How come no one is talking about Rezko?

[BooScout]

And how come the first I heard about him is on a link from another website about 5 minutes ago? How did I miss this?

[thunder rising]

1. Because it's not an issue

Sorry did you just wake up or something? Rezko was debunked months ago.

[BooScout]

4. No but I am not in the States.......

...and I don't visit DU on a daily basis...or for that matter watch American News except in small doses when I stay up late enough to catch it on satelite....& I visit here in spurts. I honestly had never heard of this guy until tonight.

[sunonmars]

6. Bull it so will be an issue

it is going to be dragged up, you can be sure of that.

[aquart]

19. Not really. The media wants him.

They'll agree it was debunked. That will MAKE it debunked.

[aquart]

14. DEBUNKED????

Oh, that it was not.

[Evergreen Emerald]

2. Because Obama's campaign is a fairy tale. Nothing is vetted.

Nothing is questioned. Obama re-writes history and the media repeats his re-write without question.

[Jim Sagle]

3. Maybe 'cuz it's a just a bunch of RNC shit?

The Chicago Trib peddled this hooey and no one was interested.

[burythehatchet]

5. Did I ever tell you the one about the Rose Law Firm billing records? Did you catch that one?

[Enrique]

7. because opponents of Obama have little interest in sliming him

which is not the case with opponents of a certain candidate.

[Richard Steele]

9. Trying for a DUzy, are ye?

:rofl:

[Jim Sagle]

20. No joke, just fact.

The empty suit and the empty pantsuit deal in slime (along with empty buzzwords like "change" and "experience") while the REAL Dem deals with issues and reality. It must suck to be a Hillbot or an Obamabozo, knowing that you settled on shoddy goods.

[BooScout]

10. I'm not sliming him....

I just heard about this and wondered why I hadn't heard about it before.Of course by merely mentioning it I am going to now be crucified for my ulterior motives I realize that.

[Enrique]

12. exactly right, you're not sliming him

if opponents of Obama were driven by hatred the way Clinton opponents are, then Rezko would be a household name on DU. Posts about every aspect of Rezko would be posted constantly and repetitiously, and they would all get voted to the top of the Greatest Page.

[BooScout]

8. This is the link I was given...

on aanother forum. The link is dated January 10th.

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4111483

[Rex]

11. The GOP is saving that one for if he wins the primaries.

They leave the hard shit for last.

[aquart]

13. They chewed it for a year in Chicago. Couldn't get indictable material.

But, seriously, you have to waffle and spin a whole lot to look at that house deal as clean.

Not indictable is NOT the same as not dirty. It was dirty.

And sweet Obama is skilled enough to look deep into your eyes, smile, and lie. Which should stand him in very good stead should he become president.

[Rex]

15. Well, look at it this way - he is not the primary winner yet.

Why waste the good ammo, when you can let your opponents shoot each other in the foot? They all lie to us on some level aquart. We just have to smile and decide which lie we can live with. Reality sucks that way.

It could be worse, we could be GOPers. :puke:

[dysfunctional press]

17. what about it was dirty?

you were on another thread throwing out imaginary numbers, and displaying total ignorance about how real estate works.

[Jane Austin]

18. Obama has acknowledged it was a stupid mistake. n/t

[Roy]

16. How come no one is talking about Rezko?

Is he offering a better health care plan?

Can he stop this ridiculous war?

Is he a prosecutor investigating countless crimes against humanity perpetrated by this criminal administration?

Is he more important than the many important topics of the day, or can he just be used as an excuse to ignore what is important?