Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Angry Populace Burning British Surveillance Cameras

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 03:39 PM
Original message
Angry Populace Burning British Surveillance Cameras
Angry Populace Burning British Surveillance Cameras
By Bruce Sterling EmailDecember 22, 2007 | 9:22:25 AM



(((Woah. This looks like a sport with a bright future.)))
http://www.speedcam.co.uk/gatso2.htm Link: Speed Cameras.

"This page is probably the highlight of the entire site. To my knowledge this is the largest collection of wrecked Gatsos on the internet, and its growing rapidly. So long as these cameras are robbing motorists of their cash they will continue to be destroyed.

"Five Gatsos have just gone up in Nuneaton. One of them was completely destroyed before it had even gone live. The workmen hadn't even finished installing it...."



(((And check out the chest-pounding vigilante manifesto here... my goodness me.)))
http://www.speedcam.co.uk/index2.htm

"A Summer of MADness?

"Motorists Against Detection, the vigilante anti-speed camera group have announced a summer of MADness which will see them target for destruction all speed cameras in the UK. It’s now going to be a period of zero tolerance against all speed cameras, said their campaigns director Capt Gatso. (((A remote descendant of General Ludd, I reckon.)))

"The group claims speed cameras are just money-making machines and they have given the authorities long enough to prove their worth. The first camera to fall in the summer campaign is in south east London on the A2 at the Sun in the Sands roundabout on-slip heading northbound towards the Blackwall Tunnel.

"Capt Gatso, the group's campaigns director, (((he's a multitalented guy))) said: "We have completely pulled it out of the ground, it is now lying flat. You can see some of our handiwork posted on www.speedcam.co.uk.

"He added: In many areas the cameras have not saved one life - the statistics for road deaths haven't gone down. In some areas they have actually gone up - in Essex, for instance, which has a high density of cameras there are more people being killed. We are now planning to target any and all cameras until the Government sees sense and rethinks its road safety policy. Before we had speed cameras we had the safest roads in Europe - since their introduction this is no longer true."

more...

http://blog.wired.com/sterling/2007/12/burning-british.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Soon to come: cameras to watch the cameras
count on it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Or camouflaged cameras. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bless them. There are cameras on every traffic light in the closest town
They can capture your face I am told, they can certainly read your license plate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. An inspiration for those of us here in the US
Not just red light cameras and such, but cameras all over. Hell, you can hardly step foot outside without being on film anymore. One of the more depressing, and infuriating trends that I've seen during my lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Yup, it was really great...
...when one of the neighborhood junkie assholes spraypainted over the lenses of our CCTV cameras the day before some other lunatic set fire to the rubbish bins next to the house across from our office and nearly burned the damned house down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hear, hear! Direct action against the surveillance state. Cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. ROFL ! It'll replace shooting out streetlights ! Those Europeans are SO way ahead
of us on so many levels.

Thanks Babylon Sister, for your continued posting of FINE articles. I count on you for my daily quota, it is much appreciated :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Remember, remember...
V
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm of two minds on this.
One hemisphere objects to the privacy intrusion, on ordinary people walking around and going about their business, that is posed by constant camera surveillance.

But the other hemisphere has no objection to, and even welcomes, photo-radar for motorists in order to curb their excess of speed. It was working just fine in Ontario until Mike Harris's neocon government got rid of it, claiming it was just a money-grab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It's got to have checks and balances
So those in power can't abuse it for personal, political or unconstitutional gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedleyMisty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I feel the same way
but we should put our flame suits on - a lot of people get really offended when anyone mentions driving safely.

Eh - I think a better solution is more funds for the police department so they can have more officers watching traffic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. If you think politicians are putting these up for safety,
....I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.

Maybe I'm biased because I live under the rule of Chicago's Mayor Daley. He makes no bones about the revenue enhancement piece of these gadgets. A year or two ago, they did a test run on one of our major thoroughfares and racked up hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines in the first months - you could practically see the dollar signs spinning in his eyeballs when they announced the fine amounts (these were stoplight cameras). Subsequent to that, Chicago passed a city ordinance to enter private property to enforce city sticker fines - I think that one, much to Da Mayor's delight, racked up 600k in fines in the first weeks. They have even gone on record to say they want to hire more code enforcement officers - not because there is some outbreak of food poisonings - but because they need the money in fine revenue.

I'm all for municipalities having enough money to run the show but I would rather they did it above board with taxes - not with badges, guns and court appearances. Of course, this is a point to be made to our conservative friends when they bragg about their $300 dollar tax cut they received from bush without realizing federal funding to cities has a direct effect on their daily lives..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. In Savannah, it costs 3000 dollars to run the red light cams at each intersection


The one at Georgetown and Rt 204 wasn't making enough money so they turned them off.

3K before they break even. geesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. As far as I know...
As far as I know, these cameras are in public areas in which no person has any reasonable expectations of privacy.

If the cameras were pointed into the back yard of a private citizen, that's a different story; but as things stand now, I simply can't see a precise and relevant moral difference between a beat-cop working an intersection and a camera doing the exact same thing.

Also, I'm not sure why we decry the use of this by local municipalities to curb crime while at the same time, we rejoice when individuals do the very same thing, then sell the footage to the local news station which will then air it on the Ten O'Clock News for all to see-- to me, that's the real intrusion of privacy.

The camera installed at the intersection just across from my apartment has seems to have reduced traffic accidents-- when once I could expect three to five accidents a week, it's now reduced to a mere handful per month.

Just thinking aloud is all... :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heywood J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. That caused accidents in
Ontario - people jammed on the brakes when they saw the radar sign or the unit itself, and then chained everyone right behind them. That's not working just fine. Red light cameras, however, were a better idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downtown Hound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Jolly good job chaps!
Them bugger cameras need to be destroyed, then maybe those in power will get a clue that maybe not all of us like being under constant watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. In the Netherlands the farmers shoot them. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good. They should do that here in Phoenix.
Of course, a lot of people here are fascists and want MORE cameras.

Go figure. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
16. Adios
panopticon.

K&R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
17. Power to the people! This spying shit has got to stop! They're asking for V for Vendetta...
Though, no doubt TPTB will just install cameras to watch the cameras and cameras to watch the cameras that are watching the cameras... :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
18. If the fires start to go out, they can just throw in some books. Or Dixie Chicks CDs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
19. The surveillance dirigibles will have to be employed now.
These will be much harder to take down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
20. shooting a little left and a tad low
and that in itself is easy to compensate for. other than that it looks good '-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuckessee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. They mainly use petrol filled tyres.
Necklaces for cameras.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
21. little brother fights back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC