Is Wikipedia too Anti-Christian and Anti-American for you? You need CONSERVAPEDIA!!!

[Little Wing]

And to prove what a curious bunch the conservatives are, here's the top ten viewed pages

Most viewed pages

1. Main Page‎ <17,011>
2. Index‎ <3,346>
3. Examples of Bias in Wikipedia‎ <2,740>
4. Debate topics‎ <1,797>
5. User: DeborahB.‎ <1,694>
6. Is the theory of macroevolution true?‎ <1,183>
7. The Theory of Evolution‎ <1,181>
8. Talk: Examples of Bias in Wikipedia‎ <953>
9. User talk:Aschlafly‎ <911>
10. The Conservapedia Commandments‎ <873>

http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page

Enjoy.

[WindRavenX]

1. haha losers

:rofl:

[walldude]

2. LOL.. I guess the conservatives are too stupid to realize

that Wikipedia can be edited by the public at large. I guess to quote Colbert "reality has a liberal bias." Bwhahahahaha

[greenbriar]

5. so can conservapedia be edited??

might be fun ;)

[walldude]

8. Don't know, I know anyone can edit Wikipedia

you'd think the idiots would have figured it out by now.

[TheBaldyMan]

31. Dang - you have to log in to edit content

The only problem is content, even if you post rubbish it blends right in with the rest of the site. The only way to sabotage it would be to correct the entries to established truth, although rightly that doesn't count as sabotage.

How crazy is that?

I was going to post that George Washington's collection of 'My Little Pony' figureines were now housed in the GWMLP museum in Poughkeepsie, NY. Still compared to he rest of the content not that far fetched and just as rooted in fact.

I feel in my gut that it should be true ... therefore it is unassailiably true.

[Little Wing]

3. Oh,. and the ancient history section you asked? Creation to 500 AD of course

:eyes:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Index

[wtmusic]

4. When truth is inconvenient

it's time to invent our own!

[Fenris]

6. "Did you faith is a uniquely Christian concept?"

No I did not. But that's probably because that's a lie.

[Richard Steele]

7. HeadInSandapedia. Brilliant!

[wtmusic]

9. Created by 58 homeschoolers

who felt it necessary to share their inbred ideas with the rest of the world :eyes:

[Quixote1818]

37. Since 2006 that page has only been accessed 594 times

This site is not exactly tearing up the internet by getting tons of viewers.

[greenbriar]

10. check out this page...

http://www.conservapedia.com/Abortion

[longship]

22. Ooops! It's dead, Jim!

Just tried to get in to Conservapedia. "Connection refused"

Maybe they are blocking DUer connections. Or, maybe they just don't know what the fuck they are doing.

I want to read the biblical computer technology sections of the Conservapedia. Can't wait.

If they come back, that is...

On edit: They're back. Obviously a glitch in their Matrix...

[JDPriestly]

11. If you don't like the truth, make up something better

[muntrv]

12. You will much prefer using Conservapedia compared to Wikipedia

if you want concise answers free of "political correctness." Is that what you call facts? Political correctness?

[Bill McBlueState]

28. yeah, I saw that.

Conservapedia appears to be free of most kinds of correctness, not just political.

[Cabcere]

49. As someone wise once said,

"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." ;)

[baldguy]

13. Check it:

http://www.conservapedia.com/George_W._Bush

Let's all sign up and "fix" it.

[TransitJohn]

19. LOL

Is the president of the United States of America. Was elected in 2000, and then re-elected in 2004.

Some of his successes are: Defeating Saddam Hussein. Prevented any further terrorist attacks on US soil (since September 2001). Cut taxes.

That's soooooo funny.....what, ya can't think of anything else?....Anything?.....Bueller? And those are all questionable.

[TheBaldyMan]

35. you want funny hit the 'history' tab and compare previous edits.

Is the president of the United States of America. Was selected in 2000, and then elected in 2004. + Is part of the blue man group...he's the one on the far left...
- +
- Some of his successes are: +
- Defeating Saddam Hussein. +
- Prevented any further terrorist attacks on US soil (since September 2001). +
- Cut taxes. +
- +
- Some of his failures are: +
- Allowing 9/11 to happen. +
- Complete lack of response for Hurricane Katrina. +
- Not catching Osama bin Laden. +
- Creating a massive deficit. +
- Caught in massive lies about the Iraq war. +
- Appointing ridiculous cabinet members

[StrictlyRockers]

14. Cool! Wikipedia for Idiots! Call it... "Wackypedia"

Oh. I kind of like that.

[Yukari Yakumo]

34. Too late.

There's already the Uncyclopedia: http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

[Quixote1818]

15. OMFG! Here is what they say about Deism and the founding fathers

They have all the founding fathers turning from Deism to Christianity on their death beads.




Snip>

At the Constitutional Convention less than three years from his death, however, Benjamin Franklin proposed prayers in a way indicative of his no longer being a deist.

Another Founding Father described as a deist was Thomas Jefferson , but he increasingly embraced Christianity as he grew older and was never a deist. Jefferson personally struggled with the divinity of Christ and produced an edited version of the Gospels, later known as the Jefferson Bible, which contained only the moral and ethical teachings of Jesus and omitted third-person accounts of his life, particularly the accounts of the miracles.

Ten years from his death Jefferson described himself as "a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus, very different from the Platonists, who call me infidel, and themselves Christians and preachers of the gospel, while they draw all their characteristic dogmas from what its Author never said nor saw."<5>

The closer Jefferson approached his death, the more Christian he appeared. He read the Bible daily as the end grew near. His grandson described Jefferson as follows:<6>

He was regular in his attendance church, taking his prayer book with him. He drew the plan of the Episcopal church in Charlottesville, was one of the largest contributors to its erection, and contributed regularly to the support of its minister. I paid, after his death, his subscription of $200 to the erection of the Presbyterian church in the same village. A gentleman of some distinction calling on him and expressing his disbelief in the truths of the Bible, his reply was, 'Then, sir, you have studied it to little purpose.'"

[Proud2BAmurkin]

16. LOL! This is hugh I'm series. Is there an entry for "morans"?

:rofl:

[951-Riverside]

17. "You have to log in to edit pages."

:rofl:

[longship]

18. Oooooo!!! I can hardly wait to read "Consevapedia Commandments"

That's a real loaded one, I'll bet.

Let's see...

Ooooo! I *love* number four:

When referencing dates based on the approximate birth of Jesus, give appropriate credit for the basis of the date (B.C. or A.D.). "BCE" and "CE" are unacceptable substitutes because they deny the historical basis. See CE.

Historic basis? That's precisely why historians have changed to the more accurate CE and BCE. Jesus was *not* born in year "zero". So, BC is historically *inaccurate*.

Jesus! Indeed. What a bunch of macaroons!?

[HuffleClaw]

20. SERIOUSLY ?????

please tell me this a joke.

[longship]

21. For a good chuckle, read the History Lectures

Actually, it's pretty fucking scary what these folks consider history.
Can you imagine if they got a hold of our edumacation system?

[0rganism]

27. imagine? who's imagining?

During the 70s and early 80s, while many of us were guzzling beers and rocking out to the zep, these guys were drawing up plans for taking over the local school boards, tweaking curriculae to reintroduce their views whereever possible, and defunding public schools when manipulating course contents failed. And for the last 25 years, they've been carrying out those plans with some success.

[GreenZoneLT]

23. Well, reality DOES have a well-known liberal bias

Finally, a conservative challenge to empirical facts. About damn time.

[AlCzervik]

24. wow now they can site a source for their made up facts.

Paris business review anyone?

http://www.parisbusinessreview.net/

http://www.parisbusinessreview.com/

[Phredicles]

25. Do they have an entry for Jeff Gannon?

[longship]

26. Can you imagine the fun a person could have with that site?

I would love to post some entries which would take the site to the extreme just to see how long it would take before a moderator recognized that I wasn't a friend.

"George W. Bush -- Picked by God?"
"Masterbation -- the truth about self-abuse"

Or, like Landover Baptist...
"Tampons -- Satan's cotton fingers"

There are so many possibilities.

[cool user name]

43. "Tampons --- Satan's cotton fingers"

:rofl:

[orleans]

29. oh god! something to help make people more ignorant than they already are.

argh!

[unpossibles]

30. you HAVE to check out the discussion topics

such as: Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?
http://www.conservapedia.com/Should_Creationism/Intelligent_design_be_taught_as_a_scientific_alternative_to_evolution_in_public_schools%3F

no...

1. Creationism is not scientific, and should only be studied in religious studies if we are to follow the Constitution.

2. If we're forced to teach alternative beliefs as ID and Creationism in science classes, the so-called Pastafarians would have the same right to teach their Flying Spaghetti Monster belief.

Our numerals are called Arabic numerals. Astronomy has a large ongoing list of Arabic names. They all stem from the time period spanning 800-1100 when Arabic culture where the center of the development of knowledge. However, in the 1100s, an Iman declared that mathematics is evil. Since then the Arabic intellectual culture has never recovered, only a couple of scientific Nobel prizes have been won by Arabs, compared to the much smaller ethnic group of Jews.

Does it really do any good if American children learn to dismiss natural science? Do we really want to fall behind Europe and the rest of the world?

REPLY
Creationism is not scientific? This is absolute nonsense. This is what evolutionists like to think, but it is the farthest thing from the truth. What can evolutionists bring up about creationism that is non-scientific? Also, what do you mean when you say that " should only be studied in religious studies if we are to follow the Constitution."? Where exactly does the Constitution deny this right? PhilipB 21:01, 28 December 2006 (EST)

wow. It's good to see some dissent on there, but... I doubt anyone will learn anything from it.

other topics:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate_topics
Crusades... Good or Bad?
Is the theory of macroevolution true?
Is democracy even possible in Iraq?Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or communism?
Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?
Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?
Were the Puritans right to banish (expel) people for religious reasons?

[TheBaldyMan]

32. *snigger* they are frantically excising MountainDew's entries

Unfortunately I didn;'t get to the 'Tentacle rape' entry (information removed) and I would have loved to have seen the alteration for George W. Bush (reverting to previous version by Aschlafly)

What a bunch of kooks.

on edit : another screamer
Deletion log); 01:03 . . Aschlafly (Talk | contribs) (deleted "Sex": content was: 'The physical process by which new offspring are created. In humans and other mammals the male inserts his penis into the females vagina. The first p...' (and the only contributor was '<[Special:Contributions/Jabberwocky|J)[br />
:dilemma:

another excellent edit from Corservarepublican when editing the entry for God:redirecting to Allah

:rofl:

[ZombieNixon]

Someone seems to have edited it to deflate them a little:

From "examples of bias in Wikipedia":
28. In breton "wiki" means liberal, and "pedia" means bias. The founders of wikipedia were celtic. :D

[FVZA_Colonel]

33. Wikipedia itself has serious credibility problems.

I'd hate to see the result of someone actually use that site as a "source."

[cool user name]

44. Do you have a source for that, FVZA?

I have a source that says that Wikipedia is actually fairly reliable.

Internet encyclopaedias go head to head

Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds.

(snip)

The exercise revealed numerous errors in both encyclopaedias, but among 42 entries tested, the difference in accuracy was not particularly great: the average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica, about three.



More here:

http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051212/full/438900a.html

[Yukari Yakumo]

36. It is a hoot...

Their sad, yet not surprising entry on Islam:

Islam

Islam is a religion of Abraham that has grown to be the second largest religion with over 1.4 billion followers. The word "Islam" means submission to God. The followers of Islam are called Muslims. Muslims practice complete monotheism, worshiping Allah and believing Muhammad to be his last and greatest prophet. They live by the Koran, the pure and holy word of Allah that must be treated with the utmost respect. Muslims wash their hands before reading the book, which is considered complete and perfect only in the original Arabic, and burn old copies instead of throwing them away. Muslims follow the five pillars of Islam, which are straightforward and easy to understand. The belief in one god is clear, and encourages familiarity. Five daily prayers are recited facing toward Mecca with specific movements and times. Giving to the poor keeps them from becoming greedy or putting too much stake in worldly possessions. A month of fasting brings them closer to Allah. A pilgrimage to Mecca shows respect for the prophet Muhammad and his journey. Intoxication, gambling, stealing, adultery, and false accusations of adultery along with other offenses, are forbidden and highly punishable. Because Islam is an uncomplicated religion to live by, it is sure to continue in its popularity around the world.


The Five Pillars of Islam are:

1. To have submit to the one god, Allah, whose prophet was Muhammad.

2. Pray to Allah five times each day while facing Mecca.

3. Fast during daylight hours for the entire month of Ramadan. No food is eaten in that month during daylight hours. Fasting strengthens the body and soul.

4. Almsgiving: this means Muslims must donate to the poor.

5. A Muslim must take a Hajj or pilgrimage at least once during his lifetime to Mecca where Muhammad himself made a hajj from A.D. 629 to 632.


Islam and Paganism

Although most Muslims profess belief in a single, almighty God, a substantial minority of accredited Western scholars believe that the Muslim belief system can be traced back to distinctly polytheistic antecedents. Some, for example, have attempted to to link Allah to a moon deity. <1> Others have pointed to the pagan roots of various Muslim prohibitions, such as the ban on pork originating in the 3rd-century AD Damascene cult of the pig-god Jamal. <2> There is some evidence that traditional Muslim scholars have been suppressing this information as well as various recently-recovered scrolls that hint at early Muslim human sacrifice (e.g., at Uhud). <3>

Wasn't the last paragraph thoroughly debunked many times already?

[Warren DeMontague]

38. It's not just wikipedia. It's REALITY. It stubbornly refuses to go along with the Bible's account.

WE say the Earth must be 6,000 years old!

Someone just forgot to tell the Earth.



....waaaaah. Call the fuckin' Waaaah-mbulance for these pinheads.

[LeftishBrit]

39. Here is their entry on George W. Bush in its entirety

George W. Bush
From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Is the president of the United States of America. Was elected controversially in 2000, and re-elected in 2004.

Some of his successes are:

Invading Iraq before Saddam Hussein could use his weapons of mass destruction on more innocents, like he did against the Kurds.
Executing Saddam Hussein for War Crimes.
Preventing terrorist attacks on US soil since September 2001.
Cutting taxes.
Balancing the budget by 2012.
Causing more American deaths than 9/11.
Being re-elected when running against liberal extremist John Kerry.
Retrieved from "http://www.conservapedia.com/George_W._Bush"



Looks as though someone naughty edited it to insert the sentence about causing American deaths. The rest is pure right-wing fantasy: 'weapons of mass destruction'; 'preventing terrorist attacks on US soil since September 2001'; 'liberal extremist John Kerry'!

[cool user name]

45. Balancing the budget by 2012?

:wtf:

Crediting him with future events that haven't taken place? LOL

That's more like homeschoolededia. :rofl:

[wtmusic]

51. Clinton did it (and then some) in 7 years

but he didn't have any of that pain-in-the-ass imperialism to deal with

[Ioo]

40. Wow you should see the made up shit about George Washington

http://www.conservapedia.com/George_Washington

[cool user name]

48. That site is horribly slow ... n/t

[matcom]

41. is it down?

i'm getting DNS errors :shrug:

[Little Wing]

42. kick for the true way

[tom_paine]

46. These people sure are dead-set on behaving like Nazis and Soviets

and they don't care who knows it.

Upset that reality has a liberal bias? Come on down to Orwell-land, where war is always peace, slavery always freedom, and The Leader is always Right.

:puke: :puke: :puke:

[Redstone]

47. 17,000 total views, and only 3300 went on to read the index? Piss-poor performance,

right there. 14,000 people went to the main page, and were not interested enough to go to any other pages...three times as many as those who DID go on.

What a spectacualr failure of a website.

Redstone

[mitchum]

50. And it's the unerring word of Gawwwwd!