Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If obama keeps doing so well and the nom is given to HRC because of super delegates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:44 PM
Original message
If obama keeps doing so well and the nom is given to HRC because of super delegates
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 03:45 PM by Windy
those delegates who throw their support to HRC despite the popular opinion of the nation and those they represent should be on the chopping block on their next bit for re-election!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RedCappedBandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pardon my noobishness,
but can somebody please explain to me WTF a super delegate is, and why their votes are more important than mine or anybody elses here on DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I could use a remedial Super Delegate course as well......n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Sinister Donating Member (503 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Every dem Gov, plus...
DEm Senators and reps, party chairs, former pres and veeps, plus a few more I can't remember. THATS why the're votes are important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. superdelegate info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCappedBandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Thank you
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. It'd be like 2000 all over again.
But I doubt it'll happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. If that happens, I'm done with the Party
and then they can do whatever the hell they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. The most superdelegates in 2004? Howard Dean. After Iowa, they all started to
move to Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. what if it's given to Obama or Edwards because of superdelegates?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. If Obama continues to lead in the electorate, the superdelegates should give their votes accordingly
They should reflect their constituency!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. The 'no insurgency clause' of the DNC primary rules
put into place to prevent another McGovern or Jackson from getting nominated by popular vote, will have worked as planned.

Have I ever mentioned that we are screwn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. those 'superdelegates' will ultimately be for the one who can win in Nov
and bring new people into the party. They have their interests at stake. If Hillary demonstrates in the primaries that she can't win and Obama is winning and bringing new people in, do you honestly think that elected officials will make sure and nominate Hillary? they already know she has a problem expanding her base because her negative ratings are so high. No, they will go with whoever demonstrates they can win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. The majority are elected officials
They'd have a tough time voting for someone their constituents rejected, whether Clinton or anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. of course which is why if Hillary doesn't show she can win they won't stay with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. They are fickle and some of the 160 for HRC or so will come over to
to Obama later on.

He will win the majority of super-delegates in the end. In the ned it won;t matter, it;s an obvious Obama landslide and Hil's 2 big states MI and FL will NOT have their state delegates counted at all!

So Obama will be nominated on the first ballot and as soon as he goes over the Hillary and Edwards voting ceases and everyone unites behind him, voting for him.

Don't worry about the super-delegates, Hil won't hardly have any in the end, and she only got 160 of 800 or so in the first place!

What a loser she is. Now she's crying like Muskie because she lost.

NOT Presidential!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. Right now the popular opinion of the nation favors HRC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Right now HRC is tanking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. why don't we wait until after Feb 5th to worry about this stuff.
Hillary up, hillary down, hillary up, hillary down.

Now it is Obama's turn.


Obama has a TWO delegate lead among regular delegates over HRC and JE. Not a lot of data points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-07-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. internally inconsistent t premise
Edited on Mon Jan-07-08 04:29 PM by onenote
If Obama keeps doing so well, HRC won't be able to get the nomination because she won't be getting the superdelegates.

There are slighly fewer than 800 superdelegates. Getting the nomination requires a bit more than 2000 delegates, so its entirely possible to win the nomination outright even if you don't get any of the superdelegates. Admittedly, that is unlikely. But what is likely -- indeed virtually certain -- is that the candidate that is doing best in the primaries is going to be picking up the lion's share of the uncommitted superdelegates. At the time of the Iowa caucus, nearly 70 percent of the superdelegates had not yet committed to a particular candidate. Of the roughly thirty percent that had committed, 160 had come out for HRC, 59 for Obama, and 32 for Edwards. Those commmitments are subject to change.

So, accepting the premise of the OP: that Obama keeps doing so well -- it is exceedingly unlikely (and, indeed, all but certain) that most of the superdelegates will go with Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC