Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, what exactly is the definition of "electable?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:25 AM
Original message
So, what exactly is the definition of "electable?"
This is a buzzword that is tossed around so much on the airwaves lately that I think the definition of it needs to be clarified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's a word the M$M uses to suppress any support for Dennis Kucinich and his platform for holding
THEM accountable.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Probably could be broken down to this:
1) Photo/telegenic
2) Strong speaker / public persona
3) Nondescript policies likely to offend no one

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenvpi Donating Member (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. It means old white man(ntxt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Thank you. . .
I'm getting real sick and tired of listening to that endless crap about "ONLY" old white males being eligible for election to the Presidency. For this country's entire history, our highest offices have been held by people representing less than 35% of the country's population. Yet we are constantly being told that we MUST continue putting THEM into office because THEY won't vote for anyone else. Well, fu*k that.

I've actually run across people who have claimed that we MUST elect a white male for the presidency because HE will "think of everyone" where a woman or a person of color will pander to their own race. Of course, the moron who said that (and yep, he's a white male) apparently can't put together any knowledge of the history of his own country. Like most con-artist con-servatives, he talks a great game of patriotism, yet doesn't know squat about the tyranny of the minority.

It's time this country get off the toilet and face a stark reality. Either we believe in our Constitution or we don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jemmons Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Its shorthand for "someone that we [the media] will let you know about
and possible vote for".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. the corporate media means "someone our owners refuse to vet"
Campaign X means "candidate Y"

Campaign Y means "candidate Z"

Campaign Z means "Candidate X"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. I know one thing. I doesn't equal either Huckabee or Romney.
:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. Electable means agreeing to keep the powers that be happy & wealthy...
ie. M$M, Big Pharma, Wall Street, Energy Co's

:grr:

I like Swamp Rats definition!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. Teeth. It's all about the teeth.

Good teeth are the key to electability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. No, you've got to be very tall and have great hair.
Ideally, the hair will turn the right shade of silver as it ages.

Listen to the wisdom of Scott Adams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. George W. Bush sets the bar for electability.
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 04:19 AM by backscatter712
Even a psychopathic, narcissistic twit with a chimp-like face, addiction issues and a room temperature IQ (in Celsius) can be "electable" if he has the right asshats with money and power pulling all the strings for him.

Face it. Kucinich, even with his quirks, runs circles around Bush. Yet Kucinich is considered "unelectable" while Bush gets the hot seat in the Oval Office.

What does this tell you about who's "electable"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. Someone that Joe Six-Pack could plausibly vote for
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 04:05 AM by Naturyl
Joe knows little or nothing about politics or the issues beyond a few things he's picked up from TV. Joe doesn't feel strongly about anything in particular except himself and his own family. Joe is not a progressive, an evangelical, a Green, or anything else. He is just a "regular guy," and he wants somebody who looks and sounds pretty much "normal" and who says the particular things he wants to hear (generally the things his family taught him were "right"). He's a moderate Dem, a moderate Puke, or an independent. Sometimes he skips elections.

EDIT: It also has to be someone Joe could "have a beer with." Such a candidate must able to exchange lowbrow jokes with Joe, relate to his his work-a-day life credibly, and not ruin it with too much boring "smart stuff." This is VERY IMPORTANT. Anti-intellectualism is HUGH in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. I agree. . .
But I would just...for ONCE...like to see this MSM explain that Joe SixPack is a MINORITY in this country, and that we must pander to that minority in order to elect a President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Joe 6 is a minority?
I'm pretty sure that is contradicted by the nature of statistics. The "average" individual is always in the majority, by default. Otherwise, he would not be average.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Joe = generally a MALE name. . .
that would constitute a minority in this country right away. Someone who Joe could have a "beer with" is another subset of that minority. Then, by the time you start subtracting the number of "average" men who know little or nothing about current events, etc., that minority status becomes even more pronounced. Joe is also an Anglo/white name. What image do people have when they visualize the "average Joe Sixpack?" A Hispanic or African-American? An Asian? A woman? A member of the GLBT community?

It seems to me that those "average Joe" cliches are used to subtly perpetrate the claim that the minority which dominates our corporations and our government continues to be the minority which must be pandered to. It makes sense that it comes from a media overly dominated by representatives from that same minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
12. It's the tallest one
that gets elected so that makes that person "electable" :think: :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Nah, Kerry was taller than Shrubby
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 04:28 AM by Naturyl
It's the "have a beer" factor. Anti-intellectualism.

Kerry, of course, was the worst possible choice on this score. The man is cerebral, nuanced, and rational. Horrors!

EDIT: Bill Clinton was a genius too, but he was politcally savvy enough to make sure it was WELL hidden. The beer factor, Big Macs, and the saxophone. Those things are what made the Big Dog "electable."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
14. The term is irrelavent.
People need to vote their conscience, therefore, electability should never be a consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
15. "Able to beat the Republican hack."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. this year it means a candidate who can bring
lots and lots of new voters in which will make it impossible for the pukes to steal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Both Edwards and Obama could do that.
Hillary? Meh... not so sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. I agree. Both JE and BO could bring in large numbers
of indies- though I don't think JE has the pull with younger voters BO has. Hillary? Just can't do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
23. If we knew, everybody would be doing it.
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 07:57 AM by rucky
I think it means likeable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC