Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If we didn't have the Internet, how much further down the Fascism hole would we be?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 10:08 AM
Original message
If we didn't have the Internet, how much further down the Fascism hole would we be?
We would lose a lot of the ability to investigate and research on our own, to fact check, send quick emails and communications around the globe. It allows us to discuss ideas and organize groups. I was just thinking that this Administration stole the playbook on propaganda suppresion of ideas from Goebel's et al. That system was designed before the internet existed. Is it the only thing now holding us back now from full fledged Fascism? Would Bush's poll numbers be big? Would we all believe the lies told to us by the Administration and the Media. Would today's 30%ers be the norm? Perception is reality. If you can manufacture the truth, you can manufacture consent for anything. Right now we are discussing whether or not torture is legal. Would we even know about it if the internet was not around? Scary to think about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. A long, LONG way down....
..if all we had to go by was the MSM then we'd be completely screwed..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. No kidding....best thing about it, sad to say...
is access to foreign media to double check the doublespeak.


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. It would be over
This would be a Chinese style government by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. yep, spot on, that
it'd be done, rather than very nearly done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. well, I for one would still be an uninformed sheep
probably huddling in the corner with my nose in a book while the world falls apart around me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah me too. You can really learn a lot at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. we would be a big trouble but we have a media now
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 10:15 AM by alyce douglas
who does not give the facts and the truth to its citizens. Thank goodness, we have the Internet at our disposal right now, but should we put measures in place for ourselves if they ever decide to limit usage or viewing of Internet for ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. There are MANY times I honestly wonder what the heck we did
before we had the net! I use it all the time for everything, and when my connection goes down I really get irate! (Just ask the Charter CS reps!)

If I hear some politician say something that just doesn't sound quite right, I check with google!

If I need a phone # the first place I go is SuperPages. (I haven't opened a phone book in YEARS!)

If I need directions, I go to map quest.

And if I have a question I can't find the answer to, I come to DU! You folks have NEVER let me down either!!!!

The other thing I would be totally LOST without is streaming radio. I live in North Ga. and the only thing worth listening to on the radio here is Clark Howard, the consumer advocate. If it wasn't for Streaming radio, I wouldn't know Mike Malloy, Stacy Taylor, Ed Schultz, Randy Rhodes, Rachel Maddow, etc.

YES, we'd be in much deeper sh*t without the net!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. Headsup: Save the Internet Movement
The Threat is Real How does this threat to Internet freedom affect you?

Small businesses—The little guy will be left in the "slow lane" with inferior Internet service, unable to compete.

Innovators with the next big idea—Startups and entrepreneurs will be muscled out of the marketplace by big corporations that pay Internet providers for the top spots on the Web.

Bloggers—Costs will skyrocket to post and share video and audio clips—silencing citizen journalists and putting more power in the hands of a few corporate-owned media outlets.

Google users—Another search engine could pay dominant Internet providers like AT&T to guarantee another search engine opens faster than Google on your computer.

Ipod listeners—A company like Comcast could slow access to iTunes, steering you to a higher-priced music service it owns.

Online shoppers—Companies could pay Internet providers to guarantee their online sales process faster than competitors with lower prices—distorting your choices as a consumer.

Telecommuters—When Internet companies like AT&T favor their own services, you won't be able to choose more affordable providers for online video, teleconferencing, Internet phone calls, and software that connects your home computer to your office.

Parents and retirees—Your choices as a consumer could be controlled by your Internet provider, steering you to their preferred services for online banking, health care information, sending photos, planning vacations, etc.

Political groups—Political organizing could be slowed by a handful of dominant Internet providers who ask advocacy groups to pay "protection money" for their Web sites and online features to work correctly.

Nonprofits—A charity's website could open at snail-like speeds, and online contributions could grind to a halt if nonprofits don't pay Internet providers for access to "the fast lane."
What They've Got Planned

The threat to an open internet isn't just speculation -- we've seen what happens when the Internet's gatekeepers get too much control. These companies, even, have said as much about their plans to discriminate online. According to the Washington Post:

William L. Smith, chief technology officer for Atlanta-based BellSouth Corp., told reporters and analysts that an Internet service provider such as his firm should be able, for example, to charge Yahoo Inc. for the opportunity to have its search site load faster than that of Google Inc.

He's not alone. Ed Whitacre of AT&T told BusinessWeek in late 2005:

Now what they would like to do is use my pipes free, but I ain't going to let them do that because we have spent this capital and we have to have a return on it. So there's going to have to be some mechanism for these people who use these pipes to pay for the portion they're using. Why should they be allowed to use my pipes?



We should not assume that it can not be taken away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Is there any pending legislation to protect free usage? What are people doing to fend off
corporate involvement? You know more about it than I do. Any info the subject would be appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. Information in excerpt from an article
The End of the Internet?

Net Neutrality

To ward off the prospect of virtual toll booths on the information highway, some new media companies and public-interest groups are calling for new federal policies requiring "network neutrality" on the Internet. Common Cause, Amazon, Google, Free Press, Media Access Project and Consumers Union, among others, have proposed that broadband providers would be prohibited from discriminating against all forms of digital content. For example, phone or cable companies would not be allowed to slow down competing or undesirable content.



Just my personal opinion, CLEC, competitive local exchange carrier, a telephone company that competes with an incumbent local exchange carrier (ILEC) such as a Regional Bell Operating Company (RBOC), GTE, ALLNET, etc. offers better assurances.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. Scarier is thinking the internet will save us
Yeah, we can send quick e-mails and communicate the world over. At the same time, that helps outsourcing.

We know about torture. At the same time, we're not stopping it.

We can organize protests against the war. At the same time, it's still going on, and really no signs that this war, or the next one, or the one after that, will stop.

The internet exists in the civilian world for commerce. It doesn't exist to fundamentally change anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. The Internet alone will not save us,
anymore than fire alone saved early human kind, but it is an invaluable tool. We've entered the information age and information is power, money and influence, that's one reason running advertisements for election on television are so expensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
12. Why do you think companies like Comcast and the rest
are trying to censure our emails and websites. And the government is trying to take it over. THEY WANT TO SHUT US UP.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
13. I believe that's why Bush just attacked it
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 10:56 AM by Uncle Joe
with his speech at the Heritage Foundation. He attacked Moveon bloggers and the Code Pink movement. Of course Moveon isn't bloggers, but he's subliminally tying the word bloggers to liberal political movements just as they used to tie liberal to the word media. I believe his primary target wasn't Moveon or code pink so much as the Internet in general. The Internet seems to be the last bastion of democracy and this is quite upsetting to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
15. I wonder if it also serves as a method of control
Whereas in another era we might already be at the torshes and pitchforks stage this helps some of us (myself guilty as charged) sleep better at night knowing we're doing "all we can" by speaking out. To like minded people and the deaf ears of others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I believe the optimum level of control is the one way communication
we had with newspapers, radio and television. Our dissatisfaction with the Iraq War began much earlier than Vietnam, in large part because the truth was with held for a longer period of time. When there are protests the corporate media don't cover them. I didn't even know Bush's limo was egged as he was going to take his inaugural until Michael Moore's movie Fahrenheit 9/11 came out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
17. Ask the people in Cuba where the government limits access:
Cuba law tightens internet access

The Cuban Government is tightening its control over internet access.
A new law coming into force on Saturday makes it impossible for many Cubans to dial up the internet from their home telephone lines.

The move has been criticised by the human rights group Amnesty International.

Cuba says that, given its limited resources, it needs to ensure that the internet is primarily used for the social good.

more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3425425.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
19. heil bushler
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
20. And the GOP did try and dominate the internet. If you were on the mixed
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 11:41 AM by applegrove
boards...and still attend..you would see all manner of talking points like: "Hitler was left wing" and "Germany's economy is bad because it is a mixed market Liberal one" (Germany's economy is bad because of huge immigration from the former Soviet Republics, the Middle East and the integration of East Germany which have combined with lack of control over the interest rate (they have the euro) to make for some tough times).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC