Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conyers "Disappointed" Mukasey Didn't Appoint Special Counsel for Tapes Probe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:54 PM
Original message
Conyers "Disappointed" Mukasey Didn't Appoint Special Counsel for Tapes Probe
Conyers "Disappointed" Mukasey Didn't Appoint Special Counsel for Tapes Probe
By Paul Kiel - January 2, 2008, 5:13PM

A statement just out from House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) hits on Mukasey's decision not to tap Durham as a special counsel:

While I certainly agree that these matters warrant an immediate criminal investigation, it is disappointing that the Attorney General has stepped outside the Justice Department’s own regulations and declined to appoint a more independent special counsel in this matter. Because of this action, the Congress and the American people will be denied – as they were in the Valerie Plame matter – any final report on the investigation.

Equally disappointing is the limited scope of this investigation, which appears limited to the destruction of two tapes. The government needs to scrutinize what other evidence may have been destroyed beyond the two tapes, as well as the underlying allegations of misconduct associated with the interrogations.

The Justice Department’s record over the past seven years of sweeping the administration’s misconduct under the rug has left the American public with little confidence in the Administration’s ability to investigate itself. Nothing less than a special counsel with a full investigative mandate will meet the tests of independence, transparency and completeness. Appointment of a special counsel will allow our nation to begin to restore our credibility and moral standing on these issues.

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/005008.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. At some point I'm going to stop caring about the emotional life
of Congressional committee chairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hold on. NOT? I thought Yes?
I am now completely confused. COMPLETELY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. has conyers started impeachment proceeding yet? no.... pot meet kettle n/t
its all a charade by the single party state...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. ok john here is what you should do-- call your leader and tell her
to get off her ass and start doing her job. nancy and crew need to put the screws to these guys and never stop turning them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wow. A Strongly Worded Statement. That'll do it.
Mukasey is quaking in his boots now.... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm disappointed that our party isn't all over the tv clamoring for a special counsel
The republicans damn sure would be. Where is the opposition?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes, and there should be an independent prosecuter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh hell, it doesn't matter anyway.
The best we can expect if a few minor CIA employess being convicted of something.

There is not one single chance in hell it would ever go any higher, no matter who is prosecuting it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC