Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Think Again: No Iraq News (Still) Isn't Good News

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 04:59 PM
Original message
Think Again: No Iraq News (Still) Isn't Good News
Think Again: No Iraq News (Still) Isn't Good News:

The decline in emphasis on violence in Iraq doesn’t square with the events on the ground. The number of Iraqi civilians killed increased from the year before to 16,232, up from 12,371. But reporting on the lives of ordinary Iraqis accounted for only 5 percent of the 2007 “newshole.”

Last year was also the deadliest year for U.S. troops in Iraq since the invasion, with 899 killed. The military attributes this increase directly to the surge that was heavily covered by the media in the beginning of the year. Yet the same newspapers that wrote about the surge over 1,300 times in January mentioned it only 410 times in December. Why not cover the results of this strategy with as much vigor?

One journalist polled in the survey offers the following explanation: boredom. “The greatest tragedy of the war has been how the media has in some way bored its audience with the violence.”

But is the public really “bored” with accounts of violence in Iraq? That’s unknown, and perhaps unknowable, since news organizations are so reluctant to invest in the coverage to prove it one way or another. As my Media Matters colleague Eric Boehlert noted, ABC News’s “Nightline” recently ignored Iraq every night for 18 straight weeks, while it found the time to report on such crucial stories as twin skateboarding stars, “Frenemies,” Couchsurfing.com, and pole dancing as exercise, just to pick four.


Declaring Victory:

The weird thing about the surge is that it's failure has been much more unambiguous. The theory behind the surge was clear. Some people said more troops would bring more security to Iraq. Critics of that idea noted that sending more troops would be logistically unsustainable. Surge theorists posited that a temporary increase in force levels would create a temporary increase in security that would open window of opportunity for political reconciliation that would allow for a permanent increase in security. So the surge was implemented. As of September, the surge had failed to generate the political reconciliation that would allow for a permanent increase in security. Surge supporters told skeptics we had to give it more time. Three months later, the surge has still failed to generate the political reconciliation that would allow for a permanent increase in security.


Further key features of the 2007 civilian death toll:

  • The most violent 12-month period in Iraq’s recent history extended from July 2006 to June 2007, with 29,625 to 31,852 civilian deaths recorded.
  • Trends from mid-2007 onwards show monthly violence levels on the decrease.
  • Since March 2007 every month has seen more civilian deaths outside Baghdad than inside it. This has never happened before.
  • Per-capita,3 the five most violent governorates in Iraq during 2007 were:
  1. Diyala, at 255 violent civilian deaths per 100,000 inhabitants (up 29% from 197/100k in 2006)
  2. Baghdad, at 164/100k (down 39% from 267/100k)
  3. Anbar, at 122/100k (up 61% from 76/100k) 4
  4. Salah al-Din, at 120/100k (up 26% from 95/100k)
  5. Ninewa, at 100/100k (up 143% from 41/100k)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. BAGHDAD (AFP) - Three US soldiers have been killed in Iraq,
Forum Name Latest Breaking News
Topic subject Three US soldiers killed in Iraq
Topic URL http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3123475#3123475
3123475, Three US soldiers killed in Iraq
Posted by Barrett808 on Thu Jan-03-08 02:04 PM

Source: AFP

BAGHDAD (AFP) - Three US soldiers have been killed in Iraq, the US military announced on Thursday, making them the first American casualties of the new year.

A military statement said two soldiers were killed in a small-arms fire attack while conducting operations in Diyala province on Thursday. Another soldier was wounded.

A separate statement said another soldier was killed when his foot patrol was struck by a roadside bomb south of Baghdad on Wednesday.

The latest deaths bring the total number of American soldiers killed since the 2003 US-led invasion to 3,905, according to an AFP tally based on Pentagon figures.




Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080103/wl_mideast_afp/iraqustoll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Republicans are inherently short-sighted.
They have been screeching about the three-month lull in the violence as if it was VE Day and the bad guys had surrendered.

Sadly, as a combat vet, I know their celebration is premature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC