Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Schumer, Feinstein ‘surprise’ thwarts efforts on Mukasey

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:05 PM
Original message
Schumer, Feinstein ‘surprise’ thwarts efforts on Mukasey
Is it too much to ask that these two watch KO?


Schumer, Feinstein ‘surprise’ thwarts efforts on Mukasey
By Manu Raju
November 06, 2007

The coordinated statements released late Friday afternoon by two Democratic senators that they would break ranks and support President Bush’s attorney general nominee largely muted opposition from a Democratic base that has become increasingly frustrated with Congress, activist leaders said Monday.

Sens. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) effectively thwarted plans by the activist left to use the weekend to mobilize ahead of Tuesday’s Judiciary Committee vote and pressure wayward senators to reject the nominee, activists said.

“It was a surprise attack,” said Caroline Fredrickson, director of the Washington legislative office for the American Civil Liberties Union, which wants the Judiciary Committee to defeat the nomination. “There was a limited opportunity to say much about what Schumer and Feinstein had done because the timing was very cleverly calculated to avoid scrutiny.”

With the support of Schumer, Feinstein and the committee’s nine Republicans, Mukasey has garnered enough support to clear the panel and move to the Senate floor.

Before Feinstein’s announcement, sent to the media by e-mail at about 4:28 p.m., the nomination had seemed in doubt, especially after Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) announced his opposition to Mukasey at a 3 p.m. news conference in Burlington, Vt. Leahy became the fifth Judiciary Committee Democrat to announce his opposition over Mukasey’s refusal to state explicitly that the interrogation technique known as waterboarding constitutes torture.

Hours before Leahy’s press conference, however, Schumer in a telephone call already had laid out his thoughts to the chairman and also relayed a message that Feinstein had planned to support the nominee, according to aides.

more...

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/schumer-feinstein-surprise-thwarts-efforts-on-mukasey-2007-11-06.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope all Californians and New Yorkers have called these
two Senators and told them about their sheer disgust into voting for this man Mukasey, again * is just saving his own a$$.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I did.
I got a "You're too stupid to understand the issues" letter from her office. Feinstein absolutely does not give a shit. Like the Bush administration, she doesn't even try to hid it anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder if Feinstein has known about waterboarding and is fearful
of an investigation into waterboarding...

If Mukasey admits that waterboarding is torture, he might have to look into who was doing it and who knew about it...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I wonder, if she knows, why she'd be fearful. She should be angry! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Feinstein sits on the Intelligence Committee...
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 09:25 PM by Postman
and she may have been one of the few Democrats that was briefed on the fact that this was going on. So maybe she was told that she would be one of those that will be prosecuted if there's an AG who looks into this stuff....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. BINGO
She is a war-profiteering self-serving scoundrel. Difi's tortured stance on torture is the last straw. She needs to retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Ahhh, gotcha! The plot thickens! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Who all were in on the war crimes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Her "cutting a deal" with Mukasey is exactly my concern! We need to be ready to recall Ahnuld!
Edited on Mon Nov-05-07 09:52 PM by calipendence
As I noted in this other thread I started the other day:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3682868&mesg_id=3682868

Why would she be so adamant about going after Gonzo and the attorneygate scandal before anyone else and now be so eager to approve Mukasey. Methinks she's covering up a skeleton in her closet and wants to make sure that the wheels are greased her way.

I think the thing we need to work for to try and get rid of Feinstein is to be ready to recall Arnold at a moment's notice if he gives us ammunition to do so. Getting him out of the way would:

1) Give her a cherry to go for (run for governor in the recall election) to get her out of the Senate seat, and then pick someone that we could all get behind to replace her in exchange for NOT going after her skeleton.

2) If not item 1, then get another progressive Dem elected into the governor's office who we know would replace her with a decent progressive Democrat and not a Repuke if the Dems were to decide to go after her for this "skeleton".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. DiFi has so many skeletons in her closet
she had to build a bigger house with more and bigger closets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. same old b*shit used for Pearl Harbor-for interests of National Security-YOU vill do vat ve vant nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't Want To Twist Arms?
Why, would that be considered torture?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Jesus, I actually feel sorry for the NYers and Californians, at least we know McCain is nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Feel more sorry for New Yorkers.
At least CAlifornia's junior Senator is Barbara Boxer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. The Felonious,
Phoney Phoenician? :)

And, I knew fuckchuck was a tool and di-fiend was traitor for years..nothing new here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. I thought it was reported over the weekend that she would not support his nomination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I haven't heard she's retracted anything. AFAIK, she's voting for confirmation. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. i called her office today, it took about 20 times to get through
"Yes the phones have been very busy today" I just bet they were. Anyhow i registered my complaint like i've done before and followed it up with a tersely written letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beltanefauve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Glad you got through
I didn't, and her voicemail was full, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. I called local and DC and got busy signals all day...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. i called the SF office, i stopped trying DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. How will they vote in the full Senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC