, but one that was kept under the radar: the "Help America Vote Act"--engineered by the biggest crooks in the Anthrax Congress, with DLC 'Democrats' in collusion (chief among them, Christopher Dodd), which appropriated a $3.9 billion electronic voting boondoggle, to fast-track electronic voting systems all over the country, run on 'TRADE SECRET,' PROPRIETARY programming code, owned and controlled by rightwing Bushite corporations, with virtually no audit-recount controls. Non-transparent, corporate-controlled vote 'counting' thus spread across the country like a cancer, during the 2002 to 2004 period, corrupting everything in its path.

The IWR guaranteed unjust war; HAVA provided the means to shove the unjust war down the throats of the American people--56% of whom opposed the war from the beginning (Feb. '03), and a whopping 70% of whom oppose it now. Tell me how we got a Congress in '06 that ESCALATED the war, and larded Bush/Cheney with another $100 billion to keep killing Iraqis until they sign over their oil rights? It's a no-brainer. The warmongers, and fascists, and global corporate predators who rule over us are rigging the frigging voting machines!

They have the NEW ability to do this, without detection. Why on earth would we presume that they are not using it? --especially when there is such overwhelming evidence that they are?

'TRADE SECRET' vote counting is not the only thing wrong with our election system, but it is the 'coup de grace'--the final blow--that locks out change. The '06 elections were rigged in many ways--for instance, war profiteer/corporate money poured into the primaries to defeat antiwar candidates or prevent them from running--but with the fascists having the ADDED power to tweak election results in favor of war and corporate looting, wherever they need to, to shape the OVERALL Congress, grass roots activists don't have a chance. We can out-fundraise and out-GOTV the fascists--we are the majority!--but we can't do ANYTHING about "trade secret" code vote switching and 'disappeared' votes. We have lost our right to a transparent vote count.

Ask Christine Jennings--the Dem candidate in FL-13, in 2006. ES&S machines 'disappeared' 18,000 votes for Congress in Democratic areas, in an election 'won' by the Bushite (naturally) by only 350 or so votes. When Jennings' lawyers took the matter to court, and asked to review ES&S's programming code, to try to figure out what happened to those 18,0000 votes, ES&S REFUSED, and argued that their right to privately profit from our election system trumps the right of the voters to know how their votes are counted! And the judge agreed! And this so-called 'Democratic' Congress has done nothing about it--nothing!

Thus, less than a handful of global corporate predator e-voting corporations--Diebold, ES&S and Sequoia--can determine the OVERALL coloration of Congress, and can also reverse presidential outcomes (as they did in 2004). They don't have to steal every seat in Congress, but, for every real representative of the people who is genuinely elected (races in which the people would likely outvote the machines), they can tweak two or three close races--D or R, it doesn't matter--into the pro-war, pro-corporate column, and produce a Congress that does the exact reverse of the will of the people, on the war and other issues.

These lofty discussions of geopolitics, and our corrupt and traitorous political establishment's angst about their broken military, and loss of cache in the world, are all well and good. We do need such discussions. They are illuminating. But any such discussion that leaves out the measures that this political establishment has taken to PREVENT democratic change, and to thwart the will of the people, are fatally incomplete. We have to START with this realization: that our political establishment fucked us over, deliberately, methodically and sneakily taking away our right to vote.

One measure of this reality is that, now that Bush/Cheney have broken our military, our infrastructure, our economy and our reputation in the world, what is being done about it? NOTHING! The political establishment is floundering around--RE-FUNDING the war, giving Bush/Cheney more spying powers, failing to impeach them for an unprecedented list of "high crimes and misdemeanors," and CONTINUING to fuck up, on a scale I would never have thought imaginable (Congress this week provoking Turkey, last week provoking Iran--and permitting Bush/Cheney to provoke Russia, by putting nukes on their border, the kind of behavior that precipitated the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962). A political establishment that has severed its connection to the will of the people will either veer far to the right ("strongman" power, fascist rule) or will flounder, as the 'Democrats' are doing--reeling from fascist excesses and unable to achieve focus and control.

The broken military, our shattered Constitution, our broken economy, and our catastrophic loss of prestige in the world are all directly attributable to stolen elections. They are NOT the result of some philosophical discussion in contending "think tanks" or corporate board rooms. They are the result of the deliberate disenfranchisement of the American people.

You can say all you want about the "Project for a New American Century"--the neo-con plan to invade Iraq and Iran and dominate the world, via a "Pearl Harbor"-type event (9/11). But the two most important factors in the implementation of that plan were Stolen Election I and Stolen Election II (2000 and 2004, and the continuation of the war with Stolen Election III in 2006). Without this PRACTICAL disempowerment of the American people, a) the Iraq War would not have happened in the first place, and b) if the Supreme Court crowning of Bush/Cheney in 2000, and the consequent invasion of Iraq, could not have been stopped, the 2004 election would have provided the remedy, had it not been stolen as well, primarily by the means installed between 2002 and 2004: 'TRADE SECRET' vote counting.

If the American people had their druthers, NONE OF THIS WOULD HAVE HAPPENED. The bastards stole one election, through corruption of the Supreme Court (and, interestingly, with ES&S--the e-voting corp, brethren to Diebold--helping to set up that "hanging chad" business in Florida--see Dan Rather's "The Trouble with Touchscreens," at www.HD.net). Then they put in place a system in which we don't even have "hanging chads" to count. We don't even KNOW--and can't know, are not permitted to SEE--how the votes are counted. And they thus provided the foundation for Stolen Election II, in 2004, and a warmonger Congress in 2006.

And the ANSWER to the problem--the problem of the destruction of the U.S. of A.--is NOT some further "think tank"/corporate board room solution (such as is likely to be foisted upon us next year, with Emperor Hillary--a "liberal"-SEEMING regime that will, in fact, help the war profiteers and global corporate predators consolidate their enormous gains under Bush)--but rather an outbreak of DEMOCRACY in this country, focused on TRANSPARENT vote counting as priority no. 1. It's not going to save the country right away, but it will save the country eventually.

If you study a wide swath of polls over the last six years--issue polls, Bush-Cheney approval polls, etc.--you will be amazed at what you see: A huge peace-minded, justice-minded, progressive American majority that is far, far different from the America we see portrayed in the war profiteering corporate news monopolies. The polls tell the story--60% to 90% American disapproval of every Bush policy, foreign and domestic, over a long period of time. Americans have shown astonishing resistance to the relentless, 24/7 war propaganda and fascist brainwashing they have been subjected to. Give these people back their right to vote, and they WILL reform this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. With regard to this comment....
"The broken military, our shattered Constitution, our broken economy, and our catastrophic loss of prestige in the world are all directly attributable to stolen elections. They are NOT the result of some philosophical discussion in contending "think tanks" or corporate board rooms. They are the result of the deliberate disenfranchisement of the American people."

I would argue the very disenfranchisement of the American people was KEY to the philosophical segment now in control of your country. They knew they could not enact their philosophical beliefs without disenfranchising American voters and they began the process well before they actually disenfranchised voters/committed election fraud in 2000.

In other words, it was not the disenfranchisement that brought this about, it was the philosophical segment that brought about the disenfranchisement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stubtoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. Question: "the war is being funded by foreign financial flows"
Where is the money coming from? I thought we were just racking up trillions in debt?

Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I can only assume it refers to the growing foreign ownership of
the US debt which, in turn, funds the illegal invasion and occupation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. "Racking up debt" occurs when you borrow money.
> Question: "the war is being funded by foreign financial flows"
>
> Where is the money coming from? I thought we were just racking
> up trillions in debt?

"Racking up debt" occurs when you borrow money. We pay for
the war with cash that is borrowed, and in that borrowing we
incur debt. Some of the borrowed cash comes from domestic
sources, some of the borrowed cash comes from foreign sources.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. k&r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC