|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 02:39 PM Original message |
Poll question: Very simple DU poll: Richard B. Cheney has committed crimes, including treason Y/N? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. IMPEACH CHENEY FIRST-IMPEACH CHENEY NOW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. Of course he has.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 02:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Respectfully, no he hasn't neutralized all evidence and witnesses Virginia Dare. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'll take 'yes' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
4. hell yeah he has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yes, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
movonne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. I always wonder who here on du would vote no...maybe some trolls... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Anyone trolling here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
7. Crimes, yes, but probably not treason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. Would "material aid" include nuclear armament? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. If you can find evidence proving that Richard Cheney personally provided |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:19 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. Seriously endangering the national security interests by not only allowing,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:22 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Are you referring to India? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #31 |
84. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. Ah, you're referring to Six Degrees of Richard Cheney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:53 PM Response to Reply #85 |
92. Hardly. Ah, I see. That's how you characterize the information. Well, no use in continuing,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #92 |
98. Yes, once I suggest that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:23 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. No it doesn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timtom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:21 PM Response to Reply #34 |
113. If I may interject... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #113 |
115. It certainly would. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timtom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 06:29 PM Response to Reply #115 |
134. There I go again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 10:44 PM Response to Reply #113 |
143. The U.S. Constitution defines treason narrowly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timtom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 01:40 AM Response to Reply #143 |
146. The previous poster and I already covered this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #18 |
30. Giving nuclear weapons to an enemy state, sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
8. Treason is an exaggeration. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 02:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. no it is not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:07 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:15 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. make war against, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:15 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. or seriously injure the what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:16 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. It was probably something in square brackets, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:17 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Well there you go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:19 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. He has, but you're missing the first component of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:24 PM Response to Reply #22 |
35. link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:43 PM Response to Reply #35 |
59. Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:47 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Richard Cheney has provided material aid to hostile nations, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:01 PM Response to Reply #61 |
68. Yes he has READ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:21 PM Response to Reply #68 |
75. Playing "Six Degrees of Seperation" with a high-ranking American politician |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 07:50 PM Response to Reply #75 |
137. LISTEN TO THIS PLAME SAYS IT'S TREASON |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 08:33 PM Response to Reply #137 |
140. You're right, we should ignore 200 years of legal precedent and defer to her. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 08:08 AM Response to Reply #140 |
147. I don't know who the hell you are but you are no Valerie Plame and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:16 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. The JUST US Department is corrupted by those that have prevented prosecution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:17 PM Response to Reply #23 |
73. Obstruction of justice is indeed criminal, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tommy_Carcetti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
12. Is the Pope Catholic? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
32. Was christ a Jew?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 10:15 PM Response to Reply #32 |
142. Only on his mother's side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trouser Trout (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
13. Where's the Category For "He's Pure Evil" ? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
14. He has committed many crimes. I do not believe a charge of treason would stick in court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:38 PM Response to Reply #14 |
55. More likely espionage, not treason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
15. If treason, as defined in the dictionary, means betrayal of a trust or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. However, that is not how treason is legally defined. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:19 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. Please provide the legal definition, and we could probably yank that apart, too. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:25 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. Sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #37 |
46. So levying an illegal war Americans would have to fight and die for isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. No, it isn't. It may be criminal for other reasons, but it is not treasonous unless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:32 PM Response to Reply #37 |
50. By your own words: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. You probably started typing before I added this note. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #52 |
87. "treason is a crime of intent as well," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:47 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. That would be the crime of espionage, not treason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 08:36 AM Response to Reply #88 |
152. what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:32 PM Response to Reply #15 |
51. "They are, in my view, the most insidious of traitors." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #51 |
57. For some reason the first link is redirecting, here is the actual link: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
16. Very simply, yes, including treason. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robertpaulsen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
25. YES, IN CAPS, YES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Traveler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
33. Lemme see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
36. Quite obviously not. "Treason" has a specific meaning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBaldyMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:28 PM Response to Reply #36 |
78. how do you class the outing of Valerie Plame? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
38. I was trying to think who would have voted "No" in this poll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. You could start with reading the thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 08:10 AM Response to Reply #40 |
149. IT SEEMS WE JUST MIGHT FIGURE OUT A LOT OF THINGS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #38 |
67. I voted "No" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
39. The fact that this poll is not 100% yes is scary shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. People who care what words mean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. If what Cheney has done isn't treason, then the word simply has no meaning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:34 PM Response to Reply #47 |
53. Sure it does. A very specific legal meaning. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #47 |
54. Is beating a dog treason? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:57 PM Response to Reply #54 |
65. Again I ask: Where to begin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:15 PM Response to Reply #65 |
69. Violations of the Constitution are not by themselves treason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #69 |
83. What about intentionally scheming to destroy its substance? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #83 |
86. That would be an extremely vague charge, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #86 |
96. I disagree. Conspiracy to disassemble the substance of the USC is pretty specific. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:05 PM Response to Reply #96 |
102. Huh. I don't recall that one being in the United States Code. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:12 PM Response to Reply #102 |
106. I wasn't citing law. I was referring to the U.S. Constitution. Deconstruction requires no,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:18 PM Response to Reply #106 |
110. Well, I should like a reasonable discussion, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #110 |
114. Really. You've dismissed whistle-blower testimony (e.g. evidence). No where to go from there. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:29 PM Response to Reply #114 |
116. Yes, I have dismissed the claim that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:53 PM Response to Reply #69 |
93. You assert both of those as if they are axioms. Quite the contrary . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #93 |
99. Very good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #93 |
100. I'm sorry, but federal courts stopped accepting legal briefs written on tinfoil. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:04 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. Oh, my. Out with the tinfoil assertion. "Smart". eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:06 PM Response to Reply #101 |
103. Claims of an overarching conspiracy with no factual references would indeed be tinfoil. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:14 PM Response to Reply #103 |
108. Why bother citing facts/evidence when they'll be dismissed as something else? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:20 PM Response to Reply #108 |
111. Well, one could try citing actual facts or actual evidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:33 PM Response to Reply #111 |
118. If I thought it would make a difference, I'd take the time to give that to you. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 09:08 AM Response to Reply #100 |
153. Federal courts consider allegations far, far, far more "tinfoil" than this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. People who actually know the definition of treason. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #39 |
74. Not freeper lurkers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:23 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. It's interesting how many people have asked who's posting the 'no' votes, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. I think it's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
41. War crimes refresher |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #41 |
48. Great stuff-thanks! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
42. Definition of treason in the USA, just so we are clear... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:40 PM Response to Reply #42 |
56. Richard B. Cheney is a domestic enemy of the US-I'm with the citizens that state that fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Richard Cheney has declared a desire to see America overthrown? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:47 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. Our US Constitution has been "overthrown" piecemeal-that is treason since it is US eom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:48 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. Violations of the Constitution are not treasonous. They are criminal. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Papering it over is treason regardless of the form (PD, EO, etc) by unelected Executive n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:15 PM Response to Reply #64 |
70. No, it is obstruction of justice, which is certainly criminal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:16 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. See post 23 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #63 |
81. Signing on to PNAC should be enough. Their intent is to overthrow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:48 PM Response to Reply #81 |
89. You're half right on that one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:56 PM Response to Reply #89 |
94. Rigged elections & "permanent republican majority" = overthrowing our form of government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:07 PM Response to Reply #94 |
104. Election fraud is not the same as treason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:27 PM Response to Reply #56 |
77. No, treason is waging war on the USA, adhering to its enemies ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. It seems too many wish to define "treasonous" as an adjective meaning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBaldyMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #77 |
82. outing Plame gave aid and comfort to America's enemies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:50 PM Response to Reply #82 |
91. Yeah, in the same way the Dixie Chicks did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:57 PM Response to Reply #91 |
95. Actually, I think he/she may be correct there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:12 PM Response to Reply #95 |
107. The crime of treason is one of foreign collaboration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:31 PM Response to Reply #107 |
117. Please, cite law backing up the assertion ALL acts of treason require foreign collaboration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:44 PM Response to Reply #117 |
119. Cramer v. United States (1945) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 06:04 PM Response to Reply #119 |
123. Haupt v US, 330 U.S. 631 (1947). nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 06:06 PM Response to Reply #123 |
124. That's amusing (edited to add more excerpts) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 06:28 PM Response to Reply #124 |
133. ...so you're done, then? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBaldyMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:10 PM Response to Reply #91 |
105. what part of destroying up the anti-WMD network isn't harming the US? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:21 PM Response to Reply #105 |
112. And which government was Richard Cheney collaborating with when he did this? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBaldyMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:49 PM Response to Reply #112 |
120. What legal basis do you have for your assertion for your sine qua non? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:51 PM Response to Reply #120 |
121. It's been part of the United States legal tradition since its inception. See: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 06:02 PM Response to Reply #121 |
122. And if you do not think Cramer case would be considered precedent, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #122 |
125. Apparently, you didn't read Haupt, a 1947 case. Foreign collaboration is NOT necessary. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 06:10 PM Response to Reply #125 |
126. That is not remotely what Haupt found. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBaldyMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 06:15 PM Response to Reply #121 |
127. I still assert that treason has been committed, let me expand my argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 06:18 PM Response to Reply #127 |
130. So, again, who is the enemy that is being adhered to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBaldyMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 06:22 PM Response to Reply #130 |
131. You didn't read my post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 06:24 PM Response to Reply #131 |
132. I did. It was incorrect. Read mine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBaldyMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 06:52 PM Response to Reply #132 |
135. You keep clinging to the notion that you MUST 'adhere to a foreign power'. not so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 07:02 PM Response to Reply #135 |
136. Well, let's see what case law says about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBaldyMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 07:59 PM Response to Reply #136 |
138. Cheney, by your reasoning, did adhere to an ill-disposed foreign agency. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhythm and Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 08:17 PM Response to Reply #138 |
139. And that opinion is in contrast to the explicit opinion of the Court. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBaldyMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 09:04 PM Response to Reply #139 |
141. with respect, I fail to see how this disagrees with the explicit opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 10:46 PM Response to Reply #82 |
144. Maybe. I have always taken the view that a nation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
45. More than enough evidence to have a trial! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBaldyMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
62. I only voted 'yes' because there is no 'FUCK YEAH!' option. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RebelSansCause (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
66. IMPEACH THE FUCKER NOW!!!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stirlingsliver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
72. I.M.P.E.A.C.H. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
and-justice-for-all (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
90. CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
97. Every Iraqi child that is needlessly killed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
109. Dick Cheney and George Bush are not loyal Americans. Their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
128. I Would Say That Fitzgerald |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
129. Where was "HELL, YES!" ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-22-07 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
145. Treason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
148. Crimes and abuses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 08:15 AM Response to Original message |
150. Very simple poll, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-23-07 08:15 AM Response to Original message |
151. You needed a poll for this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-24-07 12:00 AM Response to Reply #151 |
154. The name Marrah means bitter, right? Did you vote yes? eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 03:45 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC