Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mukasey Pressured To Protect Bushco From Prosecution (Scott Horton)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:13 PM
Original message
Mukasey Pressured To Protect Bushco From Prosecution (Scott Horton)
The Torture Litmus Test
DEPARTMENT No Comment
BY Scott Horton
PUBLISHED November 2, 2007

Several days before his first meeting with the Senate Judiciary Committee, Michael Mukasey’s Justice Department handlers arranged a private meeting for him with a number of “movement conservatives.” Two different administration sources have described the meeting to me. During the meeting, Mukasey’s counterparts, largely figures associated with the Federalist Society, pushed him on two points in particular.

First, they wanted him to undertake that he would not appoint a special prosecutor to look into the U.S. attorneys scandal and related charges concerning political prosecutions. At this point it is clear that if an independent investigation were to be launched, it would quickly run head-on into some of the same figures who sat in the room with Mukasey. The email traffic which has surfaced already—and it is only a tiny fraction of the total—shows how Rove and Miers repeatedly relied upon the Federalist Society and its members to help them out in addressing recalcitrant U.S. Attorneys who would not debase their office by converting it into a political tool. Let’s be cynical and say that the first request they put to Mukasey was designed simply to protect themselves and keep their behind-the-scenes involvement with the Justice Department’s highest profile scandal so far out of the spotlight.

And second, they pushed aggressively on the torture question. They wanted Mukasey to pledge that he would toe the Administration’s line on “the Program,” that he would continue to protect those who authored the program with the cloak of an Attorney General opinion keeping them safe from prosecution.

more at:
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/11/hbc-90001567
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. The committee
must know of this, no? And yet they cave?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, but they wouldn't want to be all "partisan" or "confontational", or "Constitutional", y'know?
:puke: on the lot of them.

I'm about ready to fucking give up on these venal morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. There are 2 cavers: Schumer and Feinstein. only. direct your wrath at the right epople, and
quickly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. The presidential candidate who can really tap into
American rage will win hands down. Better Al Gore than a demagogue like Hitler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
4.  he would not appoint a special prosecutor to look into the U.S. attorneys scandal
I am so sick of this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. The US government tortures people
and nothing is being done about it

Well, nothing except continually enabling the guilty


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yep. It's in BushCo's interest to keep waterboarding under "Stress/Duress" and not torture. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. These two issues again....
Torture and the attorney firings. I'm surprised that the Plame affair didn't also get mentioned but it's interesting what two issues "they" are the most concerned about the Dems potentially accessing information.

Interesting, enlightening and disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-03-07 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. This story encapsulates how 'pukes operate holistically on every front and issue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC