MLFerrell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-15-07 07:10 PM
Original message |
Who will JackORoses propel to the front of the pack in the great 2007 DU Fun Run? |
|
Not knowing a thing about JackORoses, I can't say. But I'll hazard a guess: Barack Obama.
Anyone with more information care to postulate?
|
Mojambo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-15-07 07:11 PM
Response to Original message |
Bicoastal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-15-07 07:13 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I think he's probably a Kucinich supporter. |
|
If his candidate is in front, why should he take him out of the lead?
|
MLFerrell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-15-07 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. That would be a logical conclusion. |
|
Unless he's waiting for a last minute coup d'DU!
:rofl:
|
SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-15-07 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Woop-dee-doo... a coup d'DU poetic, isn't it? :) nt |
MLFerrell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-15-07 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. One of my better ones. |
|
:)
And now, a somewhat snowy drunken evening awaits.
Have a good one, SoCalDem.
:toast:
|
SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-15-07 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. oooh.. snow.. sounds delightful |
|
especially from the land of hot sandy dirt..year round :(
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-15-07 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. Nope. He's for Gore. He's made no secret about it. n/t |
kdmorris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-15-07 07:19 PM
Response to Original message |
5. And who will crickets freeze? |
|
Inquiring minds want to know
|
Blashyrkh
(816 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-15-07 07:31 PM
Response to Original message |
6. He started a thread yesterday I think, |
|
saying that Gore supporters should save their steps as their candidate will be making a move.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:41 PM
Response to Original message |