Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Say NO on Hans von Spakovsky- He's made a career out of suppressing the vote of minorities!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:14 PM
Original message
Say NO on Hans von Spakovsky- He's made a career out of suppressing the vote of minorities!
Edited on Thu Oct-18-07 09:04 PM by Breeze54
Dear Friend,

I've learned from ColorOfChange.org that the Senate is about to vote on whether to confirm Hans von Spakovsky
--one of the worst perpetrators of voter suppression in recent history
--to the Federal Election Commission (FEC), an agency charged with enforcing election law. For far too long, the Republican party has suppressed the votes of Black people and other minorities, while the Democratic party has stood idly by and done nothing.

I've signed on with ColorOfChange.org to tell my senators that I expect them to reject von Spakovsky and condemn what he represents.

Will you join me?


http://www.colorofchange.org/vonspak/?id=1580-220969

Republicans have been fighting for months to get von Spakovsky confirmed, and, last week, most Democrats in the Senate – including some who've spoken out against him -- were ready to cave to Republican pressure and let his nomination through without a fight. Thankfully, Senators Barack Obama and Russ Feingold stepped up and took a strong stand against his nomination, blocking a procedural move that would have tied von Spakovsky's nomination into a package with three other FEC nominees, guaranteeing his appointment. Now, Obama and Feingold need our support to convince their colleagues to take a stand against voter suppression.

It's sad that they should need any convincing at all, given von Spakovsky's history.

A long history of undermining our vote

During his first term, Bush installed von Spakovsky in the Justice Department's (DOJ) voting rights section, which enforces the Voting Rights Act. There, von Spakovsky undermined the DOJ's historic mission of protecting minority voting rights, and actually transformed the department into a tool to suppress the vote.


When long-term, career employees at the Justice Department unanimously recommended rejecting Tom Delay's infamous Texas redistricting plan because it discriminated against minority voters, von Spakovsky led the charge to overrule these voting rights experts, and approved the plan. The Supreme Court later ruled that the plan violated the Voting Rights Act. Similarly, von Spakovsky overruled career attorneys to approve a discriminatory Georgia voter ID law---a law that even the Republican governor said would disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of Georgians. Again, the law was later struck down by the courts, with the ruling judge likening it to a Jim Crow-era poll tax.

Von Spakovsky's career in suppression didn't start at the DOJ. In 1997, he set the stage for Florida's 2000 voter purge when he wrote an article that called for purging felons from voter rolls. Serving on the board of the "Voter Integrity Project" (VIP) he quickly put his ideas into action -- VIP met with the company that designed Florida's purge to disenfranchise thousands of eligible voters, most of whom were Black. During the recount, von Spakovsky was in Florida as a volunteer for the Bush/Cheney campaign.

Does the Senate support voter suppression?

As shocking as these examples are, they only scratch the surface. Hans von Spakovsky has built a career solidifying Republican control by disenfranchising untold thousands and subverting our most fundamental democratic right.

Republicans wants von Spakovsky on the FEC so much that they threatened to block all FEC nominees unless the Democrats let von Spakovsky through. But last week, instead of fighting, the Democratic leadership gave the Republicans what they wanted -- a vote on all four FEC nominees as a package, which would have guaranteed Von Spakovsky's appointment. By blocking that vote Senators Obama and Feingold went against the leadership and thwarted its compromise with Republicans. That gave us the fighting chance we need to defeat his nomination.

A vote for von Spakovsky is a vote for voter suppression. Anything less than the strongest condemnation of his nomination sends the message that the Senate will turn a blind eye to Republican attacks on our voting rights. Let's demand that our senators send the opposite message -- that they will fight tooth and nail to defend the right to vote, and that their rejection of von Spakovsky's nomination is only the beginning of a much needed reckoning for the assault on voting rights over the last six and a half years.

Will you join me?

http://www.colorofchange.org/vonspak/?id=1580-220969

Thanks.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does the Senate support voter suppression?
Edited on Thu Oct-18-07 08:23 PM by Breeze54
Does the Senate support voter suppression?

As shocking as these examples are, they only scratch the surface. Hans von Spakovsky has built a career solidifying Republican control by disenfranchising untold thousands and subverting our most fundamental democratic right.

Bush gave von Spakovsky a recess appointment to the FEC in 2005 (which doesn't require Senate confirmation). Now he has nominated him for a six-year term. It's been clear since von Spakovsky's arrival at the FEC that he is playing the same role he did at the DOJ -- scoffing at the spirit of campaign finance laws, thumbing his nose at the law as he seeks to help create routes of circumvention."12


Republicans want von Spakovsky on the FEC so much that they threatened to block all FEC nominees unless the Democrats let von Spakovsky through.13 But last week, instead of fighting back, the Democratic leadership agreed to give the Republicans what they wanted -- a vote on all four FEC nominees as a package, which would have guaranteed von Spakovsky's appointment. By blocking that vote, Senators Obama and Feingold went against the leadership and thwarted its compromise with Republicans.14 That gave us the fighting chance we need to defeat his nomination.

It's hard to know exactly why Senate Democrats have come so close to letting von Spakovsky through. Some say it's because Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is afraid that if he blocks von Spakovsky, Republicans will retaliate by blocking another FEC nominee who's a friend of Reid's.15 Some senators may just not care enough about protecting voting rights to make a real effort. Whatever the reason, it's part of a pattern that has existed for far too long -- Republicans trashing our right to vote and Democrats looking the other way.

A vote for von Spakovsky is a vote for voter suppression.
Anything less than the strongest condemnation of his nomination sends the message that the Senate will turn a blind eye to Republican attacks on our voting rights. Let's demand that our senators send the opposite message -- that they will fight tooth and nail to defend the right to vote, and that their rejection of von Spakovsky's nomination is only the beginning of a much needed reckoning for his assault on voting rights over the last six and a half years.

http://www.colorofchange.org/vonspak/?id=1580-220969

Thank You and Peace,

-- James, Van, Gabriel, Clarissa, Mervyn, and the rest of the ColorOfChange.org team
October 18th, 2007


References:

1. "Obama, Others Nix Deal on Voter Fraud Guru," TPMMuckraker, October 4, 2007
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004381.php

2. "Obama, Feingold: We Oppose von Spakovsky Nomination," October 4, 2007
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004389.php

3. "So exactly where were you, Hans von Spakovsky, on the nights in question?," Campaign Legal Center Blog, Feb. 20, 2007
http://www.clcblog.org/blog_item-109.html

4. Ibid

5. "Efforts to stop ‘voter fraud' may have curbed legitimate voting," McClatchy Newspapers, May 20, 2007
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/staff/greg_gordon/story/16347.html

6. "Justice official accused of blocking suits into alleged violations of minorities' voting rights," McClatchy Newspapers, Jun. 18, 2007
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/reports/usattorneys/story/17102.html

7. "Poll position: Is the Justice Department poised to stop voter fraud-or to keep voters from voting?" New Yorker, September 20, 2004
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2004/09/20/040920fa_fact

8. Video: "American Blackout: Cynthia McKinney Confronts Choicepoint"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPOmOTyDm1w

9. "The EAC's Buried Report on 'Voter Fraud'," Brad Blog, Oct. 13, 2006
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=3611

10. See reference 5

11. "Panel Said to Alter Finding on Voter Fraud," New York Times, April 11, 2007
http://www.ceimn.org/news/panel_said_alter_finding_voter_fraud

12. See reference 3

13. "Senate panel advances controversial FEC appointee," The Hill, September 27, 2007
http://tinyurl.com/2stwz4

14. See references 1 and 2.

15. "Back-Scratching Across the Aisle," New York Times, October 3, 2007
http://tinyurl.com/2xgs3x

Additional sources:

"Hans Across America," Digby's Hullabaloo, April 9, 2007
http://tinyurl.com/368jbt

"Keep Yer Vote Thievin' Hans Off the Federal Election Commission: Action Alert!" DailyKos, May 29, 2007
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/5/29/11751/0476
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Done. But it is unbelievable that we have to beg Democratic Senators to oppose
this nomination. It is appalling. It is unconscionable. Think of the energy we have to spend begging our representatives to do the very things we elected them to do. Think of what we could do if we did not have to fight the same battles over and over - and with our allies? Some allies. I mean, even I can hardly believe this. Are the Democrats going to once again sell out minority voters, one of their most reliable constituencies? Bad enough that they've made next to no effort since the Great Society to stop the slide of our inner city minority neighborhoods into Third World poverty and violence. Now we have to beg them to protect minority voters' rights?

And a thank you to Senators Feingold and Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I hear you! It's appalling and that's what I wrote in my letter.
Edited on Thu Oct-18-07 08:53 PM by Breeze54
I don't understand WHY Reid and the others don't see what's happening

and just seem to 'float down the Sunny River" and are soooo out of touch!! :argh:

:wtf: are they thinking?? :banghead:

I'm really glad Senators Feingold and Obama are on top of this!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

They'd make a great team in the White house!!!

Thanks for signing and kicking this, now for a recommend or two! ;)

Please spread the word, OK? Thanks!! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kicking hard for JUSTICE!!!!
:kick:

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. Signed, kicked and recommended.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thank You, Kool Kitty!

:hi:

Please, also spread the word on this to all your friends and family, OK?

Thanks! :D



:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I certainly will.
I remember watching him testify in committee a while ago, I think this past summer, and he is appalling. Where do they keep coming up with these people-this guy who wants to suppress voting, the anti-birth control woman Bush appointed to be Acting Deputy Secretary for Population, an Attorney General appointee that is torture-impaired, Christ Almighty, it never ends. The next fourteen months are going to be a real trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I fear you're right...the last 14 months. Almost sounds like
"The Green Mile", doesn't it? Or "Dead Man Walking". :(

People need to wake up NOW, more than ever!! Right now!!

Before the disenfranchised voters are again disenfranchised and before
they change and appoint people for six years past * occupancy! :grr:

Thanks! :hug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. Please click the link and watch the video!! ~ CHILLING!!!!

Don't let what happened in Election 2000 happen again!!

Go watch the video at this link!!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x63552

It's short but eye opening and infuriating! :grr:

If you have dial up?

Then; just click that = pause button and let the video load

( @ 20 minutes) and then watch it! ;)

You can still do other stuff on your computer while the video loads.

Sign the letter and then copy and send it to all your friends and family asap!!

Thanks!!

We're Taking Our Country Back!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truckin Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. Done. It's sad that he would even be considered for this position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. Little interest here in minority voting rights, I take it? The Dems most reliable constituency, I
believe? And why do we have to beg the Democrats not to confirm this racist tool anyway? Is the OP incorrect? Is this a non-issue? Did I miss the news that he's already been confirmed? Or the nomination withdrawn? I can't keep up, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. This IS an issue, a big one!
Edited on Sat Oct-20-07 10:23 AM by Breeze54
We have to spread the word on this all over the net, not just here at DU.

Thanks for signing the letter, if you did. ;)

"Did I miss the news that he's already been confirmed? Or the nomination withdrawn?"

My OP states that Obama and Feingold have blocked a vote on him, for now, but we're

trying to get him removed once and for all! Period!

-------------------------------

UPDATE:



Obama calls on Bush to ax voting rights chief

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obama-calls-on-bush-to-ax-voting-rights-chief-2007-10-19.html

By Jonathan E. Kaplan
October 19, 2007

Presidential candidate and Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) on Friday called
on the Bush administration to sack a senior Justice Department official
who has made controversial remarks about minorities.

snip-->

Obama and Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) placed a Senate hold on Hans von Spakovsky,
whom Bush nominated to the Federal Election Committee (FEC). He had served as
counsel to the assistant attorney general for civil rights and has been accused
of politicizing the Justice Department.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell
(R-Ky.) reportedly agreed earlier this month to send four nominees to the FEC
by voice vote if there were no objections. When Obama, Feingold and others
objected, the nominations stalled.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. K&R&signed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VenusRising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
13. Done.
Jeebus. I can't believe we are having to fight for the right to have our vote counted in the 21st century. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC