Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why don't we try to demand that Democratic candidates not take money from MIIC -- ???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 02:04 PM
Original message
Why don't we try to demand that Democratic candidates not take money from MIIC -- ???
Edited on Fri Oct-19-07 02:05 PM by defendandprotect
Can we try to make that Democratic Party policy . . . ??????


Clinton bucks the trend and rakes in cash from the US weapons industry
By Leonard Doyle in Washington
Published: 19 October 2007
The US arms industry is backing Hillary Clinton for President and has all but abandoned its traditional allies in the Republican party. Mrs Clinton has also emerged as Wall Street's favourite. Investment bankers have opened their wallets in unprecedented numbers for the New York senator over the past three months and, in the process, dumped their earlier favourite, Barack Obama.

Mrs Clinton's wooing of the defence industry is all the more remarkable given the frosty relations between Bill Clinton and the military during his presidency. An analysis of campaign contributions shows senior defence industry employees are pouring money into her war chest in the belief that their generosity will be repaid many times over with future defence contracts.

Employees of the top five US arms manufacturers – Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop-Grumman, General Dynamics and Raytheon – gave Democratic presidential candidates $103,900, with only $86,800 going to the Republicans. "The contributions clearly suggest the arms industry has reached the conclusion that Democratic prospects for 2008 are very good indeed," said Thomas Edsall, an academic at Columbia University in New York.

Republican administrations are by tradition much stronger supporters of US armaments programmes and Pentagon spending plans than Democratic governments. Relations between the arms industry and Bill Clinton soured when he slimmed down the military after the end of the Cold War. His wife, however, has been careful not to make the same mistake.

After her election to the Senate, she became the first New York senator on the armed services committee, where she revealed her hawkish tendencies by supporting the invasion of Iraq. Although she now favours a withdrawal of US troops, her position on Iran is among the most warlike of all the candidates – Democrat or Republican.





http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article3075691.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Trying is lying. If we are going to do anything we have to do it not TRY to do it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. So . . . are you agreeing to DEMANDING this be DU/Democratic Party policy -- ???
Edited on Fri Oct-19-07 02:59 PM by defendandprotect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I am all for demanding that we have Public Financing of all Federal Elections; That we have open
transparent verifiable elections;
that we have Single payer health CARE for everyone;
that it be official government policy the everyone has a job that pays a living wage;
that every child has a quality free public education as long as they are interested and progressing;
that US trade agreements and policies demand equitable treatment for workers and the environment;
and that the current crop of misfits and criminal psychopaths be impeached, then tried convicted and imprisoned for a life term for each life they have been responsible for ruining (That should be 1,000,000 consecutive life terms at a minimum).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'd like the whole Easter Basket, as well -- however, right now . . .
are you willing to DEMAND that Democratic candidates not take money from the MIIC -- ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Do you want to demand the they give it back? They already took it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes -- that wouldn't be setting a precedent -- they've returned tainted money before -- !!!
Edited on Fri Oct-19-07 11:21 PM by defendandprotect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Ok you start the petition. I will sign it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think we need a consensus of more than two people -- DUers not concerned re MIIC????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-19-07 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gee I guess they didn't give any to Obama and you all are pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC