Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

With Democrats like these, who needs Republicans?...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 05:25 PM
Original message
With Democrats like these, who needs Republicans?...
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Liberal_Democrat_introduces_tax_plan_Cut_1025.html

Democrats' tax plan: Cut corporate tax by 5 percent, hike taxes 4 percent on families earning $200,000 or more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wish: we could just call them "representatives" and get rid of the "D" and "R".
Maybe, THEN, we would ALL HAVE A CHANCE at sorting out the bad apples from the good ones.

'jus sayin. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. hoo boy
that's just awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Republicans hate the bill, so I guess the headline is wrong.
Republicans quickly voiced strong opposition to the long-term plan. "This is the largest individual income tax increase in history," Rep. Jim McCrery of Louisiana, Rangel's low-key GOP counterpart on the committee, wrote fellow Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. You -- and RAW Story's own headline writer -- need to read the article
Edited on Thu Oct-25-07 05:37 PM by brentspeak
"That would be offset by applying a replacement tax of 4 percent of married couple income above a certain level, not to be less than $200,000. The tax would be 4.6 percent on income in excess of $500,000, or $250,000 in the case of a single taxpayer. High-income individuals would see a limitation on itemized deductions and a phase-out of deductions for personal exemptions, raising $29 billion over 10 years."

You also, amazingly enough, forgot to mention the key point of the proposal: repeal of the alternative minimum tax:

"In laying out the plan that would effectively rewrite many of the tax policies put in place under Republican control of Congress, Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) said the changes would bring a net tax reduction to almost all families with incomes under $500,000 and that some 91 million families would receive tax relief."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, repealing the AMT is a necessity.
And they have to shuffle the tax base around to do it. I don't get the OP's problem with this tax proposal. It certainly seems much fairer than the tax break give away to the ultra rich and corporations we have now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. My bad. I reacted to the headline....
after actually reading the article it DOES seem to be a move in the right direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC