Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blue Dog Democrats: Conservative, Or Just Plain Corrupt?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 07:21 AM
Original message
Blue Dog Democrats: Conservative, Or Just Plain Corrupt?
Blue Dog Democrats: Conservative, Or Just Plain Corrupt?

Through their ethics scandals, Republicans in Washington long ago began making the word “conservative” synonymous with the term “corrupt.” Surprisingly, though, it is a group of Democrats that is cementing this definitional conversion for good.

In the midst of the housing crisis, a cadre of self-described “conservative” Democrats called the Blue Dog Coalition is demanding congressional leaders delay legislation designed to help people trapped in high-interest loans stay in their homes and avoid foreclosure. The bill, House Resolution 3609, allows judges to ameliorate the terms of abusive “subprime” mortgages. Rep. Brad Miller, D-N.C., is championing it-a gutsy move for a lawmaker whose state domiciles major lenders.

The Blue Dogs say they oppose Miller’s initiative out of concern for the integrity of the 2005 Bankruptcy Bill-a telling justification. Under that odious law, millionaires can shield their mansions from creditors, and corporate executives (think: Enron guys) can prevent ripped-off shareholders and employees from seizing their holdings. Harvard’s Elizabeth Warren notes that the law also “permits people with vacation homes and investment property to rework their mortgages in bankruptcy.”

But regular homeowners? Sorry-without Miller’s legislation, judges are barred from defending you against the vultures.

Read More ...


Maintaining "integrity" of the 2005 Bankruptcy Bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. I vote corrupt
I vote that the majority of them are actually republicans that couldn't get elected as republicans so they crossed over into our party and polluted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. And, they make the 'big tent' argument harder to accept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't buy the "big tent" theory anymore
the only ones espousing it are those that call themselves "centrists"...I call them republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Agree. It opens the gateway to "get back to you" politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I reject the "big tent" idea.
There is a place for undemocratic ideas on the other side of the aisle. When they are on our side of the aisle, they produce a sabotaging effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. The "Big Tent" might be ok to visit, but I don't want to live there.
And, the ringmasters are a pain in the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. corrupt, complicit, corporate criminals
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. You forgot to mention cowardly
Mnay have never seen an issue that they wouldn't back down on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. Scared Shit
Most Blue Dogs are in blue or red districts...many barely won their seats and are the first ones being targeted by the GOOP. While its easy to sit in a safely blue area and condemn Blue Dogs these people DO represent more conservative areas and their voting records will reflect that. They tend to bend to the "conventional wisdom" as any little backlash in their areas can mean the difference in being re-elected. The Democratic party is a big tent...and if it is to be a majority party, there must be room for those who do have "conservative" values. Better to have them in the tent than outside trying to tear it down.

That said, I was a strong critic of the bankruptcy bill and this vote is a major reason I will not vote for my Democratic Blue Dog...and am supporting her challenger in the primary. Anyone with a modicum of financial education (which is me) could see that tightening bankruptcy redress was going to lead to a lot of foreclosures and bankruptcies. It was pure greed that has driven this sub-prime mess by an industry that knows the booosh regime has and will bail it out....just like daddy did during the S & L mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. No way are they scared. Blue Dogs champion robber baron causes
not because they live in red states. They do it because they believe in a free and unfettered market for owners. They believe that no regulation should stand in the way of corporate profit.

They are not scared to go against their conservative voters. The Blue Dogs are scared that their Democratic Party mask slips and voters find out that they are true blue robber baron GOPers down to the very core of their souls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Most excellently succinct.
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leaninglib Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
11. I assume you would like to see more Republicans in the house.
Just as there are liberal (for) Republicans, there are conservative (for) Democrats. When the votes are close, these members typically decide which way it goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Nope.
Just less republican ideology leaning democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. and with the blue dogs
it almost certainly goes the way of the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. It would be great if the DCCC stopped supporting Blue Dogs in primaries
The Democratic party and the DLC/BlueDogs have no business recruiting Democrats to run in primaries where there is already a good candidate. The Democratic party takes our donations and recruits a GOPer, slaps a BlueDog mask on him and tells him to go out and defeat the progressive democratic candidate who would just ruin everything for the "centrists".

The DCCC and DSCC has no business meddling in primaries. They are supposed to be there to fight GOPers, not support GOPer BlueDogs to defeat Progressive Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. recruiting repukes/dlc blue dogs and smothering real democrats is Rahm's way
and if you think 2006 was bad he is on a tear for 2008. This party has been completely corrupted by emmanuel and his ilk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brazos121200 Donating Member (626 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
15. In a political system like ours where
everybody is presumably a supporter of capitalism it becomes necessary to incorporate the "blue dogs" into the party. Without these blue dogs in the house the Democrats would still be in the minority. Yes, they are apologists for corporate greed and misdeeds, welcome to American politics. I think the bankruptcy bill was odious but it is only symptomatic of the power of corporate money in our system. What the big corporation want they usually get sooner or later, and historically the Democratic party has been a big part of this process. To drive the blue dogs over to the Repubs only strengthens the power of that party and weakens ours, and God knows we need all the help we can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. I think they are some of the sneaky republicans, who filed as
democrats because they knew they'd never get the position as a republican nor the funding. So they are stealer's. They stole the Democrat name and money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
18. They are politicians. Attaining and holding on to power any way they can.
“Now, the man on the stand he wants my vote,
He's a-runnin' for office on the ballot note.
He's out there preachin' in front of the steeple,
Tellin' me he loves all kinds-a people.
(He's eatin' bagels
He's eatin' pizza
He's eatin' chitlins
He's eatin' bullshit!)”

Bob Dylan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC