Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

YELLOWSTONE DOUBLES ITS CELL PHONE USE AMID TOWER STRUGGLES

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-06-07 07:14 PM
Original message
YELLOWSTONE DOUBLES ITS CELL PHONE USE AMID TOWER STRUGGLES
There's just something wrong, wrong, wrong, about cell towers in Yellowstone.
--###--

original-peer

For Immediate Release: December 6, 2007
Contact: Carol Goldberg (202) 265-7337

YELLOWSTONE DOUBLES ITS CELL PHONE USE AMID TOWER STRUGGLES

Park Ignores Agency Policy to Limit Government Cell Phones to Verified Need

Washington, DC — Even as Yellowstone National Park officials finalize a plan to chart the future for cell towers in the nation’s most famous park, more and more park employees are being given government-paid cell phones, according to internal documents released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). Yellowstone’s growing reliance on official cell phones appears to ignore National Park Service policy limiting issuance of phones only when absolutely necessary.

Park records obtained by PEER under the Freedom of Information Act indicate employees were issued 70 cell phones in 2004 but by August 2006 that number had grown to 188 employee cell phones. As of November 14, 2007, the park counts 155 employee phones but this number reflects off-season usage and may grow again this spring.

In 2005, Yellowstone spent $92,000 in cell phone charges and nearly $94,000 in 2006. Thus far in 2007, the park has spent $63,000. Prior to 2005, the park was illegally receiving free phones and minutes while improperly depositing lease fees in its own accounts rather than the U.S. Treasury as required.

“How can Yellowstone objectively develop a wireless plan when almost half of its staff has been made cell phone dependent?” asked PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch, noting that more than 40% of the park’s 380 full-time permanent employees have government-paid cell phones. “During this entire debate, the park has never set forth its own perceived cellular needs and expectations, even though these factors are clearly relevant to their decision-making.”

National Park Service policy limits issuance of cell phones to when it “is necessary for the employees to perform Service work.” Additionally, the need must be documented and validated in official forms.

Yellowstone Park lacks any written plan or protocol to determine which of its employees receives a government cell phone. In response to the PEER Freedom of Information Act request, the park could not produce any document spelling out who gets phones or why the number has changed, writing in its transmittal letter, “We have completed a thorough search of our records and have enclosed all documents responsive to your request.”

The future of Yellowstone’s five cell towers, including one clearly visible from much of the Old Faithful Historical District, will be determined by the plan due out in early 2008. PEER believes that a new, stricter policy with respect to cell towers and cell phone use is warranted, and recently praised park officials for raising concerns about the potential impacts of a proposed 150-foot cell tower just outside the park’s northern boundary in Gardiner, Montana.

“Yellowstone officials can hardly expect park visitors to shut out the ceaseless chatter of the modern world when it keeps passing out free phones to its own employees,” Ruch added. “Will any corner of Yellowstone remain outside the electronic blanket of cellular coverage?”

###













complete release including links to related sources here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-06-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Seems as if park employees could use radios, and let the cell-phone users
do without. I hate their ubiquity in quiet and peaceful places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-06-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. why are two way radios or satellite phones not an acceptable alternative?
Edited on Thu Dec-06-07 07:17 PM by wuushew
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC