cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 06:28 PM
Original message |
Breaking: Judge orders White House to hold e-mails |
|
By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - A federal judge Monday ordered the White House to preserve copies of all its e-mails, a move that Bush administration lawyers had argued strongly against. U.S. District Judge Henry Kennedy directed the Executive Office of the President to safeguard the material in response to two lawsuits that seek to determine whether the White House has destroyed e-mails in violation of federal law.
The White House is seeking dismissal of the lawsuits brought by two private groups — Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Government and the National Security Archive.
The organizations allege the disappearance of 5 million White House e-mails. The court order issued by Kennedy, an appointee of President Clinton, is directed at maintaining backup tapes which contain copies of White House e-mails.
The Federal Records Act details strict standards prohibiting the destruction of government documents including electronic messages, unless first approved by the archivist of the United States.
Justice Department lawyers had urged the courts to accept a proposed White House declaration promising to preserve all backup tapes.
<snip>
|
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 06:30 PM
Response to Original message |
1. One more step in the right direction. |
|
Someone needs to go to jail and evidence needs to be preserved.
|
Mike03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. It is a step in the right direction, but how many times have we |
|
heard that so-and-so has been ordered to preserve emails? Honestly, what good has come out of that?
Seize. Restore. Report to the American people.
|
Mike03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message |
2. They need to seize the computers |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-12-07 06:34 PM by Mike03
I don't trust the WH to keep anything, but forensic technicians can reassemble deleted emails.
|
kestrel91316
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. The computers from that time period have probably been sledgehammered already. |
Mike03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. True. The way things are going now, the CIA probably |
|
helps the Whitehouse to defrag their hard drives so that they truly can obliterate the emails.
They need to make unannounced raids on Bush and Cheney and Rice and just seize their hard drives. I'm sick and tired of seeing these embarrassing committee meetings where Conyers or Waxman beg and plead for information from prevaricating witnesses.
|
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Not if they burned or demagnetized the tapes and hard drives. |
|
I'm guessing that happened long ago.
But, missing data is as bad or worse than hidden data in this case. So they're probably screwed either way.
|
Mike03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. So data on the hardrive can be destroyed completely? |
|
Even to the point where the FBI cannot restore it?
If so, somehow that doesn't surprise me, especially since Cheney has the CIA on his side.
These committee meeting where they plead with witnesses are such a huge embarrassment.
|
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Remember Zaphod Beeblebrox's threat ... |
|
"Computer, if you don't open these doors right now, I'm going to reprogram your hard drive with a large axe ..."
|
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
14. It can be done with a degaussing coil from an old computer monitor |
|
I don't claim to be an expert on the subject, but any magnetic media can be completely erased (unrecoverable) with a magnet that's powerful enough.
|
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
11. If they can find the hard drives on the bottom of the Potomac |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 06:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The crooks in the WH have likely covered all their tracks.
|
Parche
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. Maybe, but it's not that easy to do.. |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. I sure hope you're right! |
|
I remember when the disappearing e-mails story first surfaced... people said as much.
I'm runing low on hope these past couple weeks.
:hug:
|
Mike03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-12-07 07:15 PM by Mike03
It may be true that they can utterly destroy a hard drive, but it would be difficult within the confines and context of the White House to do this (with brute force) without it being obvious.
The important question is, is the FBI on our side, or the administration's side?
They can retrieve a hell of a lot from not just a hard drive but an email header or attached file or diskette. That's how they captured the BTK killer--he made a very simple mistake with a diskette.
|
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 06:43 PM
Response to Original message |
12. This has as about as much likelihood of making a difference as |
|
the police wanting to talk to Cheney after his friend got shot in the face ... or any acknowledgement of the court order demanding the list of people he met with in Feb 2001 ...
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-12-07 06:48 PM
Response to Original message |
16. meanwhile they allege 5 Million destroyed....criminals |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 11:35 PM
Response to Original message |