Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How does your family wealth stack up ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Wiregrass Willie Donating Member (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:15 PM
Original message
How does your family wealth stack up ?
I ran across a figure today that I'd like to share with DU. Warren Buffett -- supposed to be the 2nd richest man in the world -- owns 2,567,455 shares of Berkshire Hathaway (brka) stock. So what ?

BKRA is valued on the NYSE at $140,000 a share. But wait. I can't find the current figure, but in 2004 the median net worth of American families was $93,100. If we do the arithmetic, we will see that one share of Mr Buffett's holding is worth 150% of what the median American family is worth. If we multiply the number of shares he holds by 1.5, we will see that Mr Buffett is worth the combined net worth of 3,851,182 middle class American families.

Buffett is the most honest of the super rich. He is the one who said that the rich are fighting a class war -- and they are winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Should I stack the quarters first or the pennies?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Now, that is pretty funny
:rofl:

I have my dime rolls going....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's now what you own that matters - It's who you own nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ha! Hahahahahahaha! -n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. The median net worth is 93,100? B.S. it is....


Most people don't have any savings & they are in debt up to their ears & over!

Isn't the median the smack middle? It isn't average is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. yep it is - but remember net worth
Edited on Mon Dec-03-07 02:32 PM by dmallind
isn't just savings. It's home equity, 401ks, accrued pensions etc too. AND easily saleable assets such as cars, collectibles, etc.

You can have 25K in credit card debt and no retirement but if your home has a $50K mortgage left from buying it fifteen years ago and is worth $168,100 then you have $93.1K in net worth.

I'd say it's safe to bet that for a lot of the middle class most of their net worth is in their homes. If you include pensions and 401k that's a very very safe assumption well into the upper-middle classes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankenforpres Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. it's a bad stat
id like to see it without primary residence included


i bet the median is pretty dire then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. It would certainly be much worse
401ks have helped a lot of people build some net worth, but like anything else that is voluntary it requires action and priorities to be assigned, so does not reach everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. House, 401K, assets
Yeah, the upper 10%, with the few thousand of the upper 30%, probably averages out to $93,100. It would be nice to see the figures if you took out the upper 2%, the ones who have accumulated a million or more including their house. I think we'd see much lower figures, and much more in keeping with the majority of Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankenforpres Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. median should account for that
i would agree that average or mean is a worthless stat in this regard, but median should be the middle person. 93K seems high to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. No it wouldn't
Take 100 people. Give 2 $10 million in assets. Give 48, $75,000 in assets. Give 30 $10,000 in assets. And give 20 nothing. 98 people only have $3,900,000 in assets. Of course the top 2% will skew the results, always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankenforpres Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. in your example
the initial median is between 10K and 75K, without the top 2, it is 10K for sure





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. "A Million or More Including the House" Based on Bubblicious Real-Estate Valuations
doesn't make you a millionaire, especially now that the bubble is going poof.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiregrass Willie Donating Member (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. That's right. Half have more - half have less
Here's an interesting site. Type in various ages and incomes and see what you get.

http://cgi.money.cnn.com/tools/networth_ageincome/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Most people's net worth is in their home equity.
And until a house is sold, that is just theoretical -- and in the past year, has become more and more theoretical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. But the age old question remains
...while there is no doubt that Warren Buffett is unquestionably rich, there is also no doubt there are but a scant few even on that order of magnitude.

Clearly then the "rich" must extend a bit further down from these outliers. But where do they start?

If the median net worth is $93,100 then surely "rich" must be substantially above that - or half the nation would be "rich".

So where, again the big question, does "rich" begin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankenforpres Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. im rich
i have a wife who loves me, an apartment that's warm in the cold and cool when it's warm, enough food to eat, and health vision and dental insurance

i also like my job


i certainly dont have $93K, im negative a little less than that in student loans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Worldwide, I would say I am in the top 10% of all human earners
but I only make $25,500.

I am rich, but not in an Mericka, wax my Hbummer sort of way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Is that really so?
I know Buffett is insanely and sickeningly rich, but 2,567,455 shares at $140,000 a pop is equal to more than a third of a trillion dollars. I didn't think anyone on earth had that much money, yet alone has that much money invested in a single stock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. According to wikipedia, Buffet is worth about $52 billion.
Edited on Mon Dec-03-07 03:08 PM by Jim__
wikipedia. That would be about 371,000 shares of brk.a.

He's no piker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. I worked as a temp at Northern Trust Bank in Chicago once
They had a division called "Substantial Families". When I first heard the term I thought they were all overweight. Then I realized they were the uber-rich and needed bankers to help them with their money. Bankers who held special weekend seminars for them.

I wondered if they had Substantial Family Dysfunction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. Wealth? what is this wealth that you speak of? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. That stack is around here somewhere. When I find it, I'll tell you.
Darn, the stack's so flat, I can never find it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SyntaxError Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. I'm only worth about $21,444,991....
Edited on Mon Dec-03-07 03:28 PM by SyntaxError
I cheat when I play The Sims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
25. Mr. Buffett understands
that being rich surrounded by hundreds of millions of heavily armed poor with nothing left to loose is not a desirable situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Hence gun control legislation?
There's a reason for that 2nd amendment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
27. How my "wealth" stacks up.....
...triple it and it would scarcely be a speedbump on the road to riches....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC