Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Abstinence-Only Education: Virtually no support from the public, still receives funding

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 08:56 AM
Original message
Abstinence-Only Education: Virtually no support from the public, still receives funding
For Christian conservatives, the pregnancy, at 16, of Nickelodeon actress Jamie Lynn Spears — the wholesome star of Zoey 101 and younger sister of troubled singer Britney Spears — poses a good news-bad news dilemma.

"We should commend girls like Jamie Lynn Spears for making a courageous decision to have the baby," summed up Bill Maier, vice president of the conservative ministry Focus on the Family. "On the other hand, there's nothing glamorous or fun about being an unwed teen mother."

No one would argue with that sentiment. For teens of lesser means, pregnancy takes away much more than fun and glamour. It greatly reduces chances that the young mother will ever escape poverty.

For all the agreement about the problem, however, a failure to recognize facts appears to be interfering with finding solutions. The Bush administration is sticking adamantly to abstinence-only sex education, which was adopted at the urging of religious conservatives, even as evidence mounts that such programs are failing.

The teen birth rate, which declined 34% from 1991 to 2005, increased 3% in 2006, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It's too soon to say whether this is a blip or a trend, but at the grassroots level, states and school districts appear to be turning away from abstinence-only, presumably because of poor results. The Washington Post reported this month that 14 states had notified the federal government they would no longer be seeking money for abstinence-only programs.

Plenty of studies show that the best approach is a combination of sex education and abstinence counseling. And this year, an eight-year, government-funded study by the non-partisan Mathematica Policy Research Inc. concluded that there was no evidence abstinence-only programs reduced teen sexual activity. Yet the administration is in denial.

Richard Carmona, U.S. Surgeon General from 2002 to 2006, has revealed that he was pressured to emphasize abstinence and ignore facts about sex education. Congress' non-partisan Government Accountability Office has found that most abstinence programs are not reviewed in a scientifically acceptable manner.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20071226/cm_usatoday/insexedabstinenceonlylosessupportbutkeepsfunds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Tax dollars for this, mass murder, and a host of other atrocities: Ain't our "democracy" neat-o?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Ignorance" a delightful christian conservative value
Yes, Mommy I'm still a virgin and I have no idea how I got pregnant. Are we going to church on Wednesday night Mommy? I wanna see the preachers son again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Pseudo "Christians," that is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Roger that
Teammate. I forgot my Quotation Marks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. LOL..sorry, not trying to impose beliefs, but there's big differences in shades of "Christianity"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Roger that
again teammate and a belated welcome to DU. Sadly there are many "shades" of christianity in this country and some of those shades are pretty scary. I tend to beat the "christians" up but I seriously believe "they" are domestic enemies of the constitution while trying to use the constitution as a weapon against their fellow citizens, all in the name of Jesus Christ and often in a tax exempt status. "They" sure are very protective of "their" constitutional liberties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. In this case ignorance is a nice way to say stupid
I'm sorry but it's true - anyone that believes that abstinence only is an idiot. It's been tried through out history and proven that it doesn't work and to pretend that it does is idiotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. A masochistic penchant/offshoot of the authoritarian mindset?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. In my opinion, it is unreasonable to expect teens to refrain from
having sex until they are "ready" for marriage and procreation. I'm not advocating teen sex, but Mother Nature has equipped them for sexual activity long before society has determined that it's proper for them to do so. If you expect them to keep from having babies in their teens, you need to make sure they have the knowledge and the means to prevent unwanted pregnancies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. I recall
that by the time I reached the age of 12 I had gone blind at least three times. And, it was all God's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I seem to recall an old joke about a couple of little boys who
were afraid of of going blind and decided to stop when they needed glasses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formerrepuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. "Abstinence-only" has worked quite well: Abstaining from talking about sex at all- just sweep
a controversial subject under the mat like it doesn't exist, and hopefully the kids won't find out about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Sexuality is a gift from god ... however one chooses to interpret god n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC