Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conyers, Kennedy Join Push for Special Prosecutor To Investigate Destroyed Tapes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 04:35 PM
Original message
Conyers, Kennedy Join Push for Special Prosecutor To Investigate Destroyed Tapes
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004924.php

Conyers, Kennedy Join Push for Special Prosecutor
By Paul Kiel - December 17, 2007, 2:17PM

When news broke that the CIA had kept videotapes showing torture of detainees secret and then secretly destroyed them, Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) was fast out of the gate: the scandal "leads right into the White House," he said, and the need for a special prosecutor was clear.

But that was about it. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) was quick to dismiss the need for one, saying that Congressional inquiries were enough. And the hard-charging investigation led by the House intelligence committee seemed to indicate that might be true. When Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ), a member of the House intelligence committee, wrote Attorney General Michael Mukasey to formally request the appointment of a special prosecutor, expectations were low.

As expected, Mukasey said no. Or as he put it in a letter to Congress Friday, "I am aware of no facts at present to suggest that Department attorneys cannot conduct this inquiry in an impartial manner."

But with the Department rebuffing Congressional inquiries, Rockefeller's rationale has been turned on its head. The momentum seems to have shifted.

On Friday, House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) said in a statement that Mukasey's "disturbing" refusal to answer Congressional questions about the tapes' destruction "calls into question whether the Department of Justice is best able to investigate these matters.”

And the same day, Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) echoed Sen. Biden's comments from the week before.

Put all that together and you now have the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee and two prominent members of the Senate Judiciary Committee leaning towards a special prosecutor. Whether that momentum builds any more depends largely on how successful the House intelligence committee is in defying the Justice Department's attempt to stifle its investigation. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has said that he would call for a special prosecutor if the committee's don't get cooperation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Two of our finest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thepurpose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well thanks Sen. Reid. Do you have time to take away from your bending over for the admin to do
that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'd ask the same of Rockefeller. Why this is no big deal to him baffles me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It is so damn obvious that Mukasey has to recuse himself from
this case. He was the Judge in the Padilla Case. A Special Prosecutor absolutely must be appointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC