Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Recess Appointment Ploy: A Potential for Backfire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:05 PM
Original message
Senate Recess Appointment Ploy: A Potential for Backfire
Like many, when I first heard that Senator Reid had thwarted President Bush's penchant for making controversial recess appointments, I chuckled and said, "Finally. Harry shows a little spine."

But the parliamentarian / Constitutional law scholar in me had deeply-held misgivings, too: "This will provoke an Executive abuse."

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articleii.html">Article II, Section 3 of the United States Constitution reads as follows, in relevant part:

"He <the President> ... may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper ..."

Scenario 1: Bush declares an "extraordinary occasion," and requires both houses to convene.

Scenario 2: Bush declares that the mis-match of agreed-upon adjournment between the houses allows him to "adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper," and then makes his recess appointment.

Thinking forward to a time when control of the houses may be split, Scenario 2 is an especially pernicious possibility.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. adjourn and recess are not the same thing and he cant force them into recess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Recess Is a Lesser Included form...
... of adjournment. See the history of recess appointments:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recess_appointment

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. So DON'T exercise our rights because Bush will circumvent them?
Thank you for your concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I think this is the appropriate answer, because Bush can do MANY terrible things. If we
are to gage every move we make by what the right MIGHT do, we would simply stop in our tracks and always be reactive. That has not been working well at all. (Don't bother to push through legislation he doesn't like because the republicans might filibuster, etc. etc.)

I don't think the sarcasm was called for though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. In Political Physics...
... the reaction is not always equal to the action, unfortunately, especially when dealing with neo-cons.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. With these guys, the push-back is almost always greater than the push.
I don't put anything past them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Me Either n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. No, I'm Not Saying That...
... but I am saying that this has the potential - especially with this Administration and the theory of the Executive held by many key players within it - to bring to a head a Constitutional showdown.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. The only way Bush can adjourn Congress is if both houses fail to agree on when to adjourn
Not a problem in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. If Hastert Were Speaker Right Now...
... he could refuse to reach agreement with Reid, and hand the President the technical Constitutional conditions required.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. IF grasshoppers had six shooters birds would not eat them..
IF is a HUGH!!11! word!!1

(ya know, I almost forgot how to spell huge after freeper talk)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. They Don't Have Opposable Thumbs to Shoot 'Em...
... and there's a big key difference here: divided government happens frequently.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. they don't need opposable thumbs..just trigger fingers..and we all know grasshoppers have fingers!
divided government should be ALWAYS...called checks and balances! or in Great Britain it is called Parliament.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Trigger Toe? (LOL)
As for the substance of your post: the Parliament is premised on partisan control. Explain?

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'm trying hard to understand
exactly what is your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. The Reid Tactic Will Ultimately Backfire...
... in all likelihood. Every time this tactic is used, the "strong Executive" proponents in the EOP see red, and retriple their efforts to find a "perfectly legal" way to push back.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. so, Reid shouldn't have even bothered
to rein in Bush's abuse of this loophole?

I'm still trying to grasp your point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Just Warning of the Pushback...
... that's all.

- Dave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CorpGovActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC