Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Peace with "honor": Dick Cheney channels Dick Nixon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
scoopmeister Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:18 PM
Original message
Peace with "honor": Dick Cheney channels Dick Nixon

http://www.attytood.com/2007/02/peace_with_honor_cheney_channe.html

Cheney:

"And I want you to know that the American people will not support a policy of retreat," he added. "We want to complete the mission, we want to get it done right, and we want to return with honor," said Cheney, who heads on Thursday for Australia to meet Prime Minister John Howard, another backer of Bush's Iraq policy.

If that reminds you of Nixon's "peace with honor" pledge from 1968, it should, and you should be very alarmed:

1) When Nixon gave that speech at the GOP convention, it had been 1,467 since the alleged incident in the Gulf of Tonkin that triggered the American escalation of the war. When he finally achieved his "peace with honor," it was another 1,633 days later, so more than half the fighting came after the "peace with honor" promise.

2) More importantly, from the start of 1969 through the end of the war, some 20,604 American soldiers died in pursuit of "peace with honor," more than one-third of the total (58,202) for the entire war.

3) In the end, "peace with honor" didn't look all that different than "peace" -- i.e., if Nixon had merely brought the troops home on Jan. 20, 1969. As we all know, Saigon still fell, in May of 1975.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why is Cheney using a word...
...he doesn't know the meaning of? To him "honor" is the antonym of "off her."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Get it done right? You're not even sending body armor to the troops and
you're cutting VA funding. Dick, maybe you can get John Howard to send another 20,000 Australians to die in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. The MIC (Military-Industrial-Complex) corporations stood to profit...
for more than 6 years after the Republic Party's crook said that.

Today, Big Oil wants to steal 3 barrels out of 4 for as long as there will be any black gold in Iraq (and in Iran next).

And the Constitution is (almost) dead.

Distressing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. "we want to return with honor"???
Where the hell they going to get it? They didn't go in with it, so they'll have to steal that, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. I said this when the Iraq war started We would leave in helicoptors
We will leave quickly like Vietnam

Another American travesty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. "If Nixon had merely brought the troops home on Jan. 20, 1969" ...
... I wouldn't have had time to get the 'flavor' of the country. A little over two weeks would have just been a junket.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. We have decimated and annihilated a country with no regard for their traditions.
We have discredited ourselves through heinous torture of other human beings. There is no honor in that.

It is embarrassment. Wars are not an effect way in this still new millennium.

We can change and rectify this as best we can. With our hearts and minds.

Have a nice whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC