Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitz arrives for court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dancingme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 09:55 AM
Original message
Fitz arrives for court
He looks ready to deliver his closing.



Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald arrives at federal court in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 20, 2007. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)



Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald arrives at federal court for the perjury trial of Lewis 'Scooter' Libby, former chief of staff to U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney, in Washington February 20, 2007. Attorneys are due to make their closing arguments in the perjury case against Libby on Tuesday. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque (UNITED STATES)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Who Cares Anymore....
Edited on Tue Feb-20-07 10:01 AM by rsmith6621


Cheney wasn't called......Scooter trial ain't going to do anything to encourage congress to investigate the corpution around the Iraq occupation nor is it going to bring down the * administration any lower than it is.....frankly the trial was a waste of my tax $$$$.


In all do reality the trail was that lil clip between OBITS and the Auto sale at the Dodge dealership...most people still don't know it happened...

Plame doesn't get her justice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. silly n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I care.
As long as the spotlight is on even one of the many lies of this administration,
I care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dancingme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. would you rather the media focus on Britney Spears' head?
and Anna Nicole's baby?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. She'll bust it wide open with the civil suit
Don't misunderestimate her, Joe, and their lawyers. Or Fitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. oh yeah? Murray Waas speculates Cheney on prosecutor's radar:
http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/021907nj1.htm

If Libby is found guilty, investigators are likely to probe further to determine if Libby devised what they consider a cover story in an effort to shield Cheney. They want to know whether Cheney might have known about the leaks ahead of time or had even encouraged Libby to provide information to reporters about Plame's CIA status, the same sources said.

Special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald and defense attorneys for Libby are expected to begin their closing arguments in the case as early as Tuesday morning. Defense attorneys for Libby had said for months that they were going to call Cheney as a defense witness, but informed Federal District Court Judge Reggie Walton, who has presided over the Libby trial, at the last minute that they were not going to call him after all.

Had Cheney testified, he would have been questioned about whether he encouraged, or had knowledge of, the leaking of Plame's CIA status. Sources close to the case say that Cheney would have also been sharply questioned as to why, when presented by Libby with what prosecutors regarded as a cover story to explain away Libby's role in the leak, Cheney did nothing to discourage him.

<snip>

"If Cheney was merely showing surprise and interest at what Libby indicating to him he was going to tell investigators, then the vice president is innocent in the exchange," Richman said. "But if he had reason to believe, or personal knowledge, that what Libby was planning to say was untrue then there is good reason to view Cheney's conduct in an entirely different light -- an obstruction interpretation."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzwinders Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. I care n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. Go Fitz!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'm praying for ya Fitz!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. self-delete. Mis-post. n/t
Edited on Tue Feb-20-07 10:17 AM by Dora
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. I can see it now...
If this jury somehow finds I. Louis Libby "Not Guilty" (God forbid), a lot of DUers will fault Patrick Fitzgerald for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Won't happen.
Scooter will be convicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I sure hope so!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC