Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

O.J. Simpson must pay past but not future royalties to Goldmans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Doondoo Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 07:15 PM
Original message
O.J. Simpson must pay past but not future royalties to Goldmans
SANTA MONICA – A judge ordered Tuesday that royalties or other earnings due O.J. Simpson from his past work in movies, TV shows and commercials be paid directly to the family of murder victim Ron Goldman, but rejected a bid by Goldman's family to collect on Simpson's future earnings. Lawyers for both sides portrayed the decision by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Gerald Rosenberg as a victory.

Simpson attorney Yale Galanter said it was key that the Goldman family failed to win the right to any of Simpson's future earnings, adding that royalties he receives from past work in such films as the “Naked Gun” movies and the TV show “1st and Ten” amount to almost nothing.

“Last year Simpson's royalty checks from all of his movies were less than 39 cents,” Galanter said.

“They got kicked to the curb again,” he added. “Every door they're banging on gets slammed.”



http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20070220-1103-ca-simpson-lawsuit.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like OJ has found a lawyer who's...
Edited on Tue Feb-20-07 07:23 PM by Kutjara
...every bit as slimy as he is. It's sickening to see this Galanter clown crowing about how the Goldman's are being screwed out of damages awarded to them years ago for the death of their son. It's one thing to fight for your client, quite another to be publicly triumphant about a murderer getting away with his crime. I thought lawyers were supposed to be, first and foremost, officers of the court.

As for the court deciding that the damages are only payable from past earnings, well, I wonder how many sacks of cash the judge will be taking home for that little decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. The whole thing is a great tragedy from top to bottom.
Nothing good has ever come from any of that evil shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC