Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michael Moore wins another round in libel case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:15 PM
Original message
Michael Moore wins another round in libel case
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mikeinthenews/index.php?id=9239

February 21st, 2007 12:06 am
Michael Moore wins another round in libel case

By John Flesher / Associated Press

TRAVERSE CITY -- Filmmaker Michael Moore won another round Tuesday in a court battle with the brother of Oklahoma City bombing conspirator Terry Nichols.

The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Ohio sided with a Michigan-based federal judge who in 2005 threw out James Nichols’ suit accusing Moore of libeling and defaming him in the Oscar-winning movie, “Bowling for Columbine.”

Nichols, a Sanilac County soybean farmer, contended statements in the 2002 film could lead viewers to believe he was involved in the bombing. He also claimed the film invaded his privacy and inflicted emotional distress.

But a three-judge panel ruled unanimously that District Judge Paul D. Borman acted properly in rejecting the lawsuit. Borman found that Moore’s statements about Nichols were “factual and substantially true.”

Nichols “has not presented any evidence indicating that Michael Moore intended to falsely implicate James Nichols in the Oklahoma City bombing,” the appeals panel said.

Moore’s attorney, Herschel Fink, said it was gratifying that two federal courts had turned away challenges to the accuracy of the film, a withering commentary on guns and violence in America that won the Academy Award for best documentary.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. heh
a lawyer named "Fink"?

:rofl:

Sorry BS, sometimes the juvenile in me is itching to burst out :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Geeze. Who was the "Sugardaddy" who bankrolled the losing lawsuit??? boo. hoo.
Was it George Soros? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC