MSNBC: Secondary headline from Iowa tonight...

[Subdivisions]

"Massive Democratic turnout, in a red state, to vote for change."

- Tim Russert

[aquart]

1. WHAT red state?

[Alexander]

9. Iowa went for Bush in 2004.

It shouldn't really be called red, since it went for Gore in 2000. More like "purple".

[Arugula Latte]

2. Oh, poor Lil' "Bush lapel pin" Timmy must have choked on that one!

:toast:

[C_U_L8R]

3. That's what revolution looks like

democratic revolution

go blue team !!!!

[Stinky The Clown]

4. Uh ...... Iowa's a blue state ..... maybe purple.

[Subdivisions]

6. That's what he said..."RED state" n/t

[Stinky The Clown]

12. Fat Timmah Potatohead is a Gashole

[bobbolink]

7. Not from what I saw of the total Dem numbers tonight, vs the total Rep numbers.

Did you see them?

MUCH MORE turnout of RW. :cry:

[supernova]

5. Dem turnout nearly double that of repubs

According to BBC America News at 10pm.

[harun]

8. On CSPAN a number of the people interviewed said

the turnout in their precinct was about 50% more than they expected with many people changing parties.

First one would think it was rethugs trying to make mischief but I don't think so. I think it is because the rethug party is in such a bad state that these people want to be Dem's and work for change.

[rodeodance]

10. timmy is deluded

[rogue emissary]

11. Did Bush win Iowa in '04?