First, do we all agree on the things we want done?
With the last Clinton, I got several things which I really did not want done.
1) NAFTA
2) welfare "reform"
3) loss of Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress
4) continual trumpeting of rightwing talking points ("the era of Big Government is over" being the one I remember most clearly.)
Second, I am always uncomfortable with this "great people" notion. That there are Atlases who hold up the world and things cannot get done without them. They are the only ones who can do what they do and what needs to be done. Balderdash. That's like saying only certain Pharoah's have the drive and ambition to build the Pyramids. That's like making Brett Favre singlehandedly responsible for making the Packers 5-1. Favre is probably key, but he is not the only one, or even "the best" (if there is such a thing).
Last time, Republicans were so unwilling to work with Clinton that they impeached him and shut the Government down. I fail to see how she can get anything done unless she has a huge mandate for her platform, and I am not real clear on what her platform is.
But I was also surprised to see a poll that said more people would definitely vote against Edwards.
http://www.liberaloasis.com/2007/10/the_most_polarizing_prez_candi.php