Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rockefeller: Actually, I Just Found Out About the Destroyed Torture-Tapes Yesterday

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 05:19 PM
Original message
Rockefeller: Actually, I Just Found Out About the Destroyed Torture-Tapes Yesterday
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004855.php

Rockefeller: Actually, I Just Found Out About the Destroyed Torture-Tapes Yesterday
By Spencer Ackerman - December 7, 2007, 4:51PM

Take two! Senate intelligence committee chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) had said yesterday that the CIA told him about its destruction of videotaped interrogations in "November 2006." But oops -- in a new statement just released to the press, he says he spoke too soon. It turns out he knew about the tapes' existence in 2003, but only found out about their destruction yesterday. Rocky:

"Last night, the CIA informed me that it believes that the leadership of the Senate Intelligence Committee was told of the decision to destroy the tapes in February 2003 but was not told of their actual destruction until a closed committee hearing held in November 2006.

"The committee has located no record of either being informed of the 2003 CIA decision or being notified late last year of the tapes having being destroyed. A review of the November 2006 hearing transcript finds no mention of tapes being destroyed.

"While the existence of the videotapes was known to me in 2003 in my capacity as then-Vice Chairman of the committee, I was not told of the CIA’s decision to destroy the tapes and I was not aware of their destruction until yesterday’s press reports."


The CIA shares so much information with Rockefeller, he must have just been confused. Who can keep it straight? In any event, Rockefeller knew since 2003 that some interrogations were videotaped, and he kept his mouth shut. Here's what he said he did.

"In May 2005, I wrote the CIA Inspector General requesting over a hundred documents referenced in or pertaining to his May 2004 report on the CIA’s detention and interrogation activities. Included in my letter was a request for the CIA to provide to the Senate Intelligence Committee the CIA’s Office of General Counsel report on the examination of the videotapes and whether they were in compliance with the August 2002 Department of Justice legal opinion concerning interrogation. The CIA refused to provide this and the other detention and interrogation documents to the committee as requested, despite a second written request to CIA Director Goss in September 2005."


Let's see the release of these letters. And more than that: Rockefeller is pledging a full investigation in the Senate intelligence committee. Once again, Matt has it right. Rockefeller needs to start snitching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. meanwhile, Harman says she was informed in 2005 of the destruction
(pending?) and did/said nothing.

Are these people in the same committee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Supposedly, per this, she sent a memo telling them NOT to destroy the tapes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. NO! She is NOT saying that. She is saying she was NOT informed.
Where are you getting your information? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Per post #2, she was informed and responded in writing NOT to
destroy the tapes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't know why the heck he's on the intelligence committee, not being the brightest,...
,...crayon in the box. Okay, well, maybe that IS why he's on there.

I believe him, though. He was likely informed there were video tapes of CIA interrogation and told all activities were conducted lawfully. I also believe he was NEVER informed those tapes were destroyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkySue Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. In 2005
the Repukes were in charge. No way that committee was going to do anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. excellent point. Rocky and Harman were merely acting like abused wives
which they were, (of the Bushies) at that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
known unknowns that we know and the unknown unknowns that we don't know we know....

snort
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-07-07 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why do I think Jay Rockefeller is full of shit?
Edited on Fri Dec-07-07 09:41 PM by Postman
WHere was this guy is the run up to war with Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC