Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge slaps White House with restraining order (5 million missing e-mails)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 06:19 PM
Original message
Judge slaps White House with restraining order (5 million missing e-mails)

Judge Kennedy

U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy Jr. issued a temporary restraining order today against the White House, ordering its executive office to preserve all records and back-up copies of millions of missing e-mails.

“Defendants shall preserve media, no matter how described, presently in their possession or under their custody or control, that were created with the intention of preserving data in the event of its inadvertent destruction,” wrote Kennedy in a Nov. 12 opinion in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The order was sought by the National Security Archive, a public interest library at George Washington University, and the Washington-based watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

The groups alleged in separate, but now combined, complaints, that the preservation of more than 5 million missing e-mails is vital to the preservation of history as they reveal the inner thinking of President Bush’s top aides between 2002 and 2007.

“The judge’s order shows that the loss of the e-mail records is a serious problem,” said Meredith Fuchs, general counsel at the archive. The time span of the missing e-mails covers major events such as the war in Iraq; Hurricane Katrina; the dismissal of nine U.S. attorneys and the reauthorization of the Patriot Act.

“A lot of times, the government says “trust us, we will do the right thing,’” Fuchs said. “Judge Kennedey’s order shows he won’t just take their word for it. He will direct them to do the right thing.”

http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-blogs/washington/secrecy/entries/2007/11/12/judge_slaps_white_house_with_r.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R
for truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R; eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Lying cheating republicons screwing America
one more eggregious example of these lying cheating republicon homelanders anti-American campaign to destroy our government.

Impeach the entire diaper-wearing crowd of homelanders...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Now that the barn door is closed, someone should look for any horses.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. White House to Judge Kennedy: Go Cheney yourself!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. thank you BB, & big thank you to judge Kennedy
K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. happy to give the 14th rec
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. 5 million....that's what i would call a shit-load of e-mails
:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Silly Judge! This administration doesn't have to obey any stinkin' restraining order!!! Silly, silly
man. Besides that, I'm sure the emails are LONG gone!

K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cureautismnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Junior definitely needs restraining.
I'd prefer shackles or a strait-jacket, but I guess you gotta start somewhere...

Nice work, Judge Kennedy. It's refreshing to know that someone takes their oath seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petepillow Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. White House shrugs it off and stays the course
They will detail pick clean every last byte of data before any enforcing has begun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shanti Mama Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
25. no way will they comply
Why would they begin now when they've shown complete contempt for the law for so long?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. How pathetic when one must applaud the justice system for merely doing their job!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rabies1 Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #13
32. No kidding. It's gotten THAT horrible.
Why is doing the right thing so frickin rare?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. This can only mean one thing:
Time for Congress to pass some legislation LEGALIZING the destruction of electronic evidence by Republican White Houses led by short-statured, ill-tempered Morans!

We'll show 'em!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. A bit cynical are we?
What if this is just another nail in the coffin from a friend in the fight?

Just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. My thoughts exactly.
The Democratic Leadership can just tack it on the the bill giving immunity to the telecoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. make that RETROACTIVE LEGALIZATION and you're on! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
27. That would be funnier if it wasn't so close to the truth.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. CREDIT goes to CREW. They filed the motion and lawsuit
12 Nov 2007 // http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/30422

Today, U.S. District Judge Henry Kennedy granted Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington's (CREW) request for a temporary restraining order to prevent the White House from destroying back-up copies of millions of deleted emails while the lawsuit is pending.

CREW brought this lawsuit against the Executive Office of the President and the National Archives and Records Administration challenging their failure to restore and preserve millions of emails deleted from White House servers and to institute an effective electronic record-keeping system. When the White House refused to give adequate assurances that it would preserve back-up copies of the deleted emails -- the only source of these important historical records -- CREW sought a temporary restraining order.

In granting CREW's request for a temporary restraining order, the court rejected the White House's claim that it need not preserve all copies and that instead of an order, it should be permitted to file a declaration.

"Today's order is an important and necessary first step toward restoring and preserving for the public all the records of this administration, not just those self-selected for preservation by an administration committed more to secrecy than compliance with the law," Anne Weismann, CREW's Chief Counsel, said today.

SUPPORT CREW: http://www.citizensforethics.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. CREW is truly great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
44. WITHOUT A TRACE: THE MISSING WHITE HOUSE EMAILS + two confidential sources
There are at least "two confidential sources" working with CREW!!!

=====================
CREW RELEASES NEW REPORT -- WITHOUT A TRACE: THE MISSING WHITE HOUSE EMAILS AND THE VIOLATIONS OF THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT
http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/27607

12 Apr 2007 // Washington, DC — Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) today has released a report, WITHOUT A TRACE: The Missing White House Emails and the Violations of the Presidential Records Act, detailing the legal issues behind the story of the White House e-mail scandal.

In a startling new revelation, CREW has also learned through two confidential sources that the Executive Office of the President (EOP) has lost over five million emails generated between March 2003 and October 2005.

................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. we love you CREW! thank you! (and thanks for pointing this out coyote) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. Thank goodness for CREW.
Let's hope the WH doesn't treat this legal order like they do every single other one that they don't care for, and just ignore it.

Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
17. Nixon shrugged it all off confident that he had everything covered . ..
murderers to do his dirty work --- control of FBI, judges ---

This is second time around --- it looks like Cheney/Bush probably have a perfect system to protect themselves . . . they have no fear and we should take a lesson from that !!!!


Cheers to this judge --- and anyone whose trying to defy these criminals --- !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FREEWILL56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. If I had my way they'd have some fear because I'd strip them naked,
make them eat a box of exlax, and drop them down into northwestern Pakistan. Impeachment? Ha, we wouldn't need no stinking impeachment and we'd save a bundle trying them. I know that's cruel so maybe we could send them to one of the secret prison camps they have in various places to torture prisoners. I hear they're into watersports so they'll have fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Audio_Al Donating Member (536 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
23. Thanks, Bluebear. Remember how easy it was to get rid of something in DOS?
Edited on Tue Nov-13-07 02:34 AM by Audio_Al
c:\format c

or something like that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
24. Damned activist liberal uppity judge..
Who does he think he is?..some legal authority or something?

Everyone knows that no one has the right to challenge the president or his administration..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
26. Unfortunately, Bushies and other tyrannical thugs LAUGH at the puny pronouncements of weakling
judges.

They will do what they always do, and I guess this judge should be happy he is in Amerika and not another Third World country, where he would likely be hurt or killed. Here, the Bushies will retaliate on him non-violently, wrecking his career and the lives of his family, most likely.

But words mean NOTHING to a Bush or a Hitler. Make all the puny judicial pronouncement you want and see what happens.

Nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Abramoff, Ney, et.al., are laughing behind bars and prisoner numbers
and they are just the first few. Laugh as much as they may wish, but the wheels of justice roll on, like a relentless steam roller, slow and ever so effective at flattening evil humps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. The parts of America that are still functioning do not necessarily imply all parts are functioning
Edited on Tue Nov-13-07 09:51 AM by tom_paine
I have said it before and I will say it again, the New Totalitarianism is both age-old and also unique in it's current "kinder-and-gentler" from which blends many of the no-longer functioning aspects of democracy (such as Pakistani-like "elections" and a Congress which more closely resembles a Chinese People's Congress or a Roman Imperial Senate than any I have seen before).

Yes, those parts of America that still function rustily, those aspects of the Executive Branches that have not yet been Bushified/Nazified still give the appearance that all is healthy.

Perhaps that is what it is meant to do :tinfoilhat: , but more likely it is just that a nation with as rich and old a tradition of freedom and self-governance cannot be stopped and turned on a dime. Plus there are still too many people, judges and law enforcement who take their oaths and duties to country seriously still. They refuse to understand the New Totalitarianism and the New Paradigm. They will all eventually be shifted out of places where they can wield any of their anachronistic beliefs. Before that, they will be punished in other ways as so many of the enemies of the BushPutinist State have been punished, usually non-violently by destruction of the ability to make money, discrediting of one's character using the Mighty Wurlitzer, or just good-old=fashioned going after people's families (watch the 47 minute Naomi Wolf lecture for more info on this.

I hope you are right, L Coyote, I simply do not see it, in spite of the fact that some 20% of America still functions as it used to during the Days of the Old Republic, and in spite of the fact that none of these actions are directed at anyone who REALLY MATTERS to the Busheviks (Abramoff was a Jew who was never really one of them, and who's usefulness had outlived itself after his exposure, and Ney just is one of many Imperial Congresscritters who are "clones" (RNC people were found to be calling their own candidates this, when they thought no one was listening) that can be mass-produced, so to speak, by the thousands if necessary. Ney is therefore almost as expendable when crunch time comes as any Bushie Patsy who doesn't really mater to them (Powell, Abramoff, etc.)

In a decaying and moribund nation, who's people have regressed to the very things we rebelled against in 1776, such people are top be found in every corner, nook and cranny of the halls of power. They are as ubiquitous as in any monarchical or totalitarian nation.

Time shall answer our question, won't it? The big "election" of 2008 will save us and put everything right. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. Mafias and organized criminals function as a group and protect the leader, like Iran-Contra
and this is the Iran-Contra crime family, The Enterprise et.al., at work again. They were not all convicted and jailed then, and likely it will be no easier to do such now. The boss criminal is always well-insulated; that's the modis operandi of organized crime.

That said, when the crooks print "Corrupt Bastards Club" tee-shirts and caps, I think the People get the picture much better. It was Sam Irwin who famously said (paraphrasing), "If you paint a really good picture of a cow, you don't have to write "cow" under it."

This time around they added the label themselves. :rofl: If stupid was a crime ......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
29. The King hasn't got time for no stinkin' judge.
They're hitting the "delete" button at this very moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
30. K&R
:kick:

I don't suppose the WH will comply...IMHO they'll thumb their noses at this order just like they have thumbed their noses at subpoenas.....but I applaud the judge's effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
33. IN A RELATED STORY...
THE WHITEHOUSE DESTROYED MILLIONS MORE EMAILS, STATING THAT THEY NEVER RECEIVED THE ORDER TO NOT DO THAT... SEEMS THE ORDER WAS DESTROYED BY A RETROACTIVE EMAIL DESTRUCTION BUG IN THE SYSTEM.

FROM HIS UNDISCLOSED LOCATION, VICE PRESIDENT "WHOS NAME WE CANNOT SPEAK" SAID, ON PROMISE OF ANNONYMINITY, THAT HE COULDN'T RECALL THE ACTION, BUT THAT THE PERSON WHO DIDN'T DO IT WOULD NOT BE PROSECUTED IF HE WERE NOT FOUND GUILTY.

PRESIDENT W, AWAKENING FROM HIS STUPOR AGREED, AND SAID INDEED WE HAVE JUST TURNED A CORNER, AND THAT WE ARE BACK WHERE WE STARTED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
34. Yeah, cali posted about this yesterday afternoon.
Seems like too little, too late to me.

I hope I'm wrong... but if history is any guide... *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
37. How long before Rush and Hannity start calling Kennedy a traitor
or digging up some obscure or trivial piece of crap from his past?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
38. Ordered to preserve the missing e-mails?
Does that seem like a strange order? Like herding unicorns.

Anyway, I'm sure the administration will happily comply. (or not)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
39. Rove was a spammer!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clarence swinney Donating Member (673 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
40. Great Source
Today Buzz interview with John Dean do not miss it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
41. Thanks for the post Blue,
good info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
42. Thank you Judge Henry Kennedy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
43. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
45. DU Archive thread: Remember when this story broke
There was a ton of misdirection afoot! This "problem" has someone quite worried.

=============================================================
Email-Gate FACTS: Felons, georgewbush.com, gwb43.com , et. al.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x523978
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
46. WA POST: Where Are the E-mails? By Dan Froomkin
"defendants shall preserve media, no matter how described, presently in their possession or under their custody or control, that were created with the intention of preserving data in the event of its inadvertent destruction. Defendants shall preserve the media under conditions that will permit their eventual use, if necessary, and shall not transfer said media out of their custody or control without leave of this court."

=======================
Where Are the E-mails? By Dan Froomkin
Nov 13, 2007 - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2007/11/13/BL2007111300956.html?hpid=opinionsbox1


Why is it taking White House officials so long to restore millions of deleted e-mails from the backup tapes they claim to have?

The e-mails in question date from March 2003 to October 2005 -- a crucial period that includes the Iraq invasion, a presidential election and Hurricane Katrina.

White House officials have known for more than two years that the messages were deleted -- a clear violation of presidential records-preservation statutes. But the president's aides won't explain what happened, what sort of backups they have and what they're doing about it.

That obstinacy led a federal judge to step in yesterday and order the White House to preserve every bit of related data in its possession -- just to make sure nothing untoward happens while a civil suit .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
47. Woohoo! Honorable Judge Kennedy!
Swaaaaaeeet! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
48. Excellent
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
49. Woohoo Judge
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sancho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
50. The best news of the week....
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC