Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Business Week: Low cost solar may be here

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 06:40 AM
Original message
Business Week: Low cost solar may be here


http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_42/b4054053.htm?chan=technology_technology+index+page_top+stories


In late September, Ausra, Pacific Gas & Electric (PCG ), and Florida Power & Light (FPL ) announced commitments for 1,000 megawatts of solar power--as much as a nuclear plant. The details are still in negotiation. But the current plan is to start with a 10-MW demonstration plant in Florida, then expand to 300 MW. With PG&E, Ausra expects to kick off with a 175-MW plant. These facilities could be ready to flip the switch as early as 2010. The main lure: Ausra believes it has solved the biggest problem solar power has faced previously--its high cost. "What I find attractive about Ausra is that it's taking approaches used in the past and driving the price down, making it cheap," says PG&E CEO Peter A. Darbee. "It's lower risk and environmentally friendly. I'm very enthusiastic about the technology."

--

There's a sense in the financial community that booms in wind and ethanol are over. The next thing? It looks like solar. "There has been a dramatic increase in deal volume on solar projects," says Keith Martin, partner at Chadbourne & Parke in Washington. "It is our fastest growing area of financing here."

This trend helps Ausra. In mid-September, the company hired a veteran utility executive from Calpine Corp., Robert E. Fishman, to be CEO, freeing O'Donnell to be the full-time evangelist. Ausra is also busy working on deals in Arizona, Colorado, and Nevada. "They clearly believe there are technology solutions to our energy challenges, and they are developing them while most in Washington are sitting around arguing," says Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.), chairman of the Energy & Natural Resources Committee, who has met with O'Donnell and Khosla.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting...
.. in addition to the mirror technology outlined here, there are promising new developments in solar panel technology also.

Necessity is indeed the mother of invention :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. this is just remarkable
brilliant! Check out the interactive! Very cool. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Solar is huge in Germany, there is no excuse why
the US can't make more use of it. Tax credits, whatever it takes to get individuals to make their houses environmentally friendly, get us off OIL!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. I wonder how cheap solar would be if
we had had a national solar power initiative starting from the Carter years, when it was originally proposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. The boom in wind is over? When did I miss that?
I've yet to see a "boom". Sure, things are ramping up, and continue to ramp up. But boom, no. In fact wind's full potential has yet to really be tapped.

We're going to need both wind and solar, I'm glad to hear this news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. actually, wind power poised to provide base load energy too
http://watthead.blogspot.com/2007/07/texas-wind-power-mega-project-announced.html


Shell Wind Energy and TXU subsidiary Luminant Energy planning a 3,000 MW wind megaproject in Texas panhandle and are considering compressed air energy storage to firm and shape project's output



TXU Corp.'s generating subsidiary and Shell WindEnergy plan a huge Panhandle wind farm that could include the use of compressed air to generate electricity when there's not enough wind to spin the big turbines.

The 3,000-megawatt facility is slated for windy Briscoe County, southeast of Amarillo, Luminant Energy and Shell said Friday. That would rank as the world's largest single installation and roughly matches the wind farm recently announced by Texas investor Boone Pickens, whose Mesa Power is seeking to install 2,000 to 4,000 megawatts of wind power in four Panhandle counties.

The companies did not say when they expect to begin the project or what it might cost. They said they also plan to work together on other renewable-energy projects in the state.

"We are very excited about this project, using compressed air to provide power when we need it, without pollution," said Tom "Smitty" Smith, director of Public Citizen's Austin office, which has criticized TXU's plans to build more coal-fired power plants. He said that if all health and environmental costs are included, "this is the lowest-cost way to generate electricity," a view shared by Shell in recent testimony before the Public Utility Commission.


----------


http://www.isepa.com/about_isep.asp

In a CAES at the ISEP facility, air will be compressed using low-cost, off-peak electricity, and wind that is not being sold on the grid at that time. The air is stored in a deep underground geological formation for later use in making electricity. When energy is needed, the stored air will be released, heated and used to drive generating turbines. The electricity it produces can be used as needed, especially during high-demand peak hours. This process uses less fuel than a conventional combustion-turbine facility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC